Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sun, Jan 15, 2012·Tampa Bay Times Forum, Tampa

Pittsburgh Penguins 6, Tampa Bay Lightning 3

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 88% of the time.

TBL winsPIT wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
PIT217015412644
TBL050837320

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 2:43PITJames NealPPAssists: Paul Martin, Evgeni Malkin · Wrist, 0.04 xG1–0
  2. P1 10:38PITRichard ParkUnassisted · Snap, 0.09 xG2–0
  3. P3 0:34PITJames NealPPAssists: Evgeni Malkin, Steve Sullivan · Slap, 0.04 xG3–0
  4. P3 2:00TBLMatt GilroyAssists: Steven Stamkos, Martin St. Louis · Wrist, 0.02 xG3–1
  5. P3 4:53TBLRyan MalonePPAssists: Vincent Lecavalier, Teddy Purcell · Tip-in, 0.10 xG3–2
  6. P3 6:50TBLTeddy PurcellAssists: Vincent Lecavalier, Bruno Gervais · Wrist, 0.22 xG3–3
  7. P3 7:38PITEvgeni MalkinGWGUnassisted · Backhand, 0.01 xG4–3
  8. P3 9:27PITEvgeni MalkinAssists: Brooks Orpik · Backhand, 0.08 xG5–3
  9. P3 19:04PITEvgeni MalkinENUnassisted · Wrist, 0.62 xG6–3
Penalties (13)
  1. P1 0:46TBLSteven Stamkos: Slashing2 min · PPG
  2. P1 6:24TBLPierre-Cedric Labrie: Fighting5 min
  3. P1 6:24PITDeryk Engelland: Fighting5 min
  4. P1 12:07TBLPavel Kubina: Hooking2 min
  5. P2 14:53TBLSteve Downie: Boarding2 min
  6. P2 19:45TBLSteve Downie: Roughing2 min · PPG
  7. P3 4:01PITDeryk Engelland: High sticking2 min · PPG
  8. P3 12:11TBLVincent Lecavalier: Roughing2 min
  9. P3 12:11PITEvgeni Malkin: Roughing2 min
  10. P3 12:11TBLVincent Lecavalier: Roughing2 min
  11. P3 12:11TBLVincent Lecavalier: Misconduct10 min
  12. P3 12:16PITJames Neal: Misconduct10 min
  13. P3 12:16TBLPavel Kubina: Misconduct10 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PIT00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0TBL
45% to win55% to win
← PIT attackTBL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Jeffrey won the faceoff against Lecavalier
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PITTBL
44Shots on goal20
3.8Expected goals1.3
73Shot attempts36
33Faceoffs won46
5Power plays1
19Penalty minutes37
24Hits29
8Blocked shots18
9Giveaways4
6Takeaways12

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestKunitz – Malkin – Neal11:11

    xG 0.81–0.27 (75%)attempts 13–6goals 1–0

  2. Asham – Adams – Tangradi3:37

    xG 0.41–0.01 (98%)attempts 5–1goals 0–0

  3. Park – Sullivan – Cooke6:48

    xG 0.43–0.03 (94%)attempts 8–3goals 1–0

  4. Dupuis – Kennedy – Jeffrey9:19

    xG 0.37–0.06 (86%)attempts 11–7goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestOrpik – Niskanen6:01

    xG 0.68–0.06 (92%)attempts 7–3goals 1–0

  2. Martin – Michalek17:39

    xG 0.94–0.37 (72%)attempts 16–12goals 2–0

  3. Niskanen – Lovejoy7:13

    xG 0.36–0.04 (89%)attempts 8–5goals 0–0

Tampa Bay Lightning

Forward lines

  1. bestLecavalier – Malone – Purcell7:06

    xG 0.49–0.16 (76%)attempts 13–4goals 1–0

  2. Moore – Thompson – Tyrell6:22

    xG 0.12–0.13 (48%)attempts 2–6goals 0–1

  3. St. Louis – Downie – Stamkos3:33

    xG 0.01–0.02 (36%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0

  4. St. Louis – Pyatt – Stamkos3:18

    xG 0.07–0.11 (39%)attempts 3–2goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. Brewer – Gervais2:02

    xG 0.00–0.04 (0%)attempts 0–1goals 0–0

  2. Clark – Gilroy15:53

    xG 0.26–0.60 (30%)attempts 10–18goals 1–1

  3. Gervais – Mikkelson13:37

    xG 0.31–0.66 (32%)attempts 9–13goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

TBL 1.3 xGPIT 3.8 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

TBLPIT

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

TBL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line TBL is favoured, below it PIT. Dots are goals.

Excitement 92/100 · #72 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.71 · 9 goals in reach · 3-goal lead cutComeback index 44% (winner's lowest chance)
PIT 100%5050%50TBL 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +34 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 88% of the time.

TBL winsPIT wins

Simulated goal difference (TBL − PIT), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).