Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Jan 19, 2013·Tampa Bay Times Forum, Tampa

Washington Capitals 3, Tampa Bay Lightning 6

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Tampa Bay Lightning win this game 58% of the time.

TBL winsWSH wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
WSH1172607330
TBL28113313634

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 6:24TBLEric BrewerAssists: Matt Carle, Martin St. Louis · Wrist, 0.02 xG0–1
  2. P1 8:25WSHJoel WardPPAssists: Tom Poti, Mike Ribeiro · Wrist, 0.27 xG1–1
  3. P1 9:09TBLVincent LecavalierAssists: Keith Aulie · Wrist, 0.19 xG1–2
  4. P2 1:59WSHJoel WardAssists: Jason Chimera, John Carlson · Wrist, 0.15 xG2–2
  5. P2 5:11TBLMartin St. LouisPPAssists: Vincent Lecavalier, Cory Conacher · Wrist, 0.32 xG2–3
  6. P2 18:15WSHWojtek WolskiAssists: Mike Ribeiro, Roman Hamrlik · Wrist, 0.23 xG3–3
  7. P3 4:57TBLMartin St. LouisPPGWGAssists: Steven Stamkos, Teddy Purcell · Slap, 0.12 xG3–4
  8. P3 13:24TBLCory ConacherAssists: Teddy Purcell · Wrist, 0.08 xG3–5
  9. P3 16:42TBLEric BrewerPPAssists: Teddy Purcell, Steven Stamkos · Slap, 0.04 xG3–6
Penalties (13)
  1. P1 0:28TBLRyan Malone: Interference2 min
  2. P1 2:51TBLBrian Lee: Hooking2 min
  3. P1 6:37TBLBrian Lee: Boarding2 min · PPG
  4. P1 14:01WSHTroy Brouwer: Boarding2 min
  5. P2 4:06WSHWojtek Wolski: Holding2 min · PPG
  6. P2 6:59WSHJason Chimera: Roughing2 min
  7. P2 14:28WSHMike Ribeiro: High sticking2 min
  8. P2 17:26TBLSami Salo: Holding2 min
  9. P2 17:26WSHAlex Ovechkin: Embellishment2 min
  10. P3 3:18WSHMathieu Perreault: Tripping2 min · PPG
  11. P3 4:22WSHNicklas Backstrom: Tripping2 min
  12. P3 7:04TBLTom Pyatt: Holding2 min
  13. P3 15:42WSHMatt Hendricks: Roughing2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

WSH00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0TBL
43% to win57% to win
← WSH attackTBL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Backstrom won the faceoff against Stamkos
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

WSHTBL
30Shots on goal34
2.3Expected goals2.7
50Shot attempts51
34Faceoffs won40
4Power plays7
16Penalty minutes10
16Hits27
10Blocked shots8
6Giveaways9
6Takeaways5

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Washington Capitals

Forward lines

  1. bestRibeiro – Wolski – Brouwer9:41

    xG 0.22–0.09 (72%)attempts 6–5goals 0–0

  2. Hendricks – Ovechkin – Backstrom3:51

    xG 0.01–0.01 (45%)attempts 2–1goals 0–0

  3. Chimera – Ward – Beagle6:44

    xG 0.09–0.19 (32%)attempts 4–5goals 0–0

  4. Ovechkin – Backstrom – Johansson8:34

    xG 0.25–0.42 (38%)attempts 8–11goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestHamrlik – Green6:00

    xG 0.15–0.08 (65%)attempts 8–5goals 0–0

  2. Poti – Green5:23

    xG 0.30–0.24 (56%)attempts 6–8goals 0–1

  3. Poti – Schultz2:46

    xG 0.07–0.02 (75%)attempts 3–3goals 0–1

Tampa Bay Lightning

Forward lines

  1. bestSt. Louis – Malone – Stamkos9:33

    xG 0.35–0.06 (85%)attempts 7–3goals 0–0

  2. Lecavalier – Pouliot – Purcell3:32

    xG 0.29–0.00 (100%)attempts 6–0goals 1–0

  3. Lecavalier – Purcell – Conacher2:51

    xG 0.09–0.11 (45%)attempts 4–5goals 0–0

  4. Hall – Crombeen – Thompson6:52

    xG 0.13–0.39 (25%)attempts 6–8goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestLee – Aulie6:21

    xG 0.24–0.18 (57%)attempts 5–3goals 0–0

  2. Salo – Hedman11:29

    xG 0.33–0.29 (54%)attempts 10–10goals 1–0

  3. Brewer – Carle9:07

    xG 0.11–0.13 (47%)attempts 7–8goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

TBL 2.7 xGWSH 2.3 xG
-0.500.511.522.53P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

TBLWSH

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

TBL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line TBL is favoured, below it WSH. Dots are goals.

Excitement 93/100 · #61 of 720 this seasonSwing 2.30 · 9 goals in reachComeback index 52% (winner's lowest chance)
WSH 100%5050%50TBL 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +29 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Tampa Bay Lightning win this game 58% of the time.

TBL winsWSH wins

Simulated goal difference (TBL − WSH), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).