Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Jan 29, 2013·Tampa Bay Times Forum, Tampa

Florida Panthers 2, Tampa Bay Lightning 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Tampa Bay Lightning win this game 61% of the time.

TBL winsFLA wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
FLA16011111228
TBL211210112533

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 11:09TBLSteven StamkosPPAssists: Martin St. Louis, Vincent Lecavalier · Wrist, 0.15 xG0–1
  2. P1 11:24FLAPeter MuellerUnassisted · Wrist, 0.17 xG1–1
  3. P1 12:49TBLCory ConacherAssists: Victor Hedman · Wrist, 0.07 xG1–2
  4. P2 3:18TBLTom PyattGWGAssists: Dana Tyrell · Tip-in, 0.10 xG1–3
  5. P2 15:39TBLDana TyrellAssists: Tom Pyatt, Benoit Pouliot · Wrist, 0.11 xG1–4
  6. P3 14:13TBLVincent LecavalierPPAssists: Benoit Pouliot, Cory Conacher · Slap, 0.17 xG1–5
  7. P3 14:31FLATomas FleischmannSHUnassisted · Wrist, 0.18 xG2–5
Penalties (15)
  1. P1 9:40TBLB.J. Crombeen: Tripping2 min
  2. P1 9:40TBLB.J. Crombeen: Fighting5 min
  3. P1 9:40FLAKeaton Ellerby: Fighting5 min · PPG
  4. P1 9:40FLAKeaton Ellerby: Misconduct10 min
  5. P1 9:40FLAKeaton Ellerby: Instigator2 min
  6. P1 9:40FLAKeaton Ellerby: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  7. P1 14:29FLAMike Weaver: Tripping2 min
  8. P1 16:07TBLRyan Malone: Tripping2 min
  9. P2 10:38TBLCory Conacher: Holding2 min
  10. P2 16:34TBLSteven Stamkos: Tripping2 min
  11. P3 6:05TBLTom Pyatt: Holding2 min
  12. P3 10:34FLAScottie Upshall: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  13. P3 12:43FLAFilip Kuba: Slashing2 min · PPG
  14. P3 14:13FLATomas Kopecky: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  15. P3 14:13FLATomas Kopecky: Misconduct10 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

FLA00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0TBL
43% to win57% to win
← FLA attackTBL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Lecavalier won the faceoff against Matthias
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

FLATBL
28Shots on goal33
2.2Expected goals2.8
48Shot attempts50
32Faceoffs won27
4Power plays5
37Penalty minutes15
18Hits19
7Blocked shots10
6Giveaways13
5Takeaways12

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Florida Panthers

Forward lines

  1. bestMueller – Shore – Huberdeau7:06

    xG 0.42–0.06 (87%)attempts 12–3goals 1–0

  2. Kovalev – Skille – Matthias7:36

    xG 0.24–0.16 (60%)attempts 9–6goals 0–1

  3. Parros – Smithson – Upshall3:32

    xG 0.12–0.19 (39%)attempts 3–3goals 0–1

  4. Kopecky – Fleischmann – Versteeg7:35

    xG 0.03–0.13 (18%)attempts 2–4goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestCampbell – Kulikov5:14

    xG 0.32–0.01 (96%)attempts 4–1goals 1–0

  2. Jovanovski – Ellerby2:54

    xG 0.02–0.03 (38%)attempts 1–2goals 0–0

  3. Campbell – Ellerby2:22

    xG 0.00–0.02 (0%)attempts 0–1goals 0–0

Tampa Bay Lightning

Forward lines

  1. bestPouliot – Pyatt – Tyrell5:15

    xG 0.38–0.28 (58%)attempts 6–7goals 2–0

  2. Hall – Crombeen – Thompson5:30

    xG 0.13–0.04 (76%)attempts 3–3goals 0–0

  3. St. Louis – Purcell – Stamkos12:25

    xG 0.24–0.26 (48%)attempts 7–8goals 0–0

  4. Lecavalier – Malone – Conacher7:24

    xG 0.09–0.16 (35%)attempts 4–8goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestSalo – Hedman11:25

    xG 0.43–0.17 (72%)attempts 8–10goals 1–0

  2. Lee – Aulie11:48

    xG 0.38–0.18 (68%)attempts 9–11goals 1–0

  3. Brewer – Hedman3:16

    xG 0.16–0.06 (71%)attempts 3–1goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

TBL 2.8 xGFLA 2.2 xG
-0.500.511.522.53P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

TBLFLA

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

TBL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line TBL is favoured, below it FLA. Dots are goals.

Excitement 43/100 · #429 of 720 this seasonSwing 1.05 · 6 goals in reachComeback index 56% (winner's lowest chance)
FLA 100%5050%50TBL 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +19 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Tampa Bay Lightning win this game 61% of the time.

TBL winsFLA wins

Simulated goal difference (TBL − FLA), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).