Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Mar 5, 2015·Amalie Arena, Tampa

Toronto Maple Leafs 2, Tampa Bay Lightning 4

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Tampa Bay Lightning win this game 55% of the time.

TBL winsTOR wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
TOR0717113227
TBL21301028431

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 4:25TBLNikita KucherovAssists: Ondrej Palat, Tyler Johnson · Wrist, 0.07 xG0–1
  2. P1 15:17TBLRyan CallahanAssists: Steven Stamkos · Tip-in, 0.10 xG0–2
  3. P2 6:48TORDavid BoothAssists: Peter Holland · Wrist, 0.09 xG1–2
  4. P3 6:31TBLVladislav NamestnikovGWGAssists: Andrej Sustr, Victor Hedman · Tip-in, 0.09 xG1–3
  5. P3 15:14TBLAlex KillornPPAssists: Steven Stamkos, Jason Garrison · Tip-in, 0.10 xG1–4
  6. P3 17:42TORRichard PanikAssists: Dion Phaneuf, Nazem Kadri · Wrist, 0.02 xG2–4
Penalties (10)
  1. P1 0:18TBLCedric Paquette: Hooking2 min
  2. P2 7:05TORZach Sill: Roughing2 min
  3. P2 7:05TBLBraydon Coburn: Roughing2 min
  4. P2 12:28TBLAndrej Sustr: Holding2 min
  5. P2 15:55TORPeter Holland: Fighting5 min
  6. P2 15:55TBLCedric Paquette: Fighting5 min
  7. P2 19:13TORJames van Riemsdyk: Boarding2 min
  8. P3 9:09TORDion Phaneuf: Boarding2 min
  9. P3 13:45TORJoffrey Lupul: Interference2 min · PPG
  10. P3 18:11TBLNikita Kucherov: High sticking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

TOR00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0TBL
46% to win54% to win
← TOR attackTBL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Filppula won the faceoff against Kadri
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

TORTBL
27Shots on goal31
1.8Expected goals2.0
59Shot attempts54
37Faceoffs won29
3Power plays3
13Penalty minutes13
25Hits21
14Blocked shots21
5Giveaways11
5Takeaways5

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Toronto Maple Leafs

Forward lines

  1. bestLindstrom – Smith – Sill6:00

    xG 0.22–0.17 (56%)attempts 3–5goals 0–1

  2. Kessel – van Riemsdyk – Bozak12:12

    xG 0.20–0.18 (52%)attempts 14–6goals 0–1

  3. Lupul – Booth – Holland8:04

    xG 0.28–0.40 (41%)attempts 5–9goals 1–1

  4. Komarov – Kadri – Panik9:37

    xG 0.35–0.58 (38%)attempts 14–14goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestPolak – Rielly12:52

    xG 0.51–0.29 (64%)attempts 15–13goals 0–0

  2. Gardiner – Rielly2:36

    xG 0.27–0.06 (82%)attempts 6–1goals 0–0

  3. Phaneuf – Gardiner14:48

    xG 0.22–0.60 (27%)attempts 10–15goals 0–1

Tampa Bay Lightning

Forward lines

  1. bestCallahan – Killorn – Stamkos11:03

    xG 0.82–0.41 (66%)attempts 19–13goals 1–1

  2. Johnson – Palat – Kucherov10:49

    xG 0.35–0.18 (66%)attempts 12–10goals 1–0

  3. Filppula – Paquette – Drouin7:54

    xG 0.22–0.21 (51%)attempts 6–5goals 0–1

  4. Morrow – Boyle – Namestnikov8:05

    xG 0.07–0.32 (17%)attempts 3–7goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestStralman – Nesterov12:34

    xG 0.64–0.32 (66%)attempts 15–10goals 0–0

  2. Coburn – Garrison11:15

    xG 0.44–0.16 (74%)attempts 10–13goals 2–0

  3. Hedman – Sustr15:27

    xG 0.55–0.52 (51%)attempts 15–13goals 1–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

TBL 2.0 xGTOR 1.8 xG
00.511.52P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

TBLTOR

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

TBL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line TBL is favoured, below it TOR. Dots are goals.

Excitement 42/100 · #665 of 1230 this seasonSwing 0.87 · 6 goals in reachComeback index 51% (winner's lowest chance)
TOR 100%5050%50TBL 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +17 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Tampa Bay Lightning win this game 55% of the time.

TBL winsTOR wins

Simulated goal difference (TBL − TOR), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).