Skip to content
Ice Lab

Wed, Apr 1, 2015·First Niagara Center, Buffalo

Toronto Maple Leafs 3, Buffalo Sabres 4

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Buffalo Sabres win this game 70% of the time.

BUF winsTOR wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
TOR1927011327
BUF11311325431

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 6:48BUFZac DalpeAssists: Matt Ellis, Andrej Meszaros · Backhand, 0.12 xG0–1
  2. P1 16:41TOREric BrewerAssists: Phil Kessel, Tyler Bozak · Slap, 0.03 xG1–1
  3. P2 0:47TORJames van RiemsdykAssists: Phil Kessel, Tyler Bozak · Backhand, 0.11 xG2–1
  4. P2 13:24TORNazem KadriAssists: Richard Panik · Wrist, 0.08 xG3–1
  5. P2 13:54BUFCody HodgsonAssists: Andre Benoit, Phil Varone · Backhand, 0.14 xG3–2
  6. P3 1:33BUFMatt MoulsonPPAssists: Johan Larsson, Brian Gionta · Slap, 0.22 xG3–3
  7. P3 3:14BUFMatt EllisGWGAssists: Nikita Zadorov, Brian Gionta · Backhand, 0.09 xG3–4
Penalties (9)
  1. P1 3:15BUFMikhail Grigorenko: High sticking2 min
  2. P1 8:15BUFJohan Larsson: Holding2 min
  3. P1 17:52TORZach Sill: High sticking2 min
  4. P2 8:34TORNazem Kadri: High sticking2 min
  5. P3 1:05TORJoakim Lindstrom: Tripping2 min · PPG
  6. P3 6:32TORDion Phaneuf: Hooking2 min
  7. P3 10:34TORTJ Brennan: Slashing2 min
  8. P3 15:01BUFMike Weber: Tripping2 min
  9. P3 18:41BUFAnders Lindback: Cross checking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

TOR00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0BUF
46% to win54% to win
← TOR attackBUF attack →
  1. P1 20:00Bozak won the faceoff against Grigorenko
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

TORBUF
27Shots on goal31
2.0Expected goals3.2
53Shot attempts57
27Faceoffs won31
4Power plays5
10Penalty minutes8
8Hits16
12Blocked shots16
5Giveaways5
2Takeaways4

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Toronto Maple Leafs

Forward lines

  1. bestKessel – van Riemsdyk – Bozak11:45

    xG 0.41–0.18 (69%)attempts 11–4goals 2–0

  2. Sill – Panik – Bailey4:12

    xG 0.00–0.00attempts 0–2goals 0–0

  3. Lindstrom – Komarov – Kadri6:22

    xG 0.20–0.28 (42%)attempts 7–4goals 0–1

  4. Lupul – Booth – Smith5:10

    xG 0.03–0.40 (6%)attempts 1–9goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestGardiner – Rielly9:58

    xG 0.17–0.07 (70%)attempts 6–3goals 0–0

  2. Phaneuf – Rielly2:10

    xG 0.07–0.03 (70%)attempts 3–2goals 0–0

  3. Phaneuf – Gardiner3:12

    xG 0.14–0.13 (51%)attempts 5–2goals 0–0

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. bestHodgson – Dalpe – Varone6:29

    xG 0.37–0.05 (88%)attempts 7–5goals 1–0

  2. Ellis – Hodgson – Dalpe2:07

    xG 0.12–0.03 (82%)attempts 3–2goals 1–0

  3. Gionta – Foligno – Grigorenko11:46

    xG 0.36–0.31 (54%)attempts 8–10goals 0–1

  4. Moulson – Ennis – Larsson12:11

    xG 0.29–0.34 (46%)attempts 6–14goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestStrachan – Meszaros12:26

    xG 0.64–0.34 (65%)attempts 11–17goals 1–1

  2. Benoit – Zadorov12:04

    xG 0.44–0.28 (61%)attempts 10–7goals 2–0

  3. Weber – Bogosian15:06

    xG 0.26–0.45 (36%)attempts 10–11goals 0–2

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

BUF 3.2 xGTOR 2.0 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

BUFTOR

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

BUF's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line BUF is favoured, below it TOR. Dots are goals.

Excitement 79/100 · #223 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.90 · 7 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 14% (winner's lowest chance)
TOR 100%5050%50BUF 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +28 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Buffalo Sabres win this game 70% of the time.

BUF winsTOR wins

Simulated goal difference (BUF − TOR), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).