Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Oct 15, 2015·Gila River Arena, Glendale

Minnesota Wild 4, Arizona Coyotes 3

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Arizona Coyotes win this game 60% of the time.

ARI winsMIN wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
MIN2122903424
ARI06211113330

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 9:22MINZach ParisePPAssists: Jason Pominville, Ryan Suter · Backhand, 0.13 xG1–0
  2. P1 10:20MINThomas VanekAssists: Justin Fontaine · Wrist, 0.04 xG2–0
  3. P2 7:07MINMikko KoivuSHGWGAssists: Jason Zucker, Marco Scandella · Wrist, 0.20 xG4–1
  4. P2 12:14ARIAnthony DuclairAssists: Max Domi · Backhand, 0.12 xG3–1
  5. P2 12:36MINMikael GranlundAssists: Zach Parise, Jason Pominville · Wrist, 0.13 xG3–0
  6. P2 19:50ARIMax DomiAssists: Martin Hanzal, Connor Murphy · Wrist, 0.08 xG4–2
  7. P3 15:12ARIMichael StoneAssists: Shane Doan, Brad Richardson · Wrist, 0.33 xG4–3
Penalties (17)
  1. P1 1:20MINNate Prosser: Tripping2 min
  2. P1 9:14ARIBoyd Gordon: Holding2 min · PPG
  3. P1 15:45ARIAnthony Duclair: Interference2 min
  4. P1 18:41ARIMartin Hanzal: Cross checking2 min
  5. P2 5:43MINJonas Brodin: Interference2 min
  6. P2 14:11MINJustin Fontaine: Interference2 min
  7. P2 14:42ARIOliver Ekman-Larsson: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  8. P2 14:42ARISteve Downie: Misconduct10 min
  9. P2 14:42MINErik Haula: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  10. P3 1:31MINNate Prosser: Hooking2 min
  11. P3 6:06MINMathew Dumba: Tripping2 min
  12. P3 12:22MINRyan Carter: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  13. P3 12:22ARISteve Downie: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  14. P3 13:43MINJonas Brodin: High sticking2 min
  15. P3 14:57ARISteve Downie: Hooking2 min
  16. P3 16:01MINNino Niederreiter: Too many men on the ice2 min
  17. P3 17:44ARIMax Domi: Hooking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

MIN00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0ARI
47% to win54% to win
← MIN attackARI attack →
  1. P1 20:00Vermette won the faceoff against Koivu
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

MINARI
24Shots on goal30
1.7Expected goals2.2
41Shot attempts58
30Faceoffs won42
5Power plays7
18Penalty minutes24
21Hits22
15Blocked shots8
4Giveaways6
4Takeaways4

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestPominville – Parise – Granlund9:15

    xG 0.46–0.30 (60%)attempts 9–14goals 1–0

  2. Koivu – Zucker – Niederreiter8:17

    xG 0.29–0.20 (59%)attempts 11–3goals 0–2

  3. Vanek – Coyle – Fontaine7:31

    xG 0.05–0.06 (41%)attempts 3–3goals 1–0

  4. Porter – Carter – Haula4:24

    xG 0.00–0.06 (0%)attempts 0–4goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestScandella – Prosser7:46

    xG 0.44–0.06 (88%)attempts 11–5goals 1–0

  2. Suter – Spurgeon9:19

    xG 0.29–0.11 (72%)attempts 7–6goals 1–1

  3. Brodin – Dumba10:12

    xG 0.13–0.39 (24%)attempts 5–12goals 0–1

Arizona Coyotes

Forward lines

  1. bestHanzal – Duclair – Domi2:49

    xG 0.16–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–0goals 0–0

  2. Doan – Richardson – Chipchura3:49

    xG 0.03–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–0goals 0–0

  3. Gordon – Downie – Martinook5:51

    xG 0.01–0.01 (38%)attempts 2–1goals 0–0

  4. Hanzal – Boedker – Rieder3:01

    xG 0.12–0.15 (46%)attempts 4–2goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestStone – Dahlbeck2:48

    xG 0.15–0.07 (68%)attempts 2–2goals 1–0

  2. Michalek – Ekman-Larsson3:14

    xG 0.02–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–0goals 0–0

  3. Michalek – Dahlbeck7:01

    xG 0.13–0.12 (52%)attempts 7–7goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

ARI 2.2 xGMIN 1.7 xG
00.511.52P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

ARIMIN

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

ARI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line ARI is favoured, below it MIN. Dots are goals.

Excitement 69/100 · #359 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.25 · 7 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 44% (winner's lowest chance)
MIN 100%5050%50ARI 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +20 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Arizona Coyotes win this game 60% of the time.

ARI winsMIN wins

Simulated goal difference (ARI − MIN), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).