Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Mar 1, 2016·Bridgestone Arena, Nashville

Dallas Stars 3, Nashville Predators 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Nashville Predators win this game 73% of the time.

NSH winsDAL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
DAL117110111338
NSH110314110534

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 12:38NSHCraig SmithAssists: Mike Ribeiro, Shea Weber · Snap, 0.29 xG0–1
  2. P1 12:48DALAntoine RousselAssists: Cody Eakin · Wrist, 0.20 xG1–1
  3. P2 1:35NSHCalle JarnkrokAssists: James Neal, Anthony Bitetto · Tip-in, 0.15 xG1–2
  4. P2 9:17NSHShea WeberPPAssists: Roman Josi, Craig Smith · Slap, 0.05 xG1–3
  5. P2 9:48NSHMattias EkholmGWGAssists: Colin Wilson, Viktor Arvidsson · Backhand, 0.03 xG1–4
  6. P2 16:28DALJason SpezzaPPAssists: Jamie Benn, John Klingberg · Backhand, 0.50 xG2–4
  7. P3 5:37NSHJames NealAssists: Shea Weber, Ryan Johansen · Slap, 0.02 xG2–5
  8. P3 10:30DALVernon FiddlerAssists: Alex Goligoski, Antoine Roussel · Slap, 0.03 xG3–5
Penalties (11)
  1. P1 15:09NSHCraig Smith: Interference2 min
  2. P2 8:28DALJamie Benn: Interference2 min · PPG
  3. P2 12:42NSHAnthony Bitetto: Roughing2 min
  4. P2 12:42DALAntoine Roussel: Roughing2 min
  5. P2 15:07NSHRoman Josi: Cross checking2 min · PPG
  6. P2 16:06NSHMiikka Salomaki: High sticking2 min
  7. P2 18:30DALRadek Faksa: Holding2 min
  8. P3 3:02DALJason Demers: Cross checking2 min
  9. P3 6:04DALAntoine Roussel: Roughing2 min
  10. P3 19:47DALJamie Benn: Fighting5 min
  11. P3 19:47NSHPaul Gaustad: Fighting5 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

DAL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0NSH
47% to win54% to win
← DAL attackNSH attack →
  1. P1 20:00Fisher won the faceoff against Fiddler
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

DALNSH
38Shots on goal34
2.2Expected goals3.7
65Shot attempts60
37Faceoffs won42
3Power plays4
15Penalty minutes13
14Hits15
12Blocked shots19
9Giveaways7
15Takeaways9

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Dallas Stars

Forward lines

  1. bestHemsky – Roussel – Eakin7:40

    xG 0.53–0.27 (66%)attempts 10–7goals 1–0

  2. Fiddler – Sceviour – Faksa6:29

    xG 0.04–0.21 (15%)attempts 4–4goals 0–0

  3. Spezza – Janmark – Nichushkin9:00

    xG 0.13–0.53 (19%)attempts 10–11goals 0–0

  4. Sharp – Benn – Seguin6:13

    xG 0.10–0.64 (13%)attempts 8–9goals 0–2

Defence pairs

  1. Russell – Benn11:25

    xG 0.21–0.39 (35%)attempts 13–12goals 0–1

  2. Goligoski – Klingberg14:30

    xG 0.66–1.20 (36%)attempts 15–19goals 2–1

  3. Oduya – Demers12:50

    xG 0.22–0.82 (21%)attempts 17–13goals 0–2

Nashville Predators

Forward lines

  1. bestRibeiro – Smith – Forsberg9:41

    xG 0.86–0.12 (87%)attempts 14–9goals 1–0

  2. Neal – Jarnkrok – Johansen9:27

    xG 1.05–0.48 (69%)attempts 16–9goals 2–1

  3. Fisher – Wilson – Arvidsson8:46

    xG 0.28–0.13 (69%)attempts 5–11goals 1–0

  4. Gaustad – Watson – Salomaki7:41

    xG 0.14–0.12 (55%)attempts 7–9goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestWeber – Josi14:10

    xG 1.38–0.58 (70%)attempts 22–23goals 2–1

  2. Ellis – Ekholm8:27

    xG 0.37–0.13 (75%)attempts 11–7goals 1–0

  3. Ekholm – Granberg7:15

    xG 0.26–0.03 (89%)attempts 5–4goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

NSH 3.7 xGDAL 2.2 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

NSHDAL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

NSH's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line NSH is favoured, below it DAL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 66/100 · #410 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.10 · 8 goals in reachComeback index 52% (winner's lowest chance)
DAL 100%5050%50NSH 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +20 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Nashville Predators win this game 73% of the time.

NSH winsDAL wins

Simulated goal difference (NSH − DAL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).