Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Jan 12, 2019·KeyBank Center, Buffalo

Tampa Bay Lightning 5, Buffalo Sabres 3

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Buffalo Sabres win this game 53% of the time.

BUF winsTBL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
TBL16111313530
BUF21601215333

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 0:26TBLBrayden PointAssists: Nikita Kucherov, Tyler Johnson · Wrist, 0.10 xG1–0
  2. P1 5:47BUFSam ReinhartAssists: Jeff Skinner, Rasmus Dahlin · Wrist, 0.04 xG1–1
  3. P1 19:50BUFTage ThompsonAssists: Zemgus Girgensons, Vladimir Sobotka · Wrist, 0.11 xG1–2
  4. P2 7:50TBLOndrej PalatAssists: Mikhail Sergachev, Victor Hedman · Tip-in, 0.08 xG2–2
  5. P3 5:54BUFMarco ScandellaAssists: Jason Pominville, Conor Sheary · Tip-in, 0.13 xG2–3
  6. P3 6:17TBLNikita KucherovAssists: Steven Stamkos · Wrist, 0.05 xG3–3
  7. P3 14:44TBLSteven StamkosGWGAssists: Nikita Kucherov, Victor Hedman · Wrist, 0.08 xG4–3
  8. P3 18:41TBLRyan CallahanPPAssists: Anthony Cirelli, Alex Killorn · Snap, 0.19 xG5–3
Penalties (7)
  1. P1 3:17TBLBraydon Coburn: Roughing2 min
  2. P1 10:57TBLSteven Stamkos: Tripping2 min
  3. P1 12:25TBLYanni Gourde: Holding2 min
  4. P3 13:27TBLMikhail Sergachev: High sticking double minor4 min
  5. P3 13:27BUFJohan Larsson: Cross checking2 min
  6. P3 13:50BUFJack Eichel: Elbowing2 min
  7. P3 16:45BUFLawrence Pilut: Holding2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

TBL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0BUF
46% to win54% to win
← TBL attackBUF attack →
  1. P1 20:00Larsson won the faceoff against Miller
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

TBLBUF
30Shots on goal33
2.4Expected goals2.6
51Shot attempts55
30Faceoffs won32
2Power plays4
10Penalty minutes6
11Hits20
10Blocked shots7
2Giveaways10
3Takeaways10

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Tampa Bay Lightning

Forward lines

  1. bestStamkos – Palat – Kucherov5:51

    xG 0.61–0.08 (88%)attempts 11–3goals 2–0

  2. Johnson – Kucherov – Point10:21

    xG 0.64–0.38 (63%)attempts 16–6goals 1–1

  3. Callahan – Miller – Paquette2:28

    xG 0.25–0.13 (66%)attempts 2–1goals 0–1

  4. Stamkos – Palat – Gourde7:36

    xG 0.19–0.12 (61%)attempts 7–3goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestGirardi – Hedman13:01

    xG 0.55–0.47 (54%)attempts 15–8goals 2–0

  2. Coburn – Sergachev15:01

    xG 0.55–0.57 (49%)attempts 9–16goals 0–0

  3. McDonagh – Cernak15:15

    xG 0.57–0.70 (45%)attempts 14–14goals 0–1

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. bestOkposo – Larsson – Girgensons10:09

    xG 0.60–0.47 (56%)attempts 11–6goals 0–1

  2. Skinner – Reinhart – Eichel13:10

    xG 0.49–0.40 (55%)attempts 14–12goals 1–0

  3. Pominville – Sheary – Mittelstadt6:09

    xG 0.14–0.26 (35%)attempts 5–8goals 0–0

  4. Sobotka – Rodrigues – Thompson10:26

    xG 0.29–0.63 (32%)attempts 5–13goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestBogosian – Pilut11:40

    xG 0.51–0.40 (56%)attempts 7–12goals 0–1

  2. McCabe – Dahlin13:51

    xG 0.52–0.50 (51%)attempts 16–9goals 0–0

  3. Scandella – Ristolainen13:34

    xG 0.34–0.69 (33%)attempts 6–19goals 1–2

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

BUF 2.6 xGTBL 2.4 xG
00.511.522.5P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

BUFTBL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

BUF's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line BUF is favoured, below it TBL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 86/100 · #200 of 1271 this seasonSwing 2.14 · 8 goals in reachComeback index 19% (winner's lowest chance)
TBL 100%5050%50BUF 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +37 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Buffalo Sabres win this game 53% of the time.

BUF winsTBL wins

Simulated goal difference (BUF − TBL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).