Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Feb 26, 2019·Gila River Arena, Glendale

Florida Panthers 3, Arizona Coyotes 4 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Arizona Coyotes win this game 71% of the time.

ARI winsFLA wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
FLA061826071327
ARI09212113063440

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P2 8:15ARIDerek StepanAssists: Lawson Crouse, Josh Archibald · Wrist, 0.06 xG0–1
  2. P2 14:44FLAMike HoffmanAssists: Jonathan Huberdeau, Aaron Ekblad · Wrist, 0.04 xG1–1
  3. P2 19:15ARIOliver Ekman-LarssonPPAssists: Clayton Keller, Jakob Chychrun · Backhand, 0.08 xG1–2
  4. P3 5:46FLAJamie McGinnAssists: Troy Brouwer, Riley Sheahan · Tip-in, 0.11 xG2–2
  5. P3 8:15FLAAleksander BarkovAssists: Troy Brouwer · Wrist, 0.14 xG3–2
  6. P3 13:31ARIDerek StepanSHUnassisted · Wrist, 0.12 xG3–3

Shootout

  1. 1. ARI Nick Cousins scored
  2. 2. FLA Jonathan Huberdeau scored
  3. 3. ARI Alex Galchenyuk scored
  4. 4. FLA Aleksander Barkov stopped
  5. 5. ARI Vinnie Hinostroza scored
Penalties (6)
  1. P2 18:54FLAJayce Hawryluk: Holding2 min · PPG
  2. P3 6:08FLARiley Stillman: Holding2 min
  3. P3 8:33FLAJoshua Brown: Tripping2 min
  4. P3 9:59FLAAaron Ekblad: Cross checking2 min
  5. P3 13:14ARIBrad Richardson: Hooking2 min
  6. P3 16:37FLAJamie McGinn: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

FLA00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0ARI
46% to win54% to win
← FLA attackARI attack →
  1. P1 20:00Barkov won the faceoff against Stepan
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

FLAARI
27Shots on goal40
2.8Expected goals4.2
58Shot attempts79
30Faceoffs won36
1Power plays5
10Penalty minutes2
33Hits25
17Blocked shots16
16Giveaways12
9Takeaways8

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Florida Panthers

Forward lines

  1. bestBrouwer – Sheahan – Hawryluk5:22

    xG 0.29–0.09 (76%)attempts 7–4goals 0–0

  2. Huberdeau – Barkov – Vatrano8:31

    xG 0.25–0.13 (65%)attempts 6–11goals 0–0

  3. Brouwer – McGinn – Sheahan3:46

    xG 0.14–0.12 (55%)attempts 4–2goals 1–0

  4. Dadonov – Trocheck – Vatrano3:41

    xG 0.11–0.14 (42%)attempts 4–5goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestBrown – Stillman8:00

    xG 0.34–0.08 (81%)attempts 11–2goals 0–0

  2. Pysyk – McCoshen14:57

    xG 0.60–0.46 (57%)attempts 15–14goals 1–0

  3. Yandle – Ekblad17:42

    xG 0.34–0.28 (55%)attempts 18–20goals 1–0

Arizona Coyotes

Forward lines

  1. bestRichardson – Panik – Hinostroza6:08

    xG 0.29–0.07 (81%)attempts 5–6goals 0–0

  2. Cousins – Galchenyuk – Keller3:12

    xG 0.22–0.01 (95%)attempts 5–1goals 0–0

  3. Galchenyuk – Dvorak – Keller5:25

    xG 0.39–0.29 (57%)attempts 4–7goals 0–2

  4. Stepan – Archibald – Crouse14:02

    xG 0.67–0.61 (52%)attempts 21–12goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestHjalmarsson – Ekman-Larsson17:17

    xG 0.54–0.25 (69%)attempts 19–12goals 1–0

  2. Goligoski – Chychrun17:00

    xG 0.74–0.49 (60%)attempts 19–20goals 0–0

  3. Ekman-Larsson – Oesterle2:40

    xG 0.13–0.02 (84%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

ARI 4.2 xGFLA 2.8 xG
01234P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

ARIFLA

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

ARI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line ARI is favoured, below it FLA. Dots are goals.

Excitement 93/100 · #104 of 1271 this seasonSwing 2.67 · 6 goals in reachComeback index 11% (winner's lowest chance)
FLA 100%5050%50ARI 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +33 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Arizona Coyotes win this game 71% of the time.

ARI winsFLA wins

Simulated goal difference (ARI − FLA), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).