Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Nov 9, 2019·Ericsson Globe, StockholmNeutral site

Buffalo Sabres 3, Tampa Bay Lightning 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Tampa Bay Lightning win this game 68% of the time.

TBL winsBUF wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
BUF117013213343
TBL112218210540

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 9:30BUFSam ReinhartAssists: Marcus Johansson, Brandon Montour · Wrist, 0.00 xG1–0
  2. P1 17:02TBLPatrick MaroonPPAssists: Yanni Gourde, Kevin Shattenkirk · Deflected, 0.00 xG1–1
  3. P2 1:58TBLVictor HedmanPPAssists: Steven Stamkos, Nikita Kucherov · Wrist, 0.00 xG1–2
  4. P2 19:57TBLPatrick MaroonAssists: Cedric Paquette, Kevin Shattenkirk · Wrist, 0.01 xG1–3
  5. P3 4:14BUFVictor OlofssonAssists: Jack Eichel, Sam Reinhart · Wrist, 0.01 xG2–3
  6. P3 9:48TBLYanni GourdeGWGAssists: Cedric Paquette · Wrist, 0.00 xG2–4
  7. P3 10:55TBLMathieu JosephAssists: Alex Killorn, Anthony Cirelli · Wrist, 0.01 xG2–5
  8. P3 19:22BUFJack EichelAssists: Rasmus Ristolainen, Rasmus Dahlin · Wrist, 0.01 xG3–5
Penalties (8)
  1. P1 10:40TBLNikita Kucherov: Hooking2 min
  2. P1 15:07BUFBrandon Montour: Roughing2 min · PPG
  3. P2 1:51BUFMarcus Johansson: Interference2 min · PPG
  4. P2 14:43BUFRasmus Ristolainen: Interference2 min
  5. P3 16:14TBLCedric Paquette: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  6. P3 16:14TBLCedric Paquette: Game misconduct10 min
  7. P3 17:59TBLErik Cernak: Roughing2 min
  8. P3 17:59BUFSam Reinhart: Roughing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

BUF00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0TBL
45% to win55% to win
← BUF attackTBL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Johansson won the faceoff against Point
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

BUFTBL
43Shots on goal40
0.3Expected goals0.8
74Shot attempts61
36Faceoffs won37
2Power plays3
8Penalty minutes16
19Hits12
5Blocked shots18
5Giveaways5
7Takeaways4

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. Skinner – Sheary – Rodrigues8:06

    xG 0.03–0.02 (56%)attempts 11–7goals 0–0

  2. Johansson – Vesey – Mittelstadt10:09

    xG 0.04–0.04 (51%)attempts 18–11goals 0–1

  3. Okposo – Larsson – Girgensons6:59

    xG 0.00–0.01 (26%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0

  4. Reinhart – Olofsson – Eichel13:31

    xG 0.04–0.06 (38%)attempts 13–12goals 0–2

Defence pairs

  1. Miller – Jokiharju14:16

    xG 0.06–0.04 (62%)attempts 18–13goals 1–0

  2. McCabe – Ristolainen16:47

    xG 0.04–0.04 (55%)attempts 20–12goals 0–2

  3. Montour – Dahlin14:32

    xG 0.04–0.06 (42%)attempts 19–12goals 1–1

Tampa Bay Lightning

Forward lines

  1. Maroon – Gourde – Paquette12:04

    xG 0.05–0.05 (51%)attempts 13–17goals 2–1

  2. Stamkos – Palat – Volkov9:01

    xG 0.02–0.02 (52%)attempts 9–8goals 0–0

  3. Johnson – Kucherov – Point11:18

    xG 0.04–0.04 (50%)attempts 8–15goals 0–1

  4. Killorn – Joseph – Cirelli10:06

    xG 0.02–0.03 (46%)attempts 6–12goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. McDonagh – Cernak17:44

    xG 0.07–0.04 (64%)attempts 16–17goals 1–1

  2. Shattenkirk – Hedman4:05

    xG 0.03–0.02 (56%)attempts 7–8goals 1–1

  3. Sergachev – Rutta4:12

    xG 0.01–0.01 (49%)attempts 5–5goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

TBL 0.8 xGBUF 0.3 xG
00.20.40.60.8P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

TBLBUF

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

TBL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line TBL is favoured, below it BUF. Dots are goals.

Excitement 66/100 · #368 of 1082 this seasonSwing 1.30 · 8 goals in reachComeback index 33% (winner's lowest chance)
BUF 100%5050%50TBL 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +21 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Tampa Bay Lightning win this game 68% of the time.

TBL winsBUF wins

Simulated goal difference (TBL − BUF), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).