Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Dec 5, 2019·Scotiabank Saddledome, Calgary

Buffalo Sabres 3, Calgary Flames 4

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Calgary Flames win this game 63% of the time.

CGY winsBUF wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
BUF11001128329
CGY1921119429

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 3:29BUFSam ReinhartAssists: Rasmus Ristolainen, Victor Olofsson · Tip-in, 0.05 xG1–0
  2. P1 16:42CGYJohnny GaudreauPPAssists: Sean Monahan, Matthew Tkachuk · Wrist, 0.06 xG1–1
  3. P2 11:18CGYTobias RiederSHAssists: Derek Ryan · Backhand, 0.28 xG1–2
  4. P2 15:02CGYSean MonahanAssists: Mikael Backlund, Rasmus Andersson · Snap, 0.10 xG1–3
  5. P3 3:58CGYMilan LucicGWGAssists: Derek Ryan, Dillon Dube · Wrist, 0.21 xG1–4
  6. P3 17:16BUFJake McCabeAssists: Victor Olofsson · Snap, 0.03 xG2–4
  7. P3 19:12BUFJack EichelPPAssists: Brandon Montour, Marcus Johansson · Wrist, 0.05 xG3–4
Penalties (10)
  1. P1 4:54CGYMatthew Tkachuk: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  2. P1 12:23CGYMichael Frolik: Slashing2 min
  3. P1 14:00CGYMikael Backlund: High sticking2 min
  4. P1 14:58BUFJeff Skinner: High sticking2 min · PPG
  5. P2 10:32CGYJohnny Gaudreau: Hooking2 min
  6. P2 18:17CGYOliver Kylington: Interference2 min
  7. P3 4:21CGYOliver Kylington: Cross checking2 min
  8. P3 5:24CGYNoah Hanifin: High sticking2 min
  9. P3 8:03BUFJimmy Vesey: Holding2 min
  10. P3 18:32CGYNoah Hanifin: Tripping2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

BUF00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CGY
45% to win55% to win
← BUF attackCGY attack →
  1. P1 20:00Lindholm won the faceoff against Eichel
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

BUFCGY
29Shots on goal29
2.5Expected goals3.4
54Shot attempts59
30Faceoffs won25
8Power plays2
4Penalty minutes16
11Hits16
10Blocked shots13
14Giveaways15
11Takeaways19

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. Girgensons – Vesey – Asplund2:09

    xG 0.28–0.36 (44%)attempts 3–4goals 0–0

  2. Larsson – Skinner – Sheary8:18

    xG 0.34–0.45 (43%)attempts 9–9goals 0–1

  3. Reinhart – Olofsson – Eichel12:30

    xG 0.47–0.68 (41%)attempts 12–12goals 2–0

  4. Johansson – Vesey – Mittelstadt9:14

    xG 0.12–0.43 (22%)attempts 6–13goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. McCabe – Ristolainen4:28

    xG 0.11–0.11 (49%)attempts 4–3goals 1–0

  2. McCabe – Montour4:53

    xG 0.07–0.08 (47%)attempts 2–4goals 0–0

  3. Scandella – Jokiharju3:06

    xG 0.09–0.13 (40%)attempts 1–3goals 0–0

Calgary Flames

Forward lines

  1. bestFrolik – Rieder – Jankowski5:33

    xG 0.86–0.41 (68%)attempts 11–5goals 0–1

  2. Backlund – Gaudreau – Monahan4:13

    xG 0.30–0.03 (91%)attempts 6–3goals 1–0

  3. Lindholm – Mangiapane – Tkachuk8:23

    xG 0.40–0.18 (69%)attempts 8–5goals 0–1

  4. Lucic – Gaudreau – Ryan4:30

    xG 0.21–0.15 (60%)attempts 7–6goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestAndersson – Kylington11:02

    xG 1.22–0.37 (77%)attempts 18–6goals 2–0

  2. Giordano – Brodie11:14

    xG 0.56–0.13 (81%)attempts 11–5goals 0–1

  3. Brodie – Hanifin2:07

    xG 0.09–0.12 (43%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CGY 3.4 xGBUF 2.5 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CGYBUF

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CGY's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CGY is favoured, below it BUF. Dots are goals.

Excitement 69/100 · #331 of 1082 this seasonSwing 1.09 · 7 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 33% (winner's lowest chance)
BUF 100%5050%50CGY 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +20 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Calgary Flames win this game 63% of the time.

CGY winsBUF wins

Simulated goal difference (CGY − BUF), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).