Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Dec 31, 2019·KeyBank Center, Buffalo

Tampa Bay Lightning 6, Buffalo Sabres 4

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Tampa Bay Lightning win this game 71% of the time.

BUF winsTBL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
TBL0331539627
BUF1103909428

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 19:03BUFConor ShearyAssists: Curtis Lazar · Slap, 0.11 xG0–1
  2. P2 2:12BUFMarcus JohanssonAssists: Conor Sheary, Marco Scandella · Wrist, 0.02 xG0–2
  3. P2 7:00TBLOndrej PalatPPAssists: Tyler Johnson, Mikhail Sergachev · Slap, 0.12 xG1–2
  4. P2 8:12BUFJimmy VeseyAssists: Marcus Johansson, Conor Sheary · Slap, 0.08 xG1–3
  5. P2 9:56BUFJack EichelSHUnassisted · Backhand, 0.13 xG1–4
  6. P2 13:57TBLAlex KillornPPAssists: Brayden Point, Nikita Kucherov · Wrist, 0.14 xG2–4
  7. P2 16:55TBLTyler JohnsonAssists: Ondrej Palat, Ryan McDonagh · Wrist, 0.09 xG3–4
  8. P3 6:20TBLKevin ShattenkirkAssists: Tyler Johnson, Anthony Cirelli · Wrist, 0.06 xG4–4
  9. P3 8:08TBLAlex KillornGWGAssists: Patrick Maroon, Cedric Paquette · Wrist, 0.11 xG5–4
  10. P3 19:57TBLAnthony CirelliENAssists: Alex Killorn, Steven Stamkos · Wrist, 0.62 xG6–4
Penalties (14)
  1. P1 4:03TBLSteven Stamkos: Tripping2 min
  2. P1 10:29BUFHenri Jokiharju: Slashing2 min
  3. P2 0:08TBLLuke Schenn: Roughing2 min
  4. P2 0:08BUFDalton Smith: Roughing2 min
  5. P2 3:21BUFKyle Okposo: Slashing2 min
  6. P2 5:08BUFHenri Jokiharju: Tripping2 min · PPG
  7. P2 8:34TBLMikhail Sergachev: Fighting5 min
  8. P2 8:34BUFJake McCabe: Instigator2 min
  9. P2 8:34BUFJake McCabe: Fighting5 min
  10. P2 8:34BUFJake McCabe: Instigator misconduct10 min
  11. P2 11:06TBLTyler Johnson: Interference2 min
  12. P2 12:59BUFMarcus Johansson: Hooking2 min · PPG
  13. P3 12:07TBLMikhail Sergachev: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  14. P3 15:42TBLNikita Kucherov: Cross checking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

TBL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0BUF
45% to win55% to win
← TBL attackBUF attack →
  1. P1 20:00Stamkos won the faceoff against Larsson
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

TBLBUF
27Shots on goal28
4.1Expected goals3.0
47Shot attempts51
23Faceoffs won28
5Power plays4
15Penalty minutes27
19Hits20
10Blocked shots8
5Giveaways8
1Takeaways5

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Tampa Bay Lightning

Forward lines

  1. bestStamkos – Kucherov – Point5:35

    xG 0.25–0.03 (88%)attempts 6–2goals 0–0

  2. Palat – Kucherov – Point3:23

    xG 0.21–0.07 (76%)attempts 5–3goals 0–0

  3. Killorn – Maroon – Paquette2:46

    xG 0.14–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–1goals 1–0

  4. Gourde – Verhaeghe – Stephens2:19

    xG 0.05–0.02 (74%)attempts 1–2goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestShattenkirk – Sergachev10:47

    xG 0.42–0.09 (82%)attempts 9–4goals 1–0

  2. Schenn – Hedman7:37

    xG 0.18–0.13 (58%)attempts 5–7goals 1–1

  3. Shattenkirk – Hedman2:28

    xG 0.06–0.31 (16%)attempts 2–5goals 0–0

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. bestJohansson – Vesey – Sheary4:29

    xG 0.22–0.00 (100%)attempts 6–0goals 1–0

  2. Johansson – Sheary – Asplund5:03

    xG 0.18–0.00 (100%)attempts 4–0goals 0–0

  3. Okposo – Larsson – Girgensons7:44

    xG 0.03–0.13 (21%)attempts 3–4goals 0–0

  4. Reinhart – Olofsson – Eichel12:42

    xG 0.48–0.83 (37%)attempts 12–19goals 0–2

Defence pairs

  1. bestMcCabe – Ristolainen5:46

    xG 0.47–0.12 (79%)attempts 5–2goals 0–1

  2. Scandella – Jokiharju6:41

    xG 0.39–0.09 (80%)attempts 8–5goals 2–0

  3. Montour – Dahlin11:08

    xG 0.48–0.35 (58%)attempts 13–7goals 1–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

BUF 3.0 xGTBL 4.1 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

BUFTBL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

BUF's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line BUF is favoured, below it TBL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 96/100 · #55 of 1082 this seasonSwing 1.94 · 10 goals in reach · 3-goal lead cutComeback index 5% (winner's lowest chance)
TBL 100%5050%50BUF 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +32 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Tampa Bay Lightning win this game 71% of the time.

BUF winsTBL wins

Simulated goal difference (BUF − TBL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).