Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Oct 23, 2021·Amalie Arena, Tampa

Colorado Avalanche 4, Tampa Bay Lightning 3 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Colorado Avalanche win this game 55% of the time.

TBL winsCOL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
COL1611016053427
TBL01211227012332

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 9:02COLGabriel LandeskogAssists: Nathan MacKinnon, Bowen Byram · Wrist, 0.17 xG1–0
  2. P2 6:34TBLMathieu JosephAssists: Anthony Cirelli, Alex Killorn · Backhand, 0.11 xG1–1
  3. P2 11:51COLMikko RantanenAssists: Nathan MacKinnon, Cale Makar · Snap, 0.10 xG2–1
  4. P3 3:44TBLSteven StamkosAssists: Ondrej Palat, Ryan McDonagh · Tip-in, 0.22 xG2–2
  5. P3 9:50COLNathan MacKinnonPPAssists: Cale Makar, Gabriel Landeskog · Slap, 0.04 xG3–2
  6. P3 17:25TBLBrayden PointAssists: Victor Hedman, Steven Stamkos · Wrist, 0.06 xG3–3

Shootout

  1. 1. TBL Victor Hedman scored
  2. 2. COL Nathan MacKinnon stopped
  3. 3. TBL Brayden Point stopped
  4. 4. COL Mikko Rantanen scored
  5. 5. TBL Ross Colton stopped
  6. 6. COL Andre Burakovsky stopped
  7. 7. TBL Steven Stamkos scored
  8. 8. COL Gabriel Landeskog scored
  9. 9. TBL Corey Perry stopped
  10. 10. COL Nazem Kadri stopped
  11. 11. TBL Anthony Cirelli stopped
  12. 12. COL Cale Makar scored
Penalties (11)
  1. P1 0:36TBLOndrej Palat: Tripping2 min
  2. P1 3:46TBLMikhail Sergachev: Holding2 min
  3. P1 11:39COLAndre Burakovsky: Interference2 min
  4. P1 13:42COLErik Johnson: Tripping2 min
  5. P2 0:30TBLAlex Killorn: Interference2 min
  6. P2 7:06TBLVictor Hedman: Holding2 min
  7. P2 12:23TBLAlex Killorn: Cross checking2 min
  8. P2 13:45COLTyson Jost: Interference2 min
  9. P2 19:33COLMikko Rantanen: Roughing2 min
  10. P2 19:33TBLAlex Killorn: Roughing2 min
  11. P3 9:45TBLAndrei Vasilevskiy: Tripping2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

COL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0TBL
48% to win52% to win
← COL attackTBL attack →
  1. P1 20:00MacKinnon won the faceoff against Cirelli
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

COLTBL
27Shots on goal32
3.4Expected goals3.0
51Shot attempts56
31Faceoffs won34
6Power plays3
8Penalty minutes14
32Hits43
7Blocked shots12
3Giveaways3
2Takeaways4

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Colorado Avalanche

Forward lines

  1. bestLandeskog – MacKinnon – Rantanen13:45

    xG 0.43–0.27 (62%)attempts 7–12goals 2–0

  2. Kadri – Compher – Jost3:19

    xG 0.04–0.07 (38%)attempts 2–1goals 0–0

  3. Helm – Jost – O'Connor3:00

    xG 0.05–0.09 (35%)attempts 2–1goals 0–0

  4. Kadri – Burakovsky – Compher4:32

    xG 0.00–0.14 (0%)attempts 0–4goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestJohnson – Byram2:40

    xG 0.45–0.07 (87%)attempts 7–1goals 0–0

  2. Makar – Byram13:43

    xG 0.31–0.25 (56%)attempts 6–12goals 1–1

  3. Johnson – Murray9:42

    xG 0.05–0.39 (11%)attempts 1–7goals 0–0

Tampa Bay Lightning

Forward lines

  1. bestPerry – Maroon – Colton7:33

    xG 0.44–0.16 (74%)attempts 7–5goals 0–0

  2. Bellemare – Katchouk – Raddysh5:39

    xG 0.13–0.05 (71%)attempts 4–2goals 0–0

  3. Killorn – Joseph – Cirelli9:57

    xG 0.30–0.37 (45%)attempts 9–3goals 1–1

  4. Stamkos – Palat – Point11:29

    xG 0.47–0.75 (39%)attempts 11–11goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestMcDonagh – Cernak12:03

    xG 0.51–0.34 (60%)attempts 12–5goals 1–2

  2. Sustr – Sergachev5:53

    xG 0.25–0.10 (72%)attempts 4–2goals 1–0

  3. Sergachev – Rutta2:21

    xG 0.07–0.00 (100%)attempts 1–1goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

TBL 3.0 xGCOL 3.4 xG
01234P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

TBLCOL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

TBL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line TBL is favoured, below it COL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 94/100 · #93 of 1312 this seasonSwing 2.77 · 6 goals in reachComeback index 47% (winner's lowest chance)
COL 100%5050%50TBL 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +44 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Colorado Avalanche win this game 55% of the time.

TBL winsCOL wins

Simulated goal difference (TBL − COL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).