Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sun, Jan 2, 2022·PPG Paints Arena, Pittsburgh

San Jose Sharks 5, Pittsburgh Penguins 8

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 90% of the time.

PIT winsSJS wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
SJS11017310527
PIT61708214839

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 1:03PITEvan RodriguesAssists: Marcus Pettersson, Danton Heinen · Wrist, 0.08 xG0–1
  2. P1 3:12PITJake GuentzelAssists: Bryan Rust, Sidney Crosby · Snap, 0.05 xG0–2
  3. P1 4:11PITEvan RodriguesAssists: Danton Heinen, Dominik Simon · Backhand, 0.10 xG0–3
  4. P1 6:09PITBryan RustAssists: Kris Letang, Brian Dumoulin · Wrist, 0.12 xG0–4
  5. P1 15:33SJSAlexander BarabanovAssists: Timo Meier, Marc-Edouard Vlasic · Wrist, 0.12 xG1–4
  6. P1 16:29PITKasper BjorkqvistAssists: Radim Zohorna, Sam Lafferty · Wrist, 0.17 xG1–5
  7. P1 19:32PITBryan RustGWGAssists: John Marino, Marcus Pettersson · Tip-in, 0.02 xG1–6
  8. P2 14:27SJSBrent BurnsPPAssists: Nick Bonino, Noah Gregor · Slap, 0.04 xG2–6
  9. P3 0:20SJSMatt NietoAssists: Jake Middleton, Andrew Cogliano · Slap, 0.06 xG3–6
  10. P3 3:01SJSJake MiddletonAssists: Erik Karlsson, Timo Meier · Tip-in, 0.09 xG4–6
  11. P3 4:09SJSLogan CoutureAssists: Timo Meier · Snap, 0.13 xG5–6
  12. P3 17:59PITEvan RodriguesPPAssists: Kris Letang, Bryan Rust · Snap, 0.09 xG5–7
  13. P3 19:49PITBryan RustENAssists: Sidney Crosby, Jake Guentzel · Wrist, 0.64 xG5–8
Penalties (5)
  1. P2 12:31PITDominik Simon: Hooking2 min · PPG
  2. P2 17:18SJSRadim Simek: Holding2 min
  3. P3 7:11PITDominik Simon: Hooking2 min
  4. P3 7:25SJSLogan Couture: Hooking2 min
  5. P3 17:08SJSMatt Nieto: Hooking2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

SJS00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0PIT
48% to win52% to win
← SJS attackPIT attack →
  1. P1 20:00Couture won the faceoff against Crosby
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

SJSPIT
27Shots on goal39
1.9Expected goals5.1
48Shot attempts75
42Faceoffs won22
2Power plays3
6Penalty minutes4
51Hits32
12Blocked shots9
2Giveaways4
4Takeaways3

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

San Jose Sharks

Forward lines

  1. bestCouture – Meier – Dahlen3:08

    xG 0.15–0.05 (74%)attempts 4–1goals 0–0

  2. Couture – Hertl – Meier4:38

    xG 0.42–0.36 (54%)attempts 9–7goals 2–0

  3. Hertl – Gregor – Barabanov3:18

    xG 0.12–0.11 (53%)attempts 4–3goals 0–0

  4. Pederson – Viel – Gadjovich7:46

    xG 0.00–0.12 (0%)attempts 0–6goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. Burns – Karlsson2:43

    xG 0.05–0.05 (46%)attempts 3–2goals 0–0

  2. Burns – Simek13:49

    xG 0.53–0.90 (37%)attempts 8–15goals 1–1

  3. Karlsson – Middleton16:27

    xG 0.76–1.33 (36%)attempts 21–27goals 2–1

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestHeinen – Rodrigues – Simon11:49

    xG 1.01–0.38 (73%)attempts 18–13goals 2–2

  2. McGinn – Aston-Reese – O'Connor12:08

    xG 0.93–0.45 (67%)attempts 15–14goals 0–1

  3. Crosby – Rust – Guentzel14:42

    xG 1.01–0.64 (61%)attempts 18–12goals 3–1

  4. Lafferty – Bjorkqvist – Zohorna7:45

    xG 0.25–0.01 (97%)attempts 7–1goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestMatheson – Ruhwedel12:49

    xG 1.51–0.31 (83%)attempts 26–5goals 3–1

  2. Letang – Dumoulin20:05

    xG 1.05–0.48 (69%)attempts 18–17goals 1–1

  3. Pettersson – Marino13:40

    xG 0.81–0.70 (53%)attempts 17–18goals 2–2

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

PIT 5.1 xGSJS 1.9 xG
012345P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

PITSJS

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

PIT's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line PIT is favoured, below it SJS. Dots are goals.

Excitement 94/100 · #90 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.00 · 10 goals in reach · 4-goal lead cutComeback index 52% (winner's lowest chance)
SJS 100%5050%50PIT 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +22 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 90% of the time.

PIT winsSJS wins

Simulated goal difference (PIT − SJS), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).