Skip to content
Ice Lab

Mon, Nov 28, 2022·KeyBank Center, Buffalo

Tampa Bay Lightning 6, Buffalo Sabres 5 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Buffalo Sabres win this game 58% of the time.

BUF winsTBL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
TBL2411021011625
BUF2141821005537

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 7:54TBLBrayden PointPPAssists: Nikita Kucherov, Brandon Hagel · Wrist, 0.23 xG1–0
  2. P1 16:48TBLCorey PerryAssists: Steven Stamkos · Wrist, 0.13 xG2–0
  3. P1 17:54BUFTage ThompsonUnassisted · Wrist, 0.21 xG2–1
  4. P1 18:53BUFJack QuinnAssists: JJ Peterka, Owen Power · Wrist, 0.11 xG2–2
  5. P2 9:07BUFTyson JostAssists: Kyle Okposo, Zemgus Girgensons · Wrist, 0.16 xG2–3
  6. P2 16:26TBLBrayden PointPPAssists: Nikita Kucherov, Mikhail Sergachev · Snap, 0.18 xG3–3
  7. P3 9:37BUFDylan CozensAssists: Rasmus Dahlin, Mattias Samuelsson · Snap, 0.07 xG3–4
  8. P3 14:19BUFJeff SkinnerAssists: Tage Thompson, Alex Tuch · Wrist, 0.05 xG3–5
  9. P3 14:35TBLSteven StamkosAssists: Alex Killorn, Mikhail Sergachev · Wrist, 0.21 xG4–5
  10. P3 17:58TBLBrandon HagelPPAssists: Nikita Kucherov, Mikhail Sergachev · Slap, 0.36 xG5–5
  11. OT 2:44TBLSteven StamkosGWGAssists: Nick Paul · Snap, 0.06 xG6–5
Penalties (7)
  1. P1 4:50TBLCole Koepke: Tripping2 min
  2. P1 6:26BUFJJ Peterka: Too many men on the ice2 min · PPG
  3. P2 14:58BUFMattias Samuelsson: High sticking2 min · PPG
  4. P3 15:27TBLNikita Kucherov: Interference goalkeeper2 min
  5. P3 15:27BUFRasmus Dahlin: Roughing2 min
  6. P3 16:47BUFTyson Jost: Hooking2 min · PPG
  7. P3 18:23BUFOwen Power: Delaying game puck over glass2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

TBL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0BUF
49% to win51% to win
← TBL attackBUF attack →
  1. P1 20:00Cozens won the faceoff against Stamkos
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

TBLBUF
25Shots on goal37
3.9Expected goals4.4
56Shot attempts59
36Faceoffs won24
4Power plays1
4Penalty minutes10
25Hits8
10Blocked shots9
8Giveaways3
9Takeaways6

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Tampa Bay Lightning

Forward lines

  1. bestKucherov – Point – Hagel14:07

    xG 0.40–0.19 (68%)attempts 10–8goals 0–0

  2. Perry – Namestnikov – Colton3:03

    xG 0.22–0.15 (60%)attempts 3–3goals 0–2

  3. Perry – Kucherov – Namestnikov2:01

    xG 0.15–0.09 (62%)attempts 5–1goals 0–0

  4. Maroon – Colton – Koepke6:45

    xG 0.16–0.23 (41%)attempts 3–4goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestSergachev – Perbix7:48

    xG 0.69–0.00 (100%)attempts 8–0goals 1–0

  2. Cole – Bogosian8:43

    xG 0.54–0.41 (57%)attempts 12–7goals 1–1

  3. Cernak – Sergachev2:03

    xG 0.00–0.00attempts 0–0goals 0–0

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. bestCozens – Quinn – Peterka11:02

    xG 1.20–0.22 (85%)attempts 15–10goals 2–0

  2. Okposo – Girgensons – Jost11:48

    xG 0.53–0.32 (63%)attempts 10–7goals 1–0

  3. Skinner – Tuch – Thompson12:51

    xG 0.51–0.59 (47%)attempts 10–10goals 1–0

  4. Olofsson – Asplund – Mittelstadt6:55

    xG 0.03–0.82 (4%)attempts 2–11goals 0–2

Defence pairs

  1. bestJokiharju – Power16:11

    xG 1.22–1.06 (53%)attempts 18–12goals 2–2

  2. Samuelsson – Dahlin20:38

    xG 0.52–0.49 (52%)attempts 13–17goals 2–0

  3. Fitzgerald – Lyubushkin8:24

    xG 0.37–0.40 (48%)attempts 5–7goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

BUF 4.4 xGTBL 3.9 xG
012345P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

BUFTBL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

BUF's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line BUF is favoured, below it TBL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 99/100 · #17 of 1312 this seasonSwing 2.78 · 11 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 3% (winner's lowest chance)
TBL 100%5050%50BUF 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +37 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Buffalo Sabres win this game 58% of the time.

BUF winsTBL wins

Simulated goal difference (BUF − TBL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).