Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Jan 21, 2023·Scotiabank Saddledome, Calgary

Tampa Bay Lightning 3, Calgary Flames 6

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Calgary Flames win this game 83% of the time.

CGY winsTBL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
TBL04210110324
CGY115216310641

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 17:58CGYNazem KadriPPAssists: Tyler Toffoli, Rasmus Andersson · Tip-in, 0.07 xG0–1
  2. P2 10:20TBLSteven StamkosUnassisted · Snap, 0.18 xG1–1
  3. P2 11:08TBLVladislav NamestnikovAssists: Nick Paul, Patrick Maroon · Deflected, 0.11 xG2–1
  4. P2 12:18CGYTyler ToffoliAssists: Elias Lindholm, Dillon Dube · Wrap-around, 0.05 xG2–2
  5. P2 17:20CGYRasmus AnderssonAssists: Andrew Mangiapane, Mikael Backlund · Wrist, 0.01 xG2–3
  6. P3 7:40CGYDillon DubeGWGAssists: Rasmus Andersson, Noah Hanifin · Wrist, 0.04 xG2–4
  7. P3 15:58TBLAnthony CirelliAssists: Victor Hedman, Nikita Kucherov · Wrist, 0.24 xG3–4
  8. P3 17:44CGYJonathan HuberdeauENAssists: Milan Lucic, Noah Hanifin · Wrist, 0.80 xG3–5
  9. P3 19:13CGYBlake ColemanENAssists: Noah Hanifin, Mikael Backlund · Snap, 0.76 xG3–6
Penalties (16)
  1. P1 8:47CGYMacKenzie Weegar: Elbowing2 min
  2. P1 11:34CGYMilan Lucic: Fighting5 min
  3. P1 11:34TBLIan Cole: Fighting5 min
  4. P1 15:28TBLAnthony Cirelli: Hooking2 min
  5. P1 17:52TBLErik Cernak: Roughing2 min · PPG
  6. P1 18:42TBLNikita Kucherov: Tripping2 min
  7. P1 18:42TBLZach Bogosian: Roughing2 min
  8. P2 2:28CGYChris Tanev: Tripping2 min
  9. P2 13:18CGYNazem Kadri: Roughing removing opponents helmet2 min
  10. P2 15:29TBLCorey Perry: Holding2 min
  11. P2 15:29CGYNikita Zadorov: Roughing2 min
  12. P2 15:29TBLNick Paul: Roughing2 min
  13. P2 15:29CGYDillon Dube: Roughing2 min
  14. P2 15:29TBLCorey Perry: Misconduct10 min
  15. P3 0:22CGYTyler Toffoli: Hooking2 min
  16. P3 9:07CGYBlake Coleman: High sticking double minor4 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

TBL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CGY
49% to win51% to win
← TBL attackCGY attack →
  1. P1 20:00Lindholm won the faceoff against Point
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

TBLCGY
24Shots on goal41
3.3Expected goals5.8
53Shot attempts72
40Faceoffs won22
6Power plays4
27Penalty minutes21
20Hits22
18Blocked shots15
15Giveaways10
6Takeaways11

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Tampa Bay Lightning

Forward lines

  1. bestMaroon – Paul – Colton7:10

    xG 0.39–0.15 (72%)attempts 6–3goals 0–0

  2. Killorn – Stamkos – Cirelli7:08

    xG 0.33–0.37 (47%)attempts 5–10goals 1–0

  3. Stamkos – Kucherov – Point4:44

    xG 0.08–0.32 (19%)attempts 2–8goals 0–0

  4. Perry – Namestnikov – Bellemare2:52

    xG 0.11–0.35 (23%)attempts 1–5goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestSergachev – Foote9:58

    xG 0.72–0.32 (70%)attempts 8–11goals 1–0

  2. Cole – Cernak8:33

    xG 0.31–0.27 (54%)attempts 8–8goals 1–1

  3. Cernak – Sergachev3:45

    xG 0.11–0.14 (45%)attempts 3–3goals 0–0

Calgary Flames

Forward lines

  1. bestBacklund – Coleman – Mangiapane9:28

    xG 0.84–0.42 (66%)attempts 15–4goals 1–0

  2. Lewis – Pelletier – Duehr3:55

    xG 0.41–0.00 (100%)attempts 5–1goals 0–0

  3. Toffoli – Lindholm – Dube7:01

    xG 0.43–0.10 (82%)attempts 8–6goals 2–0

  4. Lucic – Kadri – Huberdeau8:45

    xG 0.37–0.23 (62%)attempts 9–5goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestTanev – Weegar13:31

    xG 0.81–0.31 (72%)attempts 23–8goals 0–1

  2. Hanifin – Andersson15:17

    xG 1.16–0.71 (62%)attempts 19–8goals 2–1

  3. Stone – Zadorov8:34

    xG 0.35–0.35 (51%)attempts 5–9goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CGY 5.8 xGTBL 3.3 xG
0123456P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CGYTBL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CGY's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CGY is favoured, below it TBL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 85/100 · #240 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.99 · 9 goals in reachComeback index 29% (winner's lowest chance)
TBL 100%5050%50CGY 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +24 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Calgary Flames win this game 83% of the time.

CGY winsTBL wins

Simulated goal difference (CGY − TBL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).