Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Jan 11, 2024·KeyBank Center, Buffalo

Ottawa Senators 3, Buffalo Sabres 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Buffalo Sabres win this game 84% of the time.

BUF winsOTT wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
OTT1908211328
BUF31018114532

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 9:14BUFJJ PeterkaAssists: Dylan Cozens, Owen Power · Wrist, 0.13 xG0–1
  2. P1 15:06OTTVladimir TarasenkoUnassisted · Wrist, 0.01 xG1–1
  3. P1 17:28BUFTage ThompsonAssists: Rasmus Dahlin · Wrist, 0.04 xG1–2
  4. P1 19:32BUFTage ThompsonPPAssists: Rasmus Dahlin, Jack Quinn · Wrist, 0.04 xG1–3
  5. P2 4:52BUFPeyton KrebsGWGAssists: Eric Robinson · Wrist, 0.15 xG1–4
  6. P3 0:43OTTClaude GirouxAssists: Ridly Greig · Backhand, 0.09 xG2–4
  7. P3 11:15OTTClaude GirouxUnassisted · Slap, 0.04 xG3–4
  8. P3 19:57BUFDylan CozensENUnassisted · Wrist, 0.68 xG3–5
Penalties (7)
  1. P1 7:12OTTMark Kastelic: Tripping2 min
  2. P1 11:35BUFRasmus Dahlin: Holding2 min
  3. P1 19:08OTTDominik Kubalik: Tripping2 min · PPG
  4. P2 2:41BUFRyan Johnson: Interference2 min
  5. P2 9:46BUFZemgus Girgensons: Tripping2 min
  6. P2 15:39BUFRasmus Dahlin: Cross checking2 min
  7. P3 1:32OTTMathieu Joseph: Boarding2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

OTT00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0BUF
46% to win54% to win
← OTT attackBUF attack →
  1. P1 20:00Giroux won the faceoff against Cozens
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

OTTBUF
28Shots on goal32
1.4Expected goals3.3
67Shot attempts51
28Faceoffs won28
4Power plays3
6Penalty minutes8
27Hits28
14Blocked shots27
4Giveaways6
4Takeaways7

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Ottawa Senators

Forward lines

  1. Tarasenko – Kubalik – Joseph4:26

    xG 0.03–0.01 (68%)attempts 4–2goals 0–0

  2. Giroux – Tkachuk – Greig10:11

    xG 0.44–0.46 (49%)attempts 16–7goals 2–0

  3. Batherson – Kelly – Stützle6:53

    xG 0.22–0.27 (44%)attempts 9–4goals 0–0

  4. Joseph – Batherson – Stützle4:45

    xG 0.01–0.11 (5%)attempts 4–9goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestChabot – Zub13:22

    xG 0.23–0.10 (71%)attempts 18–7goals 1–1

  2. Bernard-Docker – Sanderson2:10

    xG 0.06–0.00 (100%)attempts 4–0goals 1–0

  3. Brannstrom – Bernard-Docker4:08

    xG 0.06–0.00 (100%)attempts 5–3goals 0–0

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. bestGirgensons – Robinson – Krebs7:12

    xG 0.84–0.13 (87%)attempts 13–6goals 1–0

  2. Okposo – Greenway – Benson7:31

    xG 0.55–0.04 (94%)attempts 9–5goals 0–0

  3. Tuch – Thompson – Mittelstadt8:11

    xG 0.43–0.03 (94%)attempts 8–6goals 1–1

  4. Cozens – Quinn – Peterka9:49

    xG 0.08–0.51 (14%)attempts 4–20goals 0–2

Defence pairs

  1. bestJohnson – Power6:30

    xG 0.60–0.11 (85%)attempts 9–7goals 0–2

  2. Samuelsson – Dahlin14:33

    xG 0.58–0.53 (52%)attempts 12–16goals 0–1

  3. Dahlin – Power2:37

    xG 0.05–0.02 (70%)attempts 3–3goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

BUF 3.3 xGOTT 1.4 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

BUFOTT

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

BUF's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line BUF is favoured, below it OTT. Dots are goals.

Excitement 76/100 · #361 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.30 · 8 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 52% (winner's lowest chance)
OTT 100%5050%50BUF 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +19 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Buffalo Sabres win this game 84% of the time.

BUF winsOTT wins

Simulated goal difference (BUF − OTT), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).