Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Jan 18, 2024·Amalie Arena, Tampa

Minnesota Wild 3, Tampa Bay Lightning 7

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Tampa Bay Lightning win this game 72% of the time.

TBL winsMIN wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
MIN111210012333
TBL111314313738

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 5:17MINJoel Eriksson EkAssists: Brock Faber, Jake Middleton · Wrist, 0.07 xG1–0
  2. P1 6:12TBLVictor HedmanAssists: Brayden Point, Nikita Kucherov · Slap, 0.01 xG1–1
  3. P2 0:16TBLAnthony CirelliPPAssists: Brayden Point, Victor Hedman · Wrist, 0.07 xG1–2
  4. P2 3:20TBLWaltteri MerelaAssists: Conor Sheary, Nick Perbix · Snap, 0.24 xG1–3
  5. P2 10:52MINMarco RossiAssists: Jake Middleton, Kirill Kaprizov · Wrist, 0.18 xG2–3
  6. P2 12:41TBLBrayden PointGWGAssists: Nikita Kucherov · Wrist, 0.22 xG2–4
  7. P2 19:45MINJake MiddletonAssists: Marco Rossi, Mats Zuccarello · Backhand, 0.14 xG3–4
  8. P3 1:09TBLSteven StamkosPPAssists: Nikita Kucherov, Victor Hedman · Slap, 0.09 xG3–5
  9. P3 6:59TBLMichael EyssimontPPAssists: Anthony Cirelli, Darren Raddysh · Wrist, 0.28 xG3–6
  10. P3 17:52TBLAnthony CirelliAssists: Brandon Hagel, Victor Hedman · Wrist, 0.16 xG3–7
Penalties (9)
  1. P1 18:16MINBrock Faber: Roughing2 min · PPG
  2. P1 18:16TBLNick Paul: Roughing2 min
  3. P1 18:16MINBrock Faber: Cross checking2 min
  4. P2 0:00MINMarcus Johansson: High sticking2 min · PPG
  5. P3 2:53TBLTyler Motte: Hooking2 min
  6. P3 5:45MINKirill Kaprizov: Tripping2 min · PPG
  7. P3 12:44TBLCalvin de Haan: Cross checking2 min
  8. P3 12:44MINMats Zuccarello: Roughing2 min
  9. P3 12:44TBLCalvin de Haan: Roughing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

MIN00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0TBL
46% to win54% to win
← MIN attackTBL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Eriksson Ek won the faceoff against Stamkos
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

MINTBL
33Shots on goal38
2.7Expected goals4.1
63Shot attempts67
19Faceoffs won34
2Power plays3
10Penalty minutes8
23Hits26
13Blocked shots17
5Giveaways5
5Takeaways10

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestZuccarello – Kaprizov – Rossi13:32

    xG 0.68–0.16 (81%)attempts 10–11goals 2–0

  2. Maroon – Duhaime – Dewar8:51

    xG 0.12–0.31 (28%)attempts 8–7goals 0–1

  3. Johansson – Eriksson Ek – Boldy8:02

    xG 0.43–0.77 (36%)attempts 11–13goals 0–2

  4. Foligno – Hartman – Gaudreau8:22

    xG 0.07–0.50 (12%)attempts 10–11goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestMermis – Hunt13:03

    xG 0.86–0.52 (62%)attempts 21–10goals 0–1

  2. Middleton – Faber14:32

    xG 0.71–1.14 (38%)attempts 15–18goals 3–2

  3. Bogosian – Brodin20:02

    xG 0.34–0.98 (26%)attempts 17–25goals 0–1

Tampa Bay Lightning

Forward lines

  1. bestStamkos – Kucherov – Point14:13

    xG 1.61–0.66 (71%)attempts 24–19goals 2–0

  2. Motte – Sheary – Eyssimont8:09

    xG 0.32–0.11 (75%)attempts 10–10goals 0–0

  3. Paul – Cirelli – Hagel12:12

    xG 0.38–0.48 (44%)attempts 13–8goals 1–3

  4. Watson – Glendening – Merela6:36

    xG 0.03–0.57 (4%)attempts 3–9goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestHedman – Raddysh14:45

    xG 1.67–0.83 (67%)attempts 24–19goals 3–0

  2. Crozier – Lilleberg14:31

    xG 0.30–0.11 (74%)attempts 15–9goals 0–0

  3. Raddysh – Lilleberg2:14

    xG 0.05–0.08 (37%)attempts 1–6goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

TBL 4.1 xGMIN 2.7 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

TBLMIN

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

TBL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line TBL is favoured, below it MIN. Dots are goals.

Excitement 75/100 · #377 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.43 · 9 goals in reachComeback index 39% (winner's lowest chance)
MIN 100%5050%50TBL 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +20 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Tampa Bay Lightning win this game 72% of the time.

TBL winsMIN wins

Simulated goal difference (TBL − MIN), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).