Skip to content
Ice Lab

Wed, Mar 6, 2024·Scotiabank Arena, Toronto

Buffalo Sabres 1, Toronto Maple Leafs 2 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Toronto Maple Leafs win this game 54% of the time.

TOR winsBUF wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
BUF010190303125
TOR061901012227

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P2 2:29TORWilliam NylanderAssists: Tyler Bertuzzi, Max Domi · Wrist, 0.11 xG0–1
  2. P2 6:31BUFVictor OlofssonAssists: Zemgus Girgensons · Snap, 0.05 xG1–1
  3. OT 4:20TORAuston MatthewsGWGAssists: Mitch Marner, Morgan Rielly · Snap, 0.26 xG1–2
Penalties (3)
  1. P1 15:44TORTimothy Liljegren: Hooking2 min
  2. P2 7:11BUFRasmus Dahlin: Hooking2 min
  3. P2 12:07TORTimothy Liljegren: Holding2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

BUF00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0TOR
46% to win54% to win
← BUF attackTOR attack →
  1. P1 20:00Girgensons won the faceoff against Matthews
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

BUFTOR
25Shots on goal27
3.0Expected goals3.1
58Shot attempts47
20Faceoffs won31
2Power plays1
2Penalty minutes4
34Hits38
8Blocked shots17
16Giveaways15
7Takeaways10

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. bestSkinner – Tuch – Thompson12:19

    xG 0.51–0.38 (58%)attempts 11–8goals 0–0

  2. Okposo – Girgensons – Robinson11:56

    xG 0.72–0.62 (54%)attempts 16–5goals 0–0

  3. Girgensons – Olofsson – Robinson2:05

    xG 0.01–0.05 (11%)attempts 1–2goals 0–0

  4. Olofsson – Krebs – Benson6:16

    xG 0.00–0.32 (0%)attempts 0–5goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestClifton – Power2:46

    xG 0.21–0.00 (100%)attempts 4–0goals 0–0

  2. Bryson – Power15:36

    xG 0.29–0.29 (50%)attempts 9–8goals 0–0

  3. Clifton – Johnson6:33

    xG 0.00–0.37 (0%)attempts 3–8goals 0–1

Toronto Maple Leafs

Forward lines

  1. bestTavares – Jarnkrok – McMann10:13

    xG 1.10–0.47 (70%)attempts 12–8goals 0–0

  2. Marner – Matthews – Knies13:33

    xG 0.63–0.18 (78%)attempts 9–7goals 0–0

  3. Reaves – Gregor – Kampf5:13

    xG 0.33–0.32 (51%)attempts 5–8goals 0–1

  4. Bertuzzi – Domi – Nylander9:37

    xG 0.19–0.26 (42%)attempts 7–7goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestBrodie – Lyubushkin2:47

    xG 0.84–0.00 (100%)attempts 6–0goals 0–0

  2. Rielly – Lyubushkin14:05

    xG 0.56–0.06 (91%)attempts 12–6goals 1–0

  3. Lagesson – Benoit13:01

    xG 0.25–0.26 (49%)attempts 7–13goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

TOR 3.1 xGBUF 3.0 xG
0123P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

TORBUF

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

TOR's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line TOR is favoured, below it BUF. Dots are goals.

Excitement 21/100 · #1065 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.08 · 3 goals in reachComeback index 51% (winner's lowest chance)
BUF 100%5050%50TOR 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +20 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Toronto Maple Leafs win this game 54% of the time.

TOR winsBUF wins

Simulated goal difference (TOR − BUF), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).