Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Mar 7, 2024·Amalie Arena, Tampa

Calgary Flames 6, Tampa Bay Lightning 3

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Calgary Flames win this game 68% of the time.

TBL winsCGY wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
CGY173829624
TBL1616110322

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 11:40CGYDryden HuntAssists: Yegor Sharangovich · Wrist, 0.18 xG1–0
  2. P1 14:28TBLConor ShearyAssists: Nick Paul, Victor Hedman · Tip-in, 0.07 xG1–1
  3. P2 6:11CGYYegor SharangovichAssists: Jonathan Huberdeau, MacKenzie Weegar · Wrist, 0.07 xG2–1
  4. P2 8:34CGYYegor SharangovichAssists: Matt Coronato · Slap, 0.13 xG3–1
  5. P2 9:25CGYJakob PelletierGWGAssists: Andrei Kuzmenko, Joel Hanley · Wrist, 0.11 xG4–1
  6. P2 12:29TBLAnthony CirelliAssists: Steven Stamkos, Nikita Kucherov · Snap, 0.30 xG4–2
  7. P3 6:04CGYBlake ColemanAssists: Yegor Sharangovich, Jonathan Huberdeau · Tip-in, 0.18 xG5–2
  8. P3 12:17CGYAndrew MangiapaneENAssists: Mikael Backlund, MacKenzie Weegar · Wrist, 0.54 xG6–2
  9. P3 14:35TBLMichael EyssimontAssists: Conor Sheary, Nick Paul · Wrist, 0.05 xG6–3
Penalties (10)
  1. P1 3:16TBLErik Cernak: Holding2 min
  2. P1 16:06CGYNazem Kadri: Roughing2 min
  3. P1 16:06CGYNazem Kadri: Roughing2 min
  4. P1 16:06TBLMichael Eyssimont: Roughing2 min
  5. P2 9:25TBLMichael Eyssimont: Delaying game unsuccessful challenge2 min
  6. P2 10:24CGYNazem Kadri: Tripping2 min
  7. P2 13:58TBLBrandon Hagel: Cross checking2 min
  8. P2 13:58CGYBlake Coleman: Interference2 min
  9. P3 16:41CGYNazem Kadri: High sticking2 min
  10. P3 18:04TBLVictor Hedman: Hooking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

CGY00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0TBL
46% to win54% to win
← CGY attackTBL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Backlund won the faceoff against Cirelli
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

CGYTBL
24Shots on goal22
3.2Expected goals2.1
45Shot attempts57
16Faceoffs won37
3Power plays3
10Penalty minutes10
29Hits32
21Blocked shots9
7Giveaways11
8Takeaways4

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Calgary Flames

Forward lines

  1. bestBacklund – Coleman – Mangiapane13:27

    xG 0.69–0.18 (79%)attempts 8–12goals 0–0

  2. Huberdeau – Sharangovich – Coronato8:47

    xG 0.52–0.36 (59%)attempts 8–8goals 2–0

  3. Hunt – Rooney – Duehr5:11

    xG 0.31–0.30 (51%)attempts 4–8goals 0–2

  4. Kadri – Pelletier – Kuzmenko8:18

    xG 0.25–0.40 (38%)attempts 6–10goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestKylington – Pachal11:56

    xG 0.88–0.30 (75%)attempts 11–9goals 3–0

  2. Hanley – Pachal2:24

    xG 0.20–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–1goals 1–0

  3. Weegar – Pachal3:41

    xG 0.44–0.30 (60%)attempts 7–1goals 0–1

Tampa Bay Lightning

Forward lines

  1. Glendening – Motte – Hagel2:09

    xG 0.03–0.00 (100%)attempts 1–1goals 0–0

  2. Stamkos – Paul – Sheary2:17

    xG 0.02–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–0goals 0–0

  3. Paul – Sheary – Eyssimont4:58

    xG 0.22–0.21 (52%)attempts 10–4goals 2–2

  4. Glendening – Motte – Sheary4:24

    xG 0.19–0.20 (48%)attempts 1–2goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestHedman – Raddysh6:09

    xG 0.20–0.03 (88%)attempts 6–4goals 0–0

  2. de Haan – Crozier3:05

    xG 0.20–0.12 (63%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0

  3. Hedman – Crozier7:06

    xG 0.40–0.33 (55%)attempts 10–4goals 1–2

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

TBL 2.1 xGCGY 3.2 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

TBLCGY

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

TBL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line TBL is favoured, below it CGY. Dots are goals.

Excitement 66/100 · #509 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.16 · 8 goals in reachComeback index 45% (winner's lowest chance)
CGY 100%5050%50TBL 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +20 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Calgary Flames win this game 68% of the time.

TBL winsCGY wins

Simulated goal difference (TBL − CGY), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).