Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Dec 3, 2024·KeyBank Center, Buffalo

Colorado Avalanche 5, Buffalo Sabres 4

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Buffalo Sabres win this game 66% of the time.

BUF winsCOL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
COL09115417541
BUF41201107430

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 3:22BUFTage ThompsonAssists: Connor Clifton, Alex Tuch · Wrist, 0.33 xG0–1
  2. P1 6:39BUFTage ThompsonAssists: Jason Zucker, Bowen Byram · Backhand, 0.07 xG0–2
  3. P1 6:50BUFJJ PeterkaAssists: Zach Benson, Dylan Cozens · Snap, 0.13 xG0–3
  4. P1 11:49BUFBeck MalenstynAssists: Nicolas Aube-Kubel · Backhand, 0.12 xG0–4
  5. P2 2:24COLNathan MacKinnonUnassisted · Wrist, 0.09 xG1–4
  6. P3 1:19COLJoel KivirantaAssists: Calvin de Haan, Logan O'Connor · Wrist, 0.15 xG2–4
  7. P3 4:30COLLogan O'ConnorAssists: Samuel Girard · Snap, 0.07 xG3–4
  8. P3 7:39COLNathan MacKinnonAssists: Mikko Rantanen, Devon Toews · Tip-in, 0.05 xG4–4
  9. P3 15:38COLArtturi LehkonenGWGAssists: Calvin de Haan, Nathan MacKinnon · Wrist, 0.17 xG5–4
Penalties (4)
  1. P1 3:22COLNikolai Kovalenko: Delaying game unsuccessful challenge2 min
  2. P1 9:31COLCalvin de Haan: Tripping2 min
  3. P1 12:57BUFZach Benson: Slashing2 min
  4. P2 19:09COLNikolai Kovalenko: Delaying game puck over glass2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

COL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0BUF
43% to win57% to win
← COL attackBUF attack →
  1. P1 20:00MacKinnon won the faceoff against Thompson
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

COLBUF
41Shots on goal30
3.1Expected goals4.0
75Shot attempts60
29Faceoffs won28
1Power plays3
6Penalty minutes2
24Hits19
13Blocked shots11
15Giveaways16
5Takeaways9

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Colorado Avalanche

Forward lines

  1. bestNichushkin – Mittelstadt – Kovalenko6:47

    xG 0.56–0.19 (74%)attempts 11–6goals 0–1

  2. O'Connor – Kiviranta – Ivan8:53

    xG 0.34–0.11 (76%)attempts 13–5goals 1–0

  3. Wagner – Kelly – Prishchepov2:16

    xG 0.06–0.03 (68%)attempts 3–2goals 0–0

  4. Lehkonen – MacKinnon – Rantanen17:26

    xG 1.48–1.71 (46%)attempts 31–22goals 3–2

Defence pairs

  1. bestGirard – Malinski13:31

    xG 0.66–0.17 (80%)attempts 17–10goals 1–0

  2. de Haan – Ludvig12:09

    xG 0.42–1.06 (28%)attempts 15–14goals 0–2

  3. Toews – Makar19:39

    xG 0.84–1.91 (30%)attempts 22–26goals 2–2

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. bestMcLeod – Quinn – Kulich5:34

    xG 0.70–0.44 (62%)attempts 9–8goals 0–1

  2. Zucker – Tuch – Thompson11:22

    xG 1.08–0.91 (54%)attempts 13–18goals 2–1

  3. Aube-Kubel – Malenstyn – Krebs9:47

    xG 0.49–0.38 (56%)attempts 12–14goals 1–1

  4. Cozens – Peterka – Benson11:45

    xG 0.50–0.65 (44%)attempts 8–18goals 1–2

Defence pairs

  1. bestJokiharju – Bryson4:21

    xG 0.60–0.07 (90%)attempts 6–3goals 0–0

  2. Dahlin – Byram13:10

    xG 1.00–0.54 (65%)attempts 16–15goals 1–0

  3. Jokiharju – Power10:27

    xG 0.67–0.46 (59%)attempts 13–18goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

BUF 4.0 xGCOL 3.1 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

BUFCOL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

BUF's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line BUF is favoured, below it COL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 90/100 · #118 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.59 · 8 goals in reach · 4-goal lead cutComeback index 3% (winner's lowest chance)
COL 100%5050%50BUF 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +42 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Buffalo Sabres win this game 66% of the time.

BUF winsCOL wins

Simulated goal difference (BUF − COL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).