Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Dec 3, 2024·PPG Paints Arena, Pittsburgh

Florida Panthers 4, Pittsburgh Penguins 5 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Florida Panthers win this game 63% of the time.

PIT winsFLA wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
FLA11301131700441
PIT25151511516

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 9:20PITOwen PickeringAssists: Blake Lizotte · Wrist, 0.01 xG0–1
  2. P1 10:32PITEvgeni MalkinAssists: Philip Tomasino, Drew O'Connor · Wrist, 0.11 xG0–2
  3. P1 17:24FLAMatthew TkachukAssists: Aleksander Barkov, Dmitry Kulikov · Wrist, 0.06 xG1–2
  4. P2 6:54PITKris LetangAssists: Matt Grzelcyk, Blake Lizotte · Snap, 0.01 xG1–3
  5. P3 3:45PITMarcus PetterssonAssists: Sidney Crosby, Rickard Rakell · Wrist, 0.19 xG1–4
  6. P3 6:55FLASam BennettAssists: Jesper Boqvist, Matthew Tkachuk · Wrist, 0.12 xG2–4
  7. P3 8:58FLAAdam BoqvistAssists: Matthew Tkachuk, Jesper Boqvist · Wrist, 0.08 xG3–4
  8. P3 11:27FLAMatthew TkachukPPAssists: Aaron Ekblad · Tip-in, 0.16 xG4–4
  9. OT 1:31PITBryan RustGWGAssists: Evgeni Malkin · Wrist, 0.09 xG4–5
Penalties (4)
  1. P2 11:17FLADmitry Kulikov: Slashing2 min
  2. P2 18:37FLAA.J. Greer: Roughing2 min
  3. P2 18:37PITNoel Acciari: Roughing2 min
  4. P3 9:49PITBlake Lizotte: High sticking2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

FLA00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0PIT
43% to win57% to win
← FLA attackPIT attack →
  1. P1 20:00Crosby won the faceoff against Verhaeghe
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

FLAPIT
41Shots on goal16
2.6Expected goals1.9
81Shot attempts46
36Faceoffs won34
1Power plays1
4Penalty minutes4
38Hits14
11Blocked shots21
13Giveaways15
10Takeaways5

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Florida Panthers

Forward lines

  1. bestBarkov – Reinhart – Rodrigues8:19

    xG 0.58–0.31 (65%)attempts 16–4goals 0–1

  2. Verhaeghe – Barkov – Reinhart5:30

    xG 0.26–0.00 (100%)attempts 9–2goals 0–0

  3. Verhaeghe – Bennett – Tkachuk10:36

    xG 0.37–0.12 (75%)attempts 14–6goals 0–0

  4. Nosek – Greer – Gadjovich7:00

    xG 0.39–0.14 (73%)attempts 10–11goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestEkblad – Forsling17:17

    xG 0.91–0.49 (65%)attempts 26–8goals 0–1

  2. Kulikov – Mikkola4:11

    xG 0.23–0.06 (80%)attempts 6–1goals 0–0

  3. Kulikov – Boqvist10:30

    xG 0.52–0.47 (53%)attempts 19–9goals 2–0

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestMalkin – Tomasino – O'Connor12:42

    xG 0.72–0.45 (62%)attempts 10–14goals 1–1

  2. Bunting – Beauvillier – Lizotte10:11

    xG 0.09–0.19 (33%)attempts 10–8goals 2–1

  3. Crosby – Rust – Rakell15:26

    xG 0.39–0.74 (34%)attempts 10–27goals 0–0

  4. Hayes – Nieto – Acciari7:31

    xG 0.03–0.60 (5%)attempts 2–13goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. Letang – Grzelcyk16:41

    xG 0.63–0.60 (51%)attempts 17–17goals 2–1

  2. Shea – Pickering11:06

    xG 0.32–0.38 (45%)attempts 6–15goals 1–1

  3. Karlsson – Pettersson20:23

    xG 0.37–0.98 (28%)attempts 12–33goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

PIT 1.9 xGFLA 2.6 xG
00.511.522.5P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

PITFLA

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

PIT's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line PIT is favoured, below it FLA. Dots are goals.

Excitement 92/100 · #103 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.66 · 9 goals in reach · 3-goal lead cutComeback index 54% (winner's lowest chance)
FLA 100%5050%50PIT 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +29 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Florida Panthers win this game 63% of the time.

PIT winsFLA wins

Simulated goal difference (PIT − FLA), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).