Skip to content
Ice Lab

Mon, Dec 9, 2024·KeyBank Center, Buffalo

Detroit Red Wings 6, Buffalo Sabres 5 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Detroit Red Wings win this game 70% of the time.

BUF winsDET wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
DET29110212002631
BUF3721004001521

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 1:38BUFZach BensonAssists: Dylan Cozens, Peyton Krebs · Wrist, 0.03 xG0–1
  2. P1 4:05DETAlex DeBrincatAssists: Dylan Larkin · Backhand, 0.13 xG1–1
  3. P1 4:46DETAndrew CoppAssists: J.T. Compher, Moritz Seider · Tip-in, 0.12 xG2–1
  4. P1 10:25BUFTage ThompsonAssists: Jason Zucker · Wrist, 0.20 xG2–2
  5. P1 15:26BUFJason ZuckerAssists: Peyton Krebs, Ryan McLeod · Wrist, 0.02 xG2–3
  6. P2 1:05DETLucas RaymondAssists: Dylan Larkin, Erik Gustafsson · Wrist, 0.07 xG3–3
  7. P2 2:26BUFNicolas Aube-KubelAssists: Beck Malenstyn, Owen Power · Wrist, 0.15 xG3–4
  8. P2 9:46BUFJason ZuckerAssists: Ryan McLeod · Wrist, 0.16 xG3–5
  9. P3 10:27DETAndrew CoppAssists: Ben Chiarot, J.T. Compher · Wrist, 0.22 xG4–5
  10. P3 15:42DETMoritz SeiderAssists: Lucas Raymond, Simon Edvinsson · Snap, 0.03 xG5–5

Shootout

  1. 1. BUF Tage Thompson stopped
  2. 2. DET Lucas Raymond scored
  3. 3. BUF JJ Peterka stopped
  4. 4. DET Patrick Kane stopped
  5. 5. BUF Alex Tuch scored
  6. 6. DET Dylan Larkin scored
Penalties (9)
  1. P1 7:59BUFHenri Jokiharju: Roughing2 min
  2. P1 15:37DETAlex DeBrincat: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  3. P1 15:37BUFNicolas Aube-Kubel: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  4. P2 12:25DETMarco Kasper: Hooking2 min
  5. P2 15:31BUFZach Benson: Tripping2 min
  6. P3 5:50BUFConnor Clifton: Interference2 min
  7. P3 5:50DETAndrew Copp: Tripping2 min
  8. P3 6:51BUFBowen Byram: Tripping2 min
  9. P3 17:41DETMoritz Seider: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

DET00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0BUF
43% to win57% to win
← DET attackBUF attack →
  1. P1 20:00Kasper won the faceoff against Thompson
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

DETBUF
31Shots on goal21
3.8Expected goals2.5
72Shot attempts48
35Faceoffs won28
3Power plays2
8Penalty minutes10
12Hits28
11Blocked shots20
9Giveaways14
2Takeaways4

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Detroit Red Wings

Forward lines

  1. bestTarasenko – Copp – Compher9:38

    xG 0.75–0.24 (76%)attempts 18–5goals 2–1

  2. Larkin – DeBrincat – Raymond12:29

    xG 0.67–0.27 (71%)attempts 15–9goals 3–0

  3. Kane – Rasmussen – Kasper10:11

    xG 0.14–0.27 (33%)attempts 7–6goals 0–0

  4. Motte – Veleno – Berggren5:14

    xG 0.10–0.47 (18%)attempts 5–8goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestSeider – Edvinsson15:43

    xG 0.48–0.33 (59%)attempts 16–9goals 2–0

  2. Holl – Gustafsson11:17

    xG 0.38–0.44 (46%)attempts 13–4goals 1–2

  3. Petry – Chiarot14:06

    xG 0.82–0.91 (47%)attempts 14–21goals 2–2

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. bestKrebs – Cozens – Benson9:46

    xG 0.34–0.28 (55%)attempts 10–9goals 1–0

  2. Tuch – Thompson – Peterka8:26

    xG 0.20–0.20 (50%)attempts 3–7goals 0–1

  3. Zucker – Greenway – McLeod8:31

    xG 0.38–0.44 (46%)attempts 8–8goals 0–2

  4. Aube-Kubel – Malenstyn – Kozak7:20

    xG 0.24–0.50 (32%)attempts 3–10goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestJokiharju – Power13:13

    xG 0.59–0.39 (60%)attempts 11–10goals 1–0

  2. Clifton – Bryson8:11

    xG 0.44–0.33 (57%)attempts 11–10goals 1–2

  3. Clifton – Johnson2:16

    xG 0.00–0.05 (0%)attempts 0–2goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

BUF 2.5 xGDET 3.8 xG
01234P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

BUFDET

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

BUF's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line BUF is favoured, below it DET. Dots are goals.

Excitement 98/100 · #28 of 1312 this seasonSwing 2.56 · 10 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 4% (winner's lowest chance)
DET 100%5050%50BUF 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +35 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Detroit Red Wings win this game 70% of the time.

BUF winsDET wins

Simulated goal difference (BUF − DET), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).