Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sun, Feb 9, 2025·Centre Bell, Montreal

Tampa Bay Lightning 5, Montréal Canadiens 3

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Montréal Canadiens win this game 74% of the time.

MTL winsTBL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
TBL262817521
MTL11319113335

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 6:56TBLNick PaulAssists: Brandon Hagel · Backhand, 0.14 xG1–0
  2. P1 10:28TBLVictor HedmanAssists: Gage Goncalves, Anthony Cirelli · Snap, 0.15 xG2–0
  3. P1 18:53MTLBrendan GallagherPPAssists: Alex Newhook, Mike Matheson · Snap, 0.08 xG2–1
  4. P2 1:05TBLBrayden PointPPAssists: Jake Guentzel, Victor Hedman · Snap, 0.16 xG3–1
  5. P2 6:43TBLZemgus GirgensonsGWGAssists: Cam Atkinson, Michael Eyssimont · Snap, 0.27 xG4–1
  6. P2 12:45MTLChristian DvorakAssists: David Savard, Juraj Slafkovský · Snap, 0.05 xG4–2
  7. P3 9:19MTLBrendan GallagherUnassisted · Snap, 0.08 xG4–3
  8. P3 19:44TBLAnthony CirelliENAssists: Jake Guentzel, Brandon Hagel · Snap, 0.78 xG5–3
Penalties (6)
  1. P1 3:08TBLDarren Raddysh: Hooking2 min
  2. P1 3:08MTLPatrik Laine: Holding the stick2 min
  3. P1 16:19TBLVictor Hedman: Penalty shot hooking on breakaway0 min
  4. P1 17:04TBLDarren Raddysh: High sticking2 min · PPG
  5. P1 19:22MTLMike Matheson: Interference2 min · PPG
  6. P3 3:14TBLLuke Glendening: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

TBL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0MTL
43% to win57% to win
← TBL attackMTL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Cirelli won the faceoff against Dach
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

TBLMTL
21Shots on goal35
3.2Expected goals4.8
45Shot attempts84
31Faceoffs won39
1Power plays2
6Penalty minutes4
26Hits29
25Blocked shots16
15Giveaways19
7Takeaways11

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Tampa Bay Lightning

Forward lines

  1. Atkinson – Girgensons – Eyssimont7:47

    xG 0.32–0.27 (54%)attempts 4–8goals 1–0

  2. Guentzel – Cirelli – Hagel2:46

    xG 0.11–0.06 (63%)attempts 3–4goals 0–0

  3. Glendening – Chaffee – Duke6:31

    xG 0.09–0.29 (25%)attempts 2–8goals 0–1

  4. Guentzel – Cirelli – Goncalves9:58

    xG 0.53–1.09 (33%)attempts 10–19goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestMcDonagh – Cernak15:15

    xG 0.83–0.39 (68%)attempts 13–12goals 1–0

  2. Hedman – Raddysh4:18

    xG 0.07–0.21 (24%)attempts 1–4goals 0–0

  3. Raddysh – Lilleberg11:51

    xG 0.36–1.03 (26%)attempts 10–15goals 0–0

Montréal Canadiens

Forward lines

  1. bestAnderson – Dach – Newhook10:06

    xG 1.06–0.50 (68%)attempts 14–13goals 0–1

  2. Evans – Suzuki – Caufield11:46

    xG 1.06–0.54 (66%)attempts 17–6goals 0–0

  3. Armia – Laine – Beck6:04

    xG 0.34–0.00 (100%)attempts 6–1goals 0–0

  4. Gallagher – Dvorak – Slafkovský8:57

    xG 0.73–0.50 (59%)attempts 18–7goals 2–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestSavard – Xhekaj9:50

    xG 0.85–0.42 (67%)attempts 11–8goals 1–1

  2. Matheson – Carrier13:11

    xG 0.85–0.49 (63%)attempts 25–10goals 1–1

  3. Carrier – Struble4:23

    xG 0.27–0.00 (100%)attempts 6–0goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

MTL 4.8 xGTBL 3.2 xG
012345P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

MTLTBL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

MTL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line MTL is favoured, below it TBL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 77/100 · #294 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.41 · 8 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 43% (winner's lowest chance)
TBL 100%5050%50MTL 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +15 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Montréal Canadiens win this game 74% of the time.

MTL winsTBL wins

Simulated goal difference (MTL − TBL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).