Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Oct 11, 2025·Lenovo Center, Raleigh

Philadelphia Flyers 3, Carolina Hurricanes 4 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Carolina Hurricanes win this game 77% of the time.

CAR winsPHI wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
PHI161121500323
CAR01531201111439

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 19:38PHIOwen TippettPPAssists: Travis Konecny, Trevor Zegras · Wrist, 0.17 xG1–0
  2. P2 3:46CARLogan StankovenAssists: Jackson Blake, Alexander Nikishin · Snap, 0.23 xG1–1
  3. P2 6:18PHIBobby BrinkAssists: Noah Cates, Nikita Grebenkin · Snap, 0.09 xG2–1
  4. P2 9:07CARTaylor HallAssists: Eric Robinson · Backhand, 0.09 xG2–2
  5. P2 18:30CARJordan StaalAssists: Jordan Martinook · Snap, 0.15 xG2–3
  6. P3 16:00PHITravis SanheimAssists: Bobby Brink, Tyson Foerster · Snap, 0.10 xG3–3
  7. OT 4:43CARSeth JarvisGWGAssists: Sebastian Aho, Shayne Gostisbehere · Slap, 0.13 xG3–4
Penalties (9)
  1. P1 8:09PHITravis Konecny: Interference2 min
  2. P1 11:08PHIEgor Zamula: Tripping2 min
  3. P1 16:14PHINoah Cates: Slashing2 min
  4. P1 17:53PHIGarnet Hathaway: Roughing2 min
  5. P1 17:53CARJackson Blake: Roughing2 min · PPG
  6. P1 19:29CARJalen Chatfield: Tripping2 min
  7. P2 13:25CARK'Andre Miller: Interference2 min
  8. P3 2:11PHIMatvei Michkov: Roughing2 min
  9. P3 11:42CARJalen Chatfield: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PHI00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CAR
47% to win53% to win
← PHI attackCAR attack →
  1. P1 20:00Cates won the faceoff against Stankoven
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PHICAR
23Shots on goal39
3.0Expected goals5.1
52Shot attempts87
32Faceoffs won37
3Power plays4
10Penalty minutes8
27Hits24
21Blocked shots13
17Giveaways11
5Takeaways2

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Philadelphia Flyers

Forward lines

  1. bestHathaway – Grebenkin – Luchanko6:08

    xG 0.34–0.25 (58%)attempts 5–4goals 0–1

  2. Dvorak – Tippett – Zegras11:52

    xG 0.30–0.37 (45%)attempts 12–12goals 0–0

  3. Cates – Brink – Foerster9:55

    xG 0.46–1.01 (31%)attempts 10–13goals 2–1

  4. Couturier – Konecny – Michkov8:13

    xG 0.25–0.85 (23%)attempts 4–19goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestSanheim – Drysdale2:06

    xG 0.07–0.01 (90%)attempts 3–1goals 0–0

  2. Juulsen – Ginning9:11

    xG 0.43–0.41 (51%)attempts 6–8goals 1–1

  3. Zamula – Drysdale15:14

    xG 0.51–0.82 (38%)attempts 10–15goals 0–1

Carolina Hurricanes

Forward lines

  1. bestSvechnikov – Stankoven – Blake10:39

    xG 0.97–0.19 (84%)attempts 15–11goals 1–0

  2. Staal – Martinook – Carrier10:00

    xG 0.77–0.14 (85%)attempts 17–2goals 1–0

  3. Ehlers – Aho – Jarvis11:55

    xG 0.46–0.39 (54%)attempts 12–12goals 0–1

  4. Hall – Robinson – Kotkaniemi6:22

    xG 0.30–0.23 (56%)attempts 5–3goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestGostisbehere – Nikishin11:15

    xG 1.14–0.28 (80%)attempts 13–9goals 2–1

  2. Slavin – Walker12:02

    xG 0.85–0.16 (84%)attempts 21–4goals 0–0

  3. Chatfield – Miller14:36

    xG 0.65–0.14 (82%)attempts 15–10goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CAR 5.1 xGPHI 3.0 xG
012345P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CARPHI

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CAR's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CAR is favoured, below it PHI. Dots are goals.

Excitement 90/100 · #149 of 1312 this seasonSwing 2.42 · 7 goals in reachComeback index 31% (winner's lowest chance)
PHI 100%5050%50CAR 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +44 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Carolina Hurricanes win this game 77% of the time.

CAR winsPHI wins

Simulated goal difference (CAR − PHI), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).