Skip to content
Ice Lab

Mon, Oct 13, 2025·KeyBank Center, Buffalo

Colorado Avalanche 3, Buffalo Sabres 1

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Colorado Avalanche win this game 63% of the time.

BUF winsCOL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
COL110212015337
BUF11301104128

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 3:14COLNathan MacKinnonAssists: Martin Necas, Brent Burns · Backhand, 0.09 xG1–0
  2. P1 16:32BUFTage ThompsonAssists: Alex Tuch, Rasmus Dahlin · Wrist, 0.03 xG1–1
  3. P2 4:32COLCale MakarGWGAssists: Valeri Nichushkin · Snap, 0.23 xG2–1
  4. P2 11:59COLNathan MacKinnonAssists: Martin Necas, Cale Makar · Wrist, 0.06 xG3–1
Penalties (9)
  1. P1 4:38COLJack Drury: Tripping2 min
  2. P1 8:56COLRoss Colton: Too many men on the ice2 min
  3. P1 13:42BUFRasmus Dahlin: Interference2 min
  4. P1 18:15COLCale Makar: Slashing2 min
  5. P2 8:54BUFAlex Tuch: Tripping2 min
  6. P2 11:38COLBrent Burns: Tripping2 min
  7. P2 11:38BUFAlex Tuch: Embellishment2 min
  8. P3 10:08BUFRasmus Dahlin: Interference2 min
  9. P3 16:12BUFConor Timmins: Delaying game puck over glass2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

COL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0BUF
47% to win53% to win
← COL attackBUF attack →
  1. P1 20:00Nelson won the faceoff against Kozak
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

COLBUF
37Shots on goal28
2.9Expected goals2.2
63Shot attempts66
35Faceoffs won27
4Power plays3
8Penalty minutes10
20Hits11
21Blocked shots11
18Giveaways20
5Takeaways7

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Colorado Avalanche

Forward lines

  1. bestOlofsson – Colton – Drury7:10

    xG 0.49–0.25 (66%)attempts 10–7goals 0–0

  2. Lehkonen – MacKinnon – Necas10:00

    xG 0.35–0.19 (65%)attempts 14–8goals 1–0

  3. Kelly – Kiviranta – Brindley5:48

    xG 0.16–0.06 (73%)attempts 1–7goals 0–0

  4. Nelson – Landeskog – Nichushkin5:05

    xG 0.26–0.58 (31%)attempts 4–7goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestToews – Makar12:11

    xG 0.79–0.58 (58%)attempts 18–14goals 1–0

  2. Solovyov – Malinski8:29

    xG 0.35–0.50 (41%)attempts 3–14goals 0–0

  3. Burns – Manson8:50

    xG 0.10–0.28 (26%)attempts 4–12goals 1–0

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. bestTuch – Thompson – Doan10:58

    xG 0.95–0.45 (68%)attempts 21–11goals 1–0

  2. Malenstyn – Dunne – Kozak5:24

    xG 0.25–0.13 (66%)attempts 9–6goals 0–0

  3. Zucker – McLeod – Krebs8:37

    xG 0.06–0.34 (14%)attempts 7–6goals 0–1

  4. Danforth – Quinn – Kulich9:58

    xG 0.24–0.87 (22%)attempts 7–15goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestBryson – Johnson7:51

    xG 0.65–0.35 (65%)attempts 13–9goals 0–0

  2. Dahlin – Byram15:57

    xG 0.69–0.77 (47%)attempts 19–14goals 1–1

  3. Timmins – Power9:30

    xG 0.22–0.59 (27%)attempts 11–13goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

BUF 2.2 xGCOL 2.9 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

BUFCOL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

BUF's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line BUF is favoured, below it COL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 21/100 · #1101 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.07 · 4 goals in reachComeback index 47% (winner's lowest chance)
COL 100%5050%50BUF 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +17 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Colorado Avalanche win this game 63% of the time.

BUF winsCOL wins

Simulated goal difference (BUF − COL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).