Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Oct 25, 2025·Benchmark International Arena, Tampa

Anaheim Ducks 3, Tampa Bay Lightning 4

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Tampa Bay Lightning win this game 83% of the time.

TBL winsANA wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
ANA015114211340
TBL11229112433

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 9:10TBLJake GuentzelAssists: Brandon Hagel, Anthony Cirelli · Wrist, 0.16 xG0–1
  2. P2 4:42ANAJacob TroubaAssists: Troy Terry, Mason McTavish · Slap, 0.06 xG1–1
  3. P2 12:19TBLJake GuentzelAssists: Brayden Point, Nikita Kucherov · Deflected, 0.13 xG1–2
  4. P2 14:20TBLAnthony CirelliAssists: Brandon Hagel, Victor Hedman · Backhand, 0.14 xG1–3
  5. P3 7:11ANARyan PoehlingAssists: Ross Johnston, Drew Helleson · Tip-in, 0.09 xG2–3
  6. P3 8:10ANATroy TerryAssists: Cutter Gauthier, Leo Carlsson · Wrist, 0.11 xG3–3
  7. P3 16:45TBLAnthony CirelliPPGWGAssists: Nikita Kucherov, Victor Hedman · Wrist, 0.12 xG3–4
Penalties (12)
  1. P1 3:13TBLErik Cernak: Tripping2 min
  2. P1 4:13ANALeo Carlsson: Tripping2 min
  3. P1 9:45TBLPontus Holmberg: Tripping2 min
  4. P1 11:19ANAMason McTavish: Interference2 min
  5. P1 15:58ANARoss Johnston: Tripping2 min
  6. P1 15:58TBLEmil Lilleberg: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  7. P1 15:58ANARoss Johnston: Fighting5 min
  8. P1 15:58TBLEmil Lilleberg: Fighting5 min
  9. P2 17:18ANASam Colangelo: Interference2 min
  10. P3 3:16ANAOlen Zellweger: Hooking2 min
  11. P3 4:47ANACutter Gauthier: Hooking2 min
  12. P3 15:42ANARoss Johnston: Tripping2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

ANA00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0TBL
47% to win53% to win
← ANA attackTBL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Holmberg won the faceoff against Granlund
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

ANATBL
40Shots on goal33
2.5Expected goals5.0
64Shot attempts73
35Faceoffs won38
2Power plays6
19Penalty minutes11
14Hits21
17Blocked shots15
10Giveaways23
8Takeaways5

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Anaheim Ducks

Forward lines

  1. bestTerry – Gauthier – Carlsson5:29

    xG 0.27–0.09 (74%)attempts 9–2goals 1–0

  2. Killorn – Gauthier – Carlsson8:27

    xG 0.29–0.19 (60%)attempts 12–3goals 0–0

  3. Granlund – Terry – Nesterenko2:00

    xG 0.08–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–0goals 0–0

  4. Terry – Poehling – Nesterenko4:10

    xG 0.12–0.20 (37%)attempts 3–4goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. Trouba – LaCombe9:22

    xG 0.64–0.60 (52%)attempts 15–8goals 1–0

  2. Helleson – Mintyukov7:25

    xG 0.26–0.30 (47%)attempts 6–12goals 1–0

  3. Moore – Zellweger2:01

    xG 0.07–0.30 (20%)attempts 2–4goals 0–0

Tampa Bay Lightning

Forward lines

  1. bestGuentzel – Cirelli – Hagel3:15

    xG 0.95–0.29 (76%)attempts 7–5goals 2–1

  2. Kucherov – Guentzel – Point8:39

    xG 0.97–0.35 (74%)attempts 13–11goals 1–1

  3. Kucherov – Cirelli – Hagel2:02

    xG 0.35–0.02 (94%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0

  4. Cirelli – Hagel – James2:44

    xG 0.21–0.13 (62%)attempts 3–4goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestHedman – Moser13:25

    xG 1.81–0.31 (85%)attempts 23–11goals 3–0

  2. McDonagh – Cernak15:14

    xG 1.04–0.70 (60%)attempts 12–18goals 0–2

  3. D'Astous – Lilleberg10:15

    xG 0.21–0.25 (45%)attempts 6–13goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

TBL 5.0 xGANA 2.5 xG
012345P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

TBLANA

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

TBL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line TBL is favoured, below it ANA. Dots are goals.

Excitement 85/100 · #229 of 1312 this seasonSwing 2.10 · 7 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 46% (winner's lowest chance)
ANA 100%5050%50TBL 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +41 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Tampa Bay Lightning win this game 83% of the time.

TBL winsANA wins

Simulated goal difference (TBL − ANA), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).