Skip to content
Ice Lab

Mon, Dec 15, 2025·Benchmark International Arena, Tampa

Florida Panthers 5, Tampa Bay Lightning 2

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Tampa Bay Lightning win this game 52% of the time.

TBL winsFLA wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
FLA2821313524
TBL01315110228

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 2:16FLASam ReinhartSHAssists: Aaron Ekblad · Wrist, 0.08 xG1–0
  2. P1 3:48FLAAnton LundellAssists: Uvis Balinskis, Seth Jones · Wrist, 0.09 xG2–0
  3. P2 11:48FLABrad MarchandGWGAssists: Carter Verhaeghe, Aaron Ekblad · Tip-in, 0.10 xG3–0
  4. P2 18:08FLASam ReinhartPPAssists: Mackie Samoskevich · Snap, 0.14 xG4–0
  5. P2 19:27TBLMax CrozierAssists: Oliver Bjorkstrand, Brayden Point · Slap, 0.04 xG4–1
  6. P3 2:11TBLJ.J. MoserAssists: Brayden Point, Darren Raddysh · Snap, 0.08 xG4–2
  7. P3 6:37FLACarter VerhaegheAssists: Uvis Balinskis · Backhand, 0.19 xG5–2
Penalties (15)
  1. P1 1:41FLANiko Mikkola: Holding2 min
  2. P1 8:40TBLDarren Raddysh: Interference2 min
  3. P2 4:46TBLCharle-Edouard D'Astous: Roughing2 min
  4. P2 4:46FLABrad Marchand: Roughing2 min
  5. P2 4:46TBLMax Crozier: Roughing2 min
  6. P2 8:05FLAGustav Forsling: Interference2 min
  7. P2 12:38FLAGustav Forsling: Tripping2 min
  8. P2 16:35TBLCurtis Douglas: Tripping2 min · PPG
  9. P3 2:11FLAJesper Boqvist: Delaying game unsuccessful challenge2 min
  10. P3 3:52TBLJake Guentzel: Fighting5 min
  11. P3 3:52FLANiko Mikkola: Fighting5 min
  12. P3 14:18FLAEvan Rodrigues: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  13. P3 15:28TBLNikita Kucherov: Interference2 min
  14. P3 15:28FLAUvis Balinskis: Embellishment2 min
  15. P3 19:05TBLYanni Gourde: Slashing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

FLA00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0TBL
47% to win53% to win
← FLA attackTBL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Gourde won the faceoff against Lundell
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

FLATBL
24Shots on goal28
2.0Expected goals2.1
34Shot attempts63
29Faceoffs won33
4Power plays5
19Penalty minutes17
25Hits33
17Blocked shots3
18Giveaways14
5Takeaways5

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Florida Panthers

Forward lines

  1. bestGreer – Rodrigues – Samoskevich12:39

    xG 0.66–0.18 (78%)attempts 10–10goals 0–0

  2. Marchand – Verhaeghe – Bennett8:28

    xG 0.29–0.20 (60%)attempts 3–10goals 2–0

  3. Reinhart – Luostarinen – Lundell8:28

    xG 0.00–0.13 (0%)attempts 0–14goals 0–0

  4. Gregor – Boqvist – Studnicka3:52

    xG 0.01–0.31 (3%)attempts 1–5goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestEkblad – Forsling9:16

    xG 0.43–0.18 (71%)attempts 6–11goals 0–1

  2. Jones – Ekblad3:08

    xG 0.07–0.04 (60%)attempts 2–1goals 0–0

  3. Petry – Balinskis10:54

    xG 0.26–0.24 (52%)attempts 5–15goals 1–1

Tampa Bay Lightning

Forward lines

  1. bestKucherov – Guentzel – Point2:28

    xG 0.19–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–0goals 0–0

  2. Sabourin – Paul – Douglas8:23

    xG 0.21–0.10 (67%)attempts 8–2goals 0–1

  3. Guentzel – Bjorkstrand – Point7:06

    xG 0.24–0.24 (50%)attempts 7–5goals 2–0

  4. Kucherov – Cirelli – Hagel5:34

    xG 0.35–0.38 (48%)attempts 10–4goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestRaddysh – Moser12:21

    xG 0.36–0.02 (94%)attempts 24–3goals 1–0

  2. Crozier – Carlile2:19

    xG 0.23–0.00 (100%)attempts 4–0goals 0–0

  3. D'Astous – Crozier12:24

    xG 0.21–0.49 (30%)attempts 7–6goals 0–2

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

TBL 2.1 xGFLA 2.0 xG
00.511.52P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

TBLFLA

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

TBL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line TBL is favoured, below it FLA. Dots are goals.

Excitement 62/100 · #549 of 1312 this seasonSwing 0.85 · 6 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 45% (winner's lowest chance)
FLA 100%5050%50TBL 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +15 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Tampa Bay Lightning win this game 52% of the time.

TBL winsFLA wins

Simulated goal difference (TBL − FLA), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).