Skip to content
Ice Lab

Mon, Jan 12, 2026·Xfinity Mobile Arena, Philadelphia

Tampa Bay Lightning 5, Philadelphia Flyers 1

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Tampa Bay Lightning win this game 75% of the time.

PHI winsTBL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
TBL1631416526
PHI0511006121

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 1:10TBLPontus HolmbergAssists: Zemgus Girgensons, Yanni Gourde · Snap, 0.20 xG1–0
  2. P2 0:33TBLJake GuentzelGWGAssists: Erik Cernak, Brandon Hagel · Deflected, 0.13 xG2–0
  3. P2 4:29TBLBrayden PointPPAssists: Oliver Bjorkstrand, Jake Guentzel · Backhand, 0.18 xG3–0
  4. P2 5:40PHIChristian DvorakUnassisted · Wrist, 0.05 xG3–1
  5. P2 19:29TBLBrandon HagelPPAssists: Darren Raddysh, Nikita Kucherov · Wrist, 0.05 xG4–1
  6. P3 16:39TBLNikita KucherovENAssists: Darren Raddysh, Anthony Cirelli · Wrist, 0.64 xG5–1
Penalties (21)
  1. P2 4:06PHIRodrigo Abols: Tripping2 min · PPG
  2. P2 4:29TBLOliver Bjorkstrand: Roughing2 min
  3. P2 4:29PHITravis Sanheim: Roughing2 min
  4. P2 7:39TBLErik Cernak: Holding2 min
  5. P2 13:01TBLBrandon Hagel: Interference2 min
  6. P2 16:18TBLCharle-Edouard D'Astous: Roughing2 min
  7. P2 16:18PHITravis Konecny: Roughing2 min
  8. P2 18:50PHINick Seeler: Interference2 min · PPG
  9. P2 19:59PHINikita Grebenkin: Cross checking2 min
  10. P2 19:59TBLYanni Gourde: Roughing2 min
  11. P3 3:46PHIRodrigo Abols: Boarding2 min
  12. P3 3:46TBLNick Paul: Fighting5 min
  13. P3 3:46PHIRodrigo Abols: Fighting5 min
  14. P3 3:46TBLMax Crozier: Fighting5 min
  15. P3 3:46PHINikita Grebenkin: Fighting5 min
  16. P3 3:46PHINikita Grebenkin: Game misconduct10 min
  17. P3 3:46TBLMax Crozier: Game misconduct10 min
  18. P3 8:40PHIGarnet Hathaway: Roughing2 min
  19. P3 10:36TBLJake Guentzel: Slashing2 min
  20. P3 10:36PHITravis Konecny: Cross checking2 min
  21. P3 10:36PHITravis Konecny: Abuse of officials10 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

TBL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0PHI
47% to win53% to win
← TBL attackPHI attack →
  1. P1 20:00Dvorak won the faceoff against Cirelli
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

TBLPHI
26Shots on goal21
4.2Expected goals2.6
55Shot attempts52
17Faceoffs won31
4Power plays2
32Penalty minutes46
10Hits32
11Blocked shots17
9Giveaways19
6Takeaways1

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Tampa Bay Lightning

Forward lines

  1. bestKucherov – Point – Goncalves4:51

    xG 0.61–0.00 (100%)attempts 5–2goals 0–0

  2. Guentzel – Cirelli – Hagel5:34

    xG 0.16–0.15 (52%)attempts 5–3goals 1–0

  3. Gourde – Girgensons – Holmberg12:42

    xG 0.45–0.63 (42%)attempts 12–14goals 1–0

  4. Bjorkstrand – Paul – James7:36

    xG 0.07–0.49 (12%)attempts 3–6goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestRaddysh – Moser11:34

    xG 0.53–0.46 (53%)attempts 11–9goals 1–0

  2. Crozier – Carlile7:58

    xG 0.29–0.26 (53%)attempts 3–6goals 0–0

  3. Cernak – Carlile4:04

    xG 0.00–0.01 (0%)attempts 3–4goals 0–0

Philadelphia Flyers

Forward lines

  1. bestCouturier – Tippett – Barkey6:08

    xG 0.33–0.01 (98%)attempts 5–4goals 0–0

  2. Hathaway – Abols – Grebenkin4:56

    xG 0.37–0.07 (85%)attempts 3–2goals 0–0

  3. Dvorak – Konecny – Zegras7:47

    xG 0.49–0.81 (38%)attempts 8–9goals 0–1

  4. Grundstrom – Cates – Michkov4:44

    xG 0.00–0.46 (0%)attempts 0–8goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestSeeler – Sanheim4:24

    xG 0.44–0.00 (100%)attempts 7–0goals 0–0

  2. Ristolainen – York3:53

    xG 0.42–0.13 (76%)attempts 8–2goals 0–0

  3. Juulsen – Andrae12:45

    xG 0.27–0.27 (49%)attempts 8–11goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

PHI 2.6 xGTBL 4.2 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

PHITBL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

PHI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line PHI is favoured, below it TBL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 25/100 · #1050 of 1312 this seasonSwing 0.75 · 5 goals in reachComeback index 47% (winner's lowest chance)
TBL 100%5050%50PHI 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +15 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Tampa Bay Lightning win this game 75% of the time.

PHI winsTBL wins

Simulated goal difference (PHI − TBL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).