Skip to content
Ice Lab

Mon, Jan 12, 2026·Ball Arena, Denver

Toronto Maple Leafs 4, Colorado Avalanche 3 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Toronto Maple Leafs win this game 60% of the time.

COL winsTOR wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
TOR115191513432
COL2130711202334

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 11:15TOREaston CowanUnassisted · Other, 1.00 xG1–0
  2. P1 16:12COLCale MakarAssists: Martin Necas, Nathan MacKinnon · Wrist, 0.05 xG1–1
  3. P1 17:53COLBrock NelsonPPAssists: Nathan MacKinnon, Cale Makar · Slap, 0.14 xG1–2
  4. P2 2:12TORBobby McMannUnassisted · Wrist, 0.07 xG2–2
  5. P3 10:24TORAuston MatthewsAssists: William Nylander, Oliver Ekman-Larsson · Wrist, 0.04 xG3–2
  6. P3 12:55COLMartin NecasAssists: Nathan MacKinnon · Tip-in, 0.08 xG3–3
  7. OT 3:59TORWilliam NylanderGWGAssists: Oliver Ekman-Larsson, Auston Matthews · Wrist, 0.14 xG4–3
Penalties (7)
  1. P1 13:29COLCale Makar: Tripping2 min
  2. P1 17:48TORMorgan Rielly: Interference2 min · PPG
  3. P2 9:18COLIvan Ivan: High sticking2 min
  4. P3 4:31TORBobby McMann: Tripping2 min
  5. P3 10:08TORScott Laughton: High sticking2 min
  6. P3 10:08COLMartin Necas: Holding2 min
  7. P3 17:18TORAuston Matthews: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

TOR00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0COL
47% to win53% to win
← TOR attackCOL attack →
  1. P1 20:00MacKinnon won the faceoff against Laughton
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

TORCOL
32Shots on goal34
3.5Expected goals3.0
54Shot attempts71
28Faceoffs won27
2Power plays3
8Penalty minutes6
13Hits14
22Blocked shots12
15Giveaways22
8Takeaways3

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Toronto Maple Leafs

Forward lines

  1. bestRoy – McMann – Cowan3:44

    xG 1.07–0.25 (81%)attempts 4–6goals 2–0

  2. Domi – Matthews – McMann2:32

    xG 0.08–0.08 (49%)attempts 3–1goals 0–1

  3. Laughton – Lorentz – McMann3:40

    xG 0.05–0.17 (23%)attempts 2–7goals 0–0

  4. Tavares – Nylander – Maccelli9:52

    xG 0.17–0.39 (30%)attempts 4–11goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestRielly – Carlo13:21

    xG 1.53–0.87 (64%)attempts 14–20goals 1–0

  2. Stecher – Benoit12:15

    xG 0.19–0.40 (33%)attempts 10–13goals 1–0

  3. Ekman-Larsson – McCabe13:40

    xG 0.22–0.52 (30%)attempts 10–18goals 0–1

Colorado Avalanche

Forward lines

  1. bestOlofsson – Kelly – Drury8:27

    xG 0.55–0.29 (66%)attempts 23–7goals 0–1

  2. Lehkonen – MacKinnon – Necas13:27

    xG 0.40–0.26 (60%)attempts 12–9goals 0–0

  3. Bardakov – Ivan – Brindley3:15

    xG 0.01–0.05 (15%)attempts 1–3goals 0–0

  4. Nelson – Nichushkin – Colton9:45

    xG 0.71–1.36 (34%)attempts 14–11goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestMakar – Malinski11:40

    xG 0.54–0.30 (64%)attempts 12–14goals 0–0

  2. Girard – Solovyov4:36

    xG 0.30–0.14 (68%)attempts 14–4goals 0–1

  3. Manson – Girard4:50

    xG 0.16–0.08 (66%)attempts 3–2goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

COL 3.0 xGTOR 3.5 xG
01234P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

COLTOR

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

COL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line COL is favoured, below it TOR. Dots are goals.

Excitement 84/100 · #246 of 1312 this seasonSwing 2.19 · 7 goals in reachComeback index 29% (winner's lowest chance)
TOR 100%5050%50COL 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +28 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Toronto Maple Leafs win this game 60% of the time.

COL winsTOR wins

Simulated goal difference (COL − TOR), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).