Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Jan 17, 2026·KeyBank Center, Buffalo

Minnesota Wild 5, Buffalo Sabres 4 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 73% of the time.

BUF winsMIN wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
MIN2721801011536
BUF16390900424

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 9:19MINMarcus FolignoAssists: Vladimir Tarasenko, Ben Jones · Snap, 0.24 xG1–0
  2. P1 10:05BUFRyan McLeodAssists: Jack Quinn, Jason Zucker · Deflected, 0.09 xG1–1
  3. P1 19:52MINRyan HartmanAssists: Quinn Hughes, Kirill Kaprizov · Tip-in, 0.11 xG2–1
  4. P2 1:08MINVladimir TarasenkoAssists: Jared Spurgeon, Danila Yurov · Wrist, 0.09 xG3–1
  5. P2 10:07BUFPeyton KrebsAssists: Mattias Samuelsson · Tip-in, 0.06 xG3–2
  6. P2 11:34BUFJack QuinnAssists: Rasmus Dahlin, Jason Zucker · Wrist, 0.15 xG3–3
  7. P2 16:07BUFAlex TuchPPAssists: Tage Thompson, Ryan McLeod · Wrist, 0.05 xG3–4
  8. P2 17:04MINQuinn HughesAssists: Kirill Kaprizov, Mats Zuccarello · Slap, 0.10 xG4–4
  9. OT 1:46MINMats ZuccarelloPPGWGAssists: Kirill Kaprizov, Filip Gustavsson · Snap, 0.13 xG5–4
Penalties (12)
  1. P1 3:10BUFTage Thompson: Hooking2 min
  2. P1 10:05BUFMichael Kesselring: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  3. P1 10:05MINMarcus Foligno: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  4. P1 12:11MINMarcus Foligno: Fighting5 min
  5. P1 12:11BUFMichael Kesselring: Fighting5 min
  6. P1 15:25MINQuinn Hughes: Hooking2 min
  7. P1 16:26MINDanila Yurov: Hooking2 min
  8. P2 1:47BUFBowen Byram: Slashing2 min
  9. P2 4:08BUFMichael Kesselring: Hooking2 min
  10. P2 12:19MINDavid Jiricek: Roughing2 min
  11. P2 15:01MINDanila Yurov: Holding2 min · PPG
  12. P3 19:46BUFPeyton Krebs: Hooking2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

MIN00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0BUF
47% to win53% to win
← MIN attackBUF attack →
  1. P1 20:00Hartman won the faceoff against Thompson
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

MINBUF
36Shots on goal24
4.4Expected goals2.9
69Shot attempts48
32Faceoffs won26
4Power plays4
15Penalty minutes15
31Hits21
9Blocked shots16
11Giveaways10
6Takeaways3

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestZuccarello – Hartman – Kaprizov14:26

    xG 1.35–0.19 (88%)attempts 27–6goals 2–1

  2. Tarasenko – Trenin – Yurov9:54

    xG 0.28–0.29 (50%)attempts 5–8goals 1–0

  3. Foligno – Hinostroza – Haight5:57

    xG 0.53–0.59 (47%)attempts 13–6goals 0–0

  4. Pitlick – Jones – Sturm5:25

    xG 0.32–0.55 (37%)attempts 4–8goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestHughes – Faber19:09

    xG 1.48–0.82 (64%)attempts 25–14goals 3–2

  2. Spurgeon – Middleton11:50

    xG 0.67–0.36 (65%)attempts 13–11goals 1–1

  3. Hunt – Jiricek7:07

    xG 0.51–0.24 (68%)attempts 8–6goals 0–0

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. bestZucker – McLeod – Quinn10:20

    xG 1.06–0.88 (54%)attempts 12–12goals 2–0

  2. Krebs – Doan – Ostlund7:51

    xG 0.38–0.34 (53%)attempts 8–10goals 1–1

  3. Tuch – Thompson – Benson13:01

    xG 0.28–0.47 (37%)attempts 8–13goals 0–0

  4. Greenway – Malenstyn – Kozak5:56

    xG 0.06–1.06 (6%)attempts 2–12goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestDahlin – Metsa3:24

    xG 0.51–0.11 (82%)attempts 5–2goals 1–0

  2. Dahlin – Byram4:06

    xG 0.46–0.21 (69%)attempts 6–3goals 0–0

  3. Kesselring – Byram2:16

    xG 0.17–0.01 (96%)attempts 3–2goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

BUF 2.9 xGMIN 4.4 xG
012345P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

BUFMIN

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

BUF's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line BUF is favoured, below it MIN. Dots are goals.

Excitement 96/100 · #71 of 1312 this seasonSwing 2.39 · 9 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 23% (winner's lowest chance)
MIN 100%5050%50BUF 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +29 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 73% of the time.

BUF winsMIN wins

Simulated goal difference (BUF − MIN), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).