Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Feb 5, 2026·KeyBank Center, Buffalo

Pittsburgh Penguins 5, Buffalo Sabres 2

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 83% of the time.

BUF winsPIT wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
PIT21017215532
BUF1809110227

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 1:46BUFJason ZuckerAssists: Ryan McLeod, Bowen Byram · Wrist, 0.03 xG0–1
  2. P1 9:18PITAvery HayesAssists: Ilya Solovyov, Rutger McGroarty · Snap, 0.10 xG1–1
  3. P1 18:47PITAvery HayesAssists: Anthony Mantha, Parker Wotherspoon · Snap, 0.17 xG2–1
  4. P2 7:44PITBen KindelGWGUnassisted · Wrist, 0.08 xG3–1
  5. P3 1:55BUFTage ThompsonPPAssists: Jack Quinn, Rasmus Dahlin · Wrist, 0.07 xG3–2
  6. P3 15:33PITTommy NovakAssists: Egor Chinakhov, Evgeni Malkin · Backhand, 0.17 xG4–2
  7. P3 19:46PITBen KindelENAssists: Connor Dewar · Snap, 0.81 xG5–2
Penalties (10)
  1. P1 15:54PITEvgeni Malkin: High sticking2 min
  2. P1 18:59PITRyan Shea: Holding2 min
  3. P2 10:03PITSidney Crosby: Cross checking2 min
  4. P2 17:54BUFAlex Tuch: Tripping2 min
  5. P3 1:14PITEvgeni Malkin: Tripping2 min · PPG
  6. P3 4:13BUFMichael Kesselring: Hooking2 min
  7. P3 10:33BUFPeyton Krebs: Interference goalkeeper2 min
  8. P3 10:33PITConnor Clifton: Fighting5 min
  9. P3 10:33BUFPeyton Krebs: Fighting5 min
  10. P3 18:31PITAnthony Mantha: Hooking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PIT00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0BUF
47% to win53% to win
← PIT attackBUF attack →
  1. P1 20:00Crosby won the faceoff against Thompson
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PITBUF
32Shots on goal27
5.0Expected goals2.8
54Shot attempts60
30Faceoffs won36
3Power plays5
15Penalty minutes11
20Hits16
8Blocked shots10
17Giveaways15
6Takeaways4

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestHayes – Hayes – McGroarty6:01

    xG 0.46–0.00 (100%)attempts 7–2goals 1–0

  2. Malkin – Novak – Chinakhov10:45

    xG 0.96–0.52 (65%)attempts 13–10goals 1–1

  3. Brazeau – Dewar – Kindel6:58

    xG 0.29–0.34 (46%)attempts 5–6goals 1–0

  4. Crosby – Rust – Mantha9:38

    xG 0.17–0.36 (33%)attempts 6–9goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestClifton – Solovyov8:38

    xG 0.76–0.32 (71%)attempts 9–8goals 1–0

  2. Karlsson – Wotherspoon12:36

    xG 0.50–0.30 (62%)attempts 8–9goals 1–0

  3. Kulak – Shea12:33

    xG 0.71–0.82 (47%)attempts 11–13goals 1–1

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. bestTuch – Thompson – Doan6:28

    xG 0.45–0.25 (64%)attempts 7–4goals 0–1

  2. Tuch – Thompson – Krebs4:57

    xG 0.15–0.10 (61%)attempts 5–3goals 0–0

  3. Malenstyn – Krebs – Kozak3:11

    xG 0.14–0.14 (50%)attempts 3–3goals 0–0

  4. Rosen – Ostlund – Helenius3:53

    xG 0.13–0.18 (41%)attempts 4–3goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. Bryson – Kesselring4:13

    xG 0.15–0.30 (33%)attempts 4–4goals 1–2

  2. Samuelsson – Dahlin14:22

    xG 0.51–0.90 (36%)attempts 12–14goals 0–0

  3. Byram – Power17:27

    xG 0.50–0.91 (35%)attempts 13–16goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

BUF 2.8 xGPIT 5.0 xG
012345P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

BUFPIT

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

BUF's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line BUF is favoured, below it PIT. Dots are goals.

Excitement 55/100 · #640 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.34 · 7 goals in reachComeback index 33% (winner's lowest chance)
PIT 100%5050%50BUF 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +16 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 83% of the time.

BUF winsPIT wins

Simulated goal difference (BUF − PIT), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).