Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Feb 28, 2026·Benchmark International Arena, Tampa

Buffalo Sabres 6, Tampa Bay Lightning 2

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Buffalo Sabres win this game 63% of the time.

TBL winsBUF wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
BUF41012015635
TBL014112112238

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 5:25BUFRasmus DahlinAssists: Owen Power · Wrist, 0.07 xG1–0
  2. P1 6:15BUFJosh NorrisAssists: Josh Doan, Zach Metsa · Wrist, 0.09 xG2–0
  3. P1 8:18BUFJosh NorrisGWGAssists: Bowen Byram, Zach Benson · Tip-in, 0.09 xG3–0
  4. P1 15:06BUFTage ThompsonAssists: Peyton Krebs, Rasmus Dahlin · Wrist, 0.18 xG4–0
  5. P2 1:54BUFZach MetsaUnassisted · Wrist, 0.10 xG5–0
  6. P2 16:03TBLDominic JamesAssists: Oliver Bjorkstrand, Victor Hedman · Wrist, 0.17 xG5–1
  7. P3 3:43BUFAlex TuchPPAssists: Rasmus Dahlin, Jack Quinn · Wrist, 0.06 xG6–1
  8. P3 5:27TBLVictor HedmanAssists: Darren Raddysh · Slap, 0.04 xG6–2
Penalties (16)
  1. P1 10:44BUFZach Benson: Cross checking2 min
  2. P2 5:47TBLBrayden Point: Slashing2 min
  3. P2 5:47BUFRasmus Dahlin: Cross checking2 min
  4. P2 10:26TBLEmil Lilleberg: Roughing2 min
  5. P2 12:10TBLJake Guentzel: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  6. P2 16:03TBLVictor Hedman: Roughing2 min
  7. P2 16:03BUFMattias Samuelsson: Roughing2 min
  8. P3 1:28BUFAlex Tuch: Roughing2 min
  9. P3 1:28TBLCharle-Edouard D'Astous: Roughing2 min
  10. P3 1:28BUFMichael Kesselring: Cross checking2 min
  11. P3 2:02TBLJake Guentzel: Abuse of officials2 min · PPG
  12. P3 2:02TBLJake Guentzel: Abusive language10 min
  13. P3 6:23TBLDarren Raddysh: Cross checking2 min
  14. P3 12:48TBLAnthony Cirelli: Interference2 min
  15. P3 17:12BUFMichael Kesselring: Cross checking2 min
  16. P3 0:00TBLCharle-Edouard D'Astous: Roughing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

BUF00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0TBL
47% to win53% to win
← BUF attackTBL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Norris won the faceoff against Point
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

BUFTBL
35Shots on goal38
4.1Expected goals3.2
55Shot attempts65
31Faceoffs won33
5Power plays3
12Penalty minutes28
16Hits28
14Blocked shots5
16Giveaways11
2Takeaways6

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. bestTuch – Thompson – Krebs7:42

    xG 0.80–0.59 (58%)attempts 10–11goals 1–2

  2. Zucker – McLeod – Quinn7:39

    xG 0.54–0.36 (60%)attempts 12–9goals 1–0

  3. Norris – Doan – Ostlund7:29

    xG 0.15–0.35 (29%)attempts 3–9goals 1–0

  4. Malenstyn – Kozak – Benson8:48

    xG 0.16–0.62 (21%)attempts 4–12goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestSamuelsson – Dahlin9:41

    xG 0.58–0.36 (62%)attempts 11–12goals 1–0

  2. Byram – Power6:19

    xG 0.48–0.37 (56%)attempts 9–5goals 1–0

  3. Power – Metsa2:19

    xG 0.42–0.37 (54%)attempts 4–6goals 1–0

Tampa Bay Lightning

Forward lines

  1. bestBjorkstrand – Hagel – James4:02

    xG 0.37–0.00 (100%)attempts 8–0goals 0–0

  2. Kucherov – Point – Goncalves4:55

    xG 0.24–0.14 (64%)attempts 3–3goals 0–1

  3. Kucherov – Point – Hagel3:01

    xG 0.08–0.08 (50%)attempts 6–3goals 1–0

  4. Guentzel – Cirelli – Hagel4:40

    xG 0.29–0.46 (39%)attempts 6–8goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestHedman – D'Astous4:20

    xG 0.63–0.24 (73%)attempts 10–5goals 0–1

  2. D'Astous – Lilleberg7:21

    xG 0.38–0.01 (97%)attempts 10–2goals 0–0

  3. Hedman – Raddysh2:32

    xG 0.31–0.19 (62%)attempts 7–5goals 2–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

TBL 3.2 xGBUF 4.1 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

TBLBUF

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

TBL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line TBL is favoured, below it BUF. Dots are goals.

Excitement 22/100 · #1082 of 1312 this seasonSwing 0.58 · 5 goals in reachComeback index 47% (winner's lowest chance)
BUF 100%5050%50TBL 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +15 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Buffalo Sabres win this game 63% of the time.

TBL winsBUF wins

Simulated goal difference (TBL − BUF), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).