Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Mar 5, 2026·PPG Paints Arena, Pittsburgh

Buffalo Sabres 5, Pittsburgh Penguins 1

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Buffalo Sabres win this game 68% of the time.

PIT winsBUF wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
BUF1731118526
PIT16012010128

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 12:00BUFRyan McLeodSHUnassisted · Backhand, 0.13 xG1–0
  2. P1 14:48PITBryan RustSHAssists: Ben Kindel · Wrist, 0.24 xG1–1
  3. P2 4:10BUFJosh NorrisPPGWGAssists: Josh Doan, Bowen Byram · Wrist, 0.21 xG2–1
  4. P2 6:18BUFAlex TuchSHAssists: Owen Power, Tage Thompson · Tip-in, 0.08 xG3–1
  5. P2 10:30BUFOwen PowerAssists: Josh Norris, Noah Ostlund · Wrist, 0.08 xG4–1
  6. P3 16:53BUFMattias SamuelssonENUnassisted · Wrist, 0.34 xG5–1
Penalties (13)
  1. P1 3:22BUFPeyton Krebs: Hooking2 min
  2. P1 8:16PITErik Karlsson: Holding2 min
  3. P1 10:24BUFJack Quinn: Too many men on the ice2 min
  4. P1 14:04PITNoel Acciari: Holding2 min
  5. P2 0:38BUFRasmus Dahlin: Cross checking2 min
  6. P2 0:38PITEvgeni Malkin: Cross checking2 min
  7. P2 0:38PITEvgeni Malkin: Slashing5 min · PPG
  8. P2 0:38PITEvgeni Malkin: Game misconduct10 min
  9. P2 4:10PITEgor Chinakhov: Delaying game unsuccessful challenge2 min
  10. P2 5:25BUFRyan McLeod: Slashing2 min
  11. P2 14:44BUFBeck Malenstyn: Boarding2 min
  12. P3 7:04PITBen Kindel: Holding the stick2 min
  13. P3 11:54BUFRasmus Dahlin: Slashing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

BUF00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0PIT
47% to win53% to win
← BUF attackPIT attack →
  1. P1 20:00Norris won the faceoff against Novak
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

BUFPIT
26Shots on goal28
3.6Expected goals2.6
61Shot attempts56
28Faceoffs won19
6Power plays5
12Penalty minutes25
20Hits18
11Blocked shots11
13Giveaways17
3Takeaways2

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. bestNorris – Doan – Ostlund8:28

    xG 0.52–0.14 (79%)attempts 11–2goals 1–0

  2. Zucker – McLeod – Quinn5:29

    xG 0.50–0.26 (66%)attempts 7–5goals 0–0

  3. Malenstyn – Dunne – Benson5:54

    xG 0.25–0.06 (81%)attempts 6–5goals 0–0

  4. Tuch – Thompson – Krebs5:34

    xG 0.11–0.49 (18%)attempts 4–9goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestSamuelsson – Metsa3:34

    xG 0.12–0.04 (75%)attempts 3–3goals 0–0

  2. Dahlin – Power3:59

    xG 0.29–0.22 (57%)attempts 4–7goals 1–0

  3. Byram – Power4:51

    xG 0.19–0.15 (56%)attempts 6–2goals 0–0

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestMalkin – Novak – Chinakhov3:12

    xG 0.34–0.13 (72%)attempts 4–3goals 0–0

  2. Mantha – Novak – Brazeau2:39

    xG 0.25–0.07 (79%)attempts 2–1goals 0–0

  3. Rust – Rakell – Chinakhov2:36

    xG 0.22–0.13 (62%)attempts 5–2goals 0–0

  4. Acciari – Dewar – Lizotte7:13

    xG 0.35–0.43 (45%)attempts 7–13goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestClifton – Shea10:20

    xG 0.82–0.23 (78%)attempts 10–9goals 0–0

  2. Letang – Girard9:54

    xG 0.48–0.12 (80%)attempts 12–5goals 0–0

  3. Karlsson – Girard2:03

    xG 0.00–0.07 (0%)attempts 0–1goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

PIT 2.6 xGBUF 3.6 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

PITBUF

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

PIT's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line PIT is favoured, below it BUF. Dots are goals.

Excitement 32/100 · #936 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.08 · 5 goals in reachComeback index 45% (winner's lowest chance)
BUF 100%5050%50PIT 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +17 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Buffalo Sabres win this game 68% of the time.

PIT winsBUF wins

Simulated goal difference (PIT − BUF), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).