Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Mar 7, 2026·PPG Paints Arena, Pittsburgh

Philadelphia Flyers 4, Pittsburgh Penguins 3 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 69% of the time.

PIT winsPHI wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
PHI122805011416
PIT182704040323

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 3:00PITTommy NovakPPAssists: Justin Brazeau, Ville Koivunen · Wrist, 0.08 xG0–1
  2. P1 3:54PHIOwen TippettAssists: Trevor Zegras, Cam York · Wrist, 0.12 xG1–1
  3. P2 3:38PITRickard RakellAssists: Egor Chinakhov, Bryan Rust · Wrist, 0.05 xG1–2
  4. P2 4:46PHIAlex BumpAssists: Nikita Grebenkin · Wrist, 0.09 xG2–2
  5. P2 5:45PITErik KarlssonAssists: Egor Chinakhov, Rickard Rakell · Slap, 0.02 xG2–3
  6. P2 10:03PHIDenver BarkeyAssists: Matvei Michkov, Noah Cates · Backhand, 0.11 xG3–3

Shootout

  1. 1. PIT Anthony Mantha stopped
  2. 2. PHI Matvei Michkov stopped
  3. 3. PIT Rickard Rakell stopped
  4. 4. PHI Trevor Zegras scored
  5. 5. PIT Egor Chinakhov stopped
Penalties (10)
  1. P1 1:31PHIRasmus Ristolainen: Holding2 min · PPG
  2. P1 9:12PHILuke Glendening: High sticking2 min
  3. P1 13:44PITJustin Brazeau: Tripping2 min
  4. P1 18:40PHIJamie Drysdale: Roughing2 min
  5. P1 18:40PHIJamie Drysdale: Fighting5 min
  6. P1 18:40PITAvery Hayes: Fighting5 min
  7. P2 13:02PITKris Letang: Slashing2 min
  8. P3 3:54PHIChristian Dvorak: Slashing2 min
  9. P3 13:19PHICarl Grundstrom: High sticking2 min
  10. OT 2:51PHIDan Vladar: Interference2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PHI00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0PIT
47% to win53% to win
← PHI attackPIT attack →
  1. P1 20:00Glendening won the faceoff against Lizotte
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PHIPIT
16Shots on goal23
2.0Expected goals3.0
40Shot attempts64
38Faceoffs won31
2Power plays6
17Penalty minutes9
26Hits19
15Blocked shots5
12Giveaways14
4Takeaways6

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Philadelphia Flyers

Forward lines

  1. bestDvorak – Bump – Grebenkin7:38

    xG 0.40–0.34 (54%)attempts 12–4goals 1–0

  2. Grundstrom – Tippett – Zegras7:54

    xG 0.16–0.29 (36%)attempts 4–12goals 1–1

  3. Cates – Barkey – Michkov11:12

    xG 0.39–0.54 (42%)attempts 8–9goals 1–0

  4. Couturier – Glendening – Hathaway6:24

    xG 0.07–0.27 (21%)attempts 1–9goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestJuulsen – Andrae3:48

    xG 0.34–0.09 (79%)attempts 6–3goals 0–0

  2. Juulsen – York2:09

    xG 0.09–0.04 (70%)attempts 1–2goals 1–1

  3. Ristolainen – Sanheim15:56

    xG 0.13–0.48 (21%)attempts 7–15goals 0–1

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestRust – Rakell – Chinakhov11:14

    xG 0.64–0.01 (99%)attempts 14–2goals 2–0

  2. Acciari – Dewar – Lizotte9:55

    xG 0.50–0.20 (71%)attempts 16–5goals 0–0

  3. Mantha – Brazeau – Kindel3:03

    xG 0.12–0.02 (84%)attempts 3–2goals 0–0

  4. Mantha – Novak – Brazeau6:25

    xG 0.16–0.12 (56%)attempts 4–4goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestClifton – Shea11:07

    xG 0.54–0.30 (64%)attempts 12–8goals 0–1

  2. Karlsson – Wotherspoon13:21

    xG 0.37–0.20 (64%)attempts 12–7goals 1–0

  3. Letang – Girard14:59

    xG 0.70–0.68 (51%)attempts 16–12goals 1–2

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

PIT 3.0 xGPHI 2.0 xG
0123P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

PITPHI

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

PIT's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line PIT is favoured, below it PHI. Dots are goals.

Excitement 83/100 · #266 of 1312 this seasonSwing 2.21 · 6 goals in reachComeback index 26% (winner's lowest chance)
PHI 100%5050%50PIT 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +25 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 69% of the time.

PIT winsPHI wins

Simulated goal difference (PIT − PHI), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).