Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Mar 10, 2026·Lenovo Center, Raleigh

Pittsburgh Penguins 4, Carolina Hurricanes 5 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Carolina Hurricanes win this game 69% of the time.

CAR winsPIT wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
PIT1911028011428
CAR113012316032544

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 7:46CARLogan StankovenAssists: Mike Reilly, Jackson Blake · Snap, 0.18 xG0–1
  2. P1 19:04PITAnthony ManthaAssists: Ville Koivunen · Snap, 0.09 xG1–1
  3. P2 11:44PITBryan RustPPAssists: Egor Chinakhov, Erik Karlsson · Snap, 0.13 xG2–1
  4. P3 2:49CARMark JankowskiAssists: William Carrier, Alexander Nikishin · Backhand, 0.10 xG2–2
  5. P3 3:48CARSeth JarvisAssists: Andrei Svechnikov · Snap, 0.21 xG2–3
  6. P3 11:21CARAlexander NikishinPPAssists: Sebastian Aho, Nikolaj Ehlers · Snap, 0.17 xG2–4
  7. P3 17:52PITNoel AcciariAssists: Bryan Rust, Egor Chinakhov · Wrist, 0.24 xG3–4
  8. P3 19:24PITBryan RustAssists: Rickard Rakell, Erik Karlsson · Snap, 0.09 xG4–4

Shootout

  1. 1. CAR Seth Jarvis stopped
  2. 2. PIT Ben Kindel scored
  3. 3. CAR Andrei Svechnikov scored
  4. 4. PIT Egor Chinakhov stopped
  5. 5. CAR Jackson Blake scored
  6. 6. PIT Anthony Mantha stopped
Penalties (12)
  1. P1 1:16PITConnor Clifton: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  2. P1 13:53CARJackson Blake: Tripping2 min
  3. P2 3:29CARAndrei Svechnikov: High sticking2 min
  4. P2 7:33CARAndrei Svechnikov: High sticking2 min
  5. P2 10:23CARWilliam Carrier: Closing hand on puck2 min · PPG
  6. P2 11:57PITNoel Acciari: Roughing2 min
  7. P2 11:57CARAlexander Nikishin: Roughing2 min
  8. P2 13:17PITParker Wotherspoon: Holding2 min
  9. P3 9:21PITRyan Shea: Cross checking2 min · PPG
  10. P3 10:53PITParker Wotherspoon: Tripping2 min
  11. P3 11:42PITKris Letang: Tripping2 min
  12. OT 2:31CARJaccob Slavin: Slashing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PIT00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CAR
47% to win53% to win
← PIT attackCAR attack →
  1. P1 20:00Staal won the faceoff against Rakell
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PITCAR
28Shots on goal44
4.4Expected goals5.9
66Shot attempts86
36Faceoffs won31
5Power plays5
12Penalty minutes12
16Hits28
20Blocked shots14
20Giveaways16
3Takeaways7

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestSoderblom – Hayes – Kindel7:37

    xG 0.82–0.74 (53%)attempts 11–9goals 0–0

  2. Rust – Rakell – Chinakhov9:01

    xG 0.26–0.34 (44%)attempts 6–11goals 0–0

  3. Mantha – Novak – Koivunen6:44

    xG 0.34–0.67 (34%)attempts 7–6goals 1–1

  4. Acciari – Dewar – Lizotte8:34

    xG 0.34–0.92 (27%)attempts 8–17goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestKarlsson – Wotherspoon11:18

    xG 1.01–0.25 (80%)attempts 19–9goals 0–0

  2. Clifton – Solovyov8:40

    xG 0.55–1.22 (31%)attempts 7–15goals 0–1

  3. Letang – Shea10:48

    xG 0.12–1.21 (9%)attempts 4–18goals 1–2

Carolina Hurricanes

Forward lines

  1. bestAho – Svechnikov – Jarvis8:02

    xG 0.92–0.42 (68%)attempts 12–6goals 1–1

  2. Hall – Stankoven – Blake10:30

    xG 1.06–0.70 (60%)attempts 17–11goals 1–0

  3. Jankowski – Carrier – Robinson7:15

    xG 0.62–0.46 (57%)attempts 10–10goals 1–0

  4. Staal – Martinook – Ehlers8:45

    xG 0.35–0.35 (50%)attempts 11–7goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestSlavin – Chatfield13:18

    xG 1.02–0.31 (77%)attempts 18–9goals 0–0

  2. Reilly – Nikishin11:29

    xG 0.93–0.75 (56%)attempts 17–12goals 2–0

  3. Walker – Miller13:24

    xG 1.05–1.14 (48%)attempts 16–17goals 1–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CAR 5.9 xGPIT 4.4 xG
0123456P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CARPIT

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CAR's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CAR is favoured, below it PIT. Dots are goals.

Excitement 97/100 · #46 of 1312 this seasonSwing 2.81 · 8 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 26% (winner's lowest chance)
PIT 100%5050%50CAR 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +50 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Carolina Hurricanes win this game 69% of the time.

CAR winsPIT wins

Simulated goal difference (CAR − PIT), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).