Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Mar 14, 2026·Benchmark International Arena, Tampa

Carolina Hurricanes 4, Tampa Bay Lightning 2

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Carolina Hurricanes win this game 76% of the time.

TBL winsCAR wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
CAR213011211435
TBL0102702219

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 0:36CARAndrei SvechnikovAssists: Sebastian Aho, Sean Walker · Snap, 0.20 xG1–0
  2. P1 17:28CARSebastian AhoAssists: Andrei Svechnikov, K'Andre Miller · Wrist, 0.13 xG2–0
  3. P2 14:10TBLYanni GourdeAssists: Victor Hedman, Pontus Holmberg · Snap, 0.06 xG2–1
  4. P2 15:31TBLCharle-Edouard D'AstousAssists: Brayden Point, Gage Goncalves · Tip-in, 0.10 xG2–2
  5. P3 9:18CARJordan MartinookGWGAssists: Nikolaj Ehlers, Mike Reilly · Wrist, 0.02 xG3–2
  6. P3 18:29CARLogan StankovenENAssists: Taylor Hall · Snap, 0.44 xG4–2
Penalties (9)
  1. P1 6:27CARAndrei Svechnikov: Slashing2 min
  2. P1 10:40TBLYanni Gourde: Hooking2 min
  3. P1 14:29CARSeth Jarvis: Roughing2 min
  4. P1 14:29CARSeth Jarvis: Fighting5 min
  5. P1 14:29TBLZemgus Girgensons: Fighting5 min
  6. P2 4:32TBLPontus Holmberg: Roughing2 min
  7. P2 4:32CARSebastian Aho: Roughing2 min
  8. P2 9:05CARSean Walker: Hooking2 min
  9. P2 9:20TBLBrandon Hagel: Hooking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

CAR00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0TBL
47% to win53% to win
← CAR attackTBL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Aho won the faceoff against Cirelli
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

CARTBL
35Shots on goal19
4.0Expected goals2.3
67Shot attempts38
22Faceoffs won19
2Power plays3
13Penalty minutes11
27Hits26
10Blocked shots14
13Giveaways14
9Takeaways4

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Carolina Hurricanes

Forward lines

  1. bestStaal – Martinook – Ehlers8:58

    xG 0.50–0.01 (97%)attempts 18–1goals 1–0

  2. Hall – Stankoven – Blake10:10

    xG 1.00–0.66 (60%)attempts 12–9goals 0–0

  3. Jankowski – Carrier – Robinson6:59

    xG 0.39–0.19 (67%)attempts 6–6goals 0–1

  4. Aho – Svechnikov – Blake2:04

    xG 0.01–0.17 (5%)attempts 1–2goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestSlavin – Chatfield16:37

    xG 0.89–0.39 (70%)attempts 19–7goals 0–0

  2. Reilly – Nikishin10:43

    xG 0.72–0.40 (64%)attempts 10–9goals 1–0

  3. Walker – Miller16:05

    xG 1.06–0.78 (58%)attempts 20–12goals 2–1

Tampa Bay Lightning

Forward lines

  1. bestGourde – Girgensons – Holmberg5:14

    xG 0.38–0.16 (70%)attempts 5–7goals 0–0

  2. Kucherov – Point – Goncalves3:50

    xG 0.31–0.11 (75%)attempts 3–3goals 0–0

  3. Kucherov – Cirelli – Hagel4:22

    xG 0.27–0.11 (71%)attempts 5–4goals 0–0

  4. Gourde – Holmberg – Goncalves2:31

    xG 0.00–0.04 (0%)attempts 0–1goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestRaddysh – Moser11:45

    xG 0.54–0.29 (65%)attempts 9–7goals 0–0

  2. McDonagh – Cernak4:20

    xG 0.23–0.29 (44%)attempts 4–7goals 0–1

  3. McDonagh – D'Astous9:35

    xG 0.40–0.46 (46%)attempts 8–12goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

TBL 2.3 xGCAR 4.0 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

TBLCAR

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

TBL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line TBL is favoured, below it CAR. Dots are goals.

Excitement 64/100 · #526 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.39 · 6 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 47% (winner's lowest chance)
CAR 100%5050%50TBL 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +25 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Carolina Hurricanes win this game 76% of the time.

TBL winsCAR wins

Simulated goal difference (TBL − CAR), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).