Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Oct 6, 2026·Scotiabank Arena, Toronto

Nashville Predators 4, Toronto Maple Leafs 5 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Toronto Maple Leafs win this game 69% of the time.

TOR winsNSH wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
NSH211270601425
TOR0831311214537

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 7:13NSHSteven StamkosPPAssists: Matthew Wood, Roman Josi · Wrist, 0.24 xG1–0
  2. P1 9:08NSHNils HoglanderAssists: Adam Wilsby, Filip Forsberg · Backhand, 0.16 xG2–0
  3. P2 3:03NSHNils HoglanderAssists: Filip Forsberg, Mavrik Bourque · Backhand, 0.16 xG3–0
  4. P2 4:56TORJohn TavaresAssists: Gavin McKenna, Anthony Stolarz · Wrist, 0.05 xG3–1
  5. P2 6:58TORWilliam NylanderPPAssists: Auston Matthews, Kirill Marchenko · Wrist, 0.13 xG3–2
  6. P2 13:30NSHSteven StamkosAssists: Ryan O'Reilly, Brady Skjei · Wrist, 0.05 xG4–2
  7. P2 14:31TORGavin McKennaAssists: Auston Matthews, Jack Roslovic · Wrist, 0.09 xG4–3
  8. P3 8:54TORJack RoslovicAssists: Auston Matthews, William Nylander · Wrist, 0.17 xG4–4
  9. OT 4:46TORAuston MatthewsGWGAssists: William Nylander · Wrist, 0.08 xG4–5
Penalties (4)
  1. P1 5:31TORMorgan Rielly: Tripping2 min · PPG
  2. P1 19:47NSHJonathan Marchessault: Tripping2 min
  3. P2 5:31NSHJack Drury: Hooking2 min · PPG
  4. P2 15:06NSHRoss Colton: Cross checking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

NSH00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0TOR
47% to win53% to win
← NSH attackTOR attack →
  1. P1 20:00O'Reilly won the faceoff against Matthews
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

NSHTOR
25Shots on goal37
2.9Expected goals4.2
52Shot attempts72
19Faceoffs won34
1Power plays3
6Penalty minutes2
22Hits20
17Blocked shots11
20Giveaways14
5Takeaways5

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Nashville Predators

Forward lines

  1. bestKerfoot – Drury – Edstrom5:48

    xG 0.31–0.11 (74%)attempts 4–5goals 0–0

  2. Stamkos – O'Reilly – Kerfoot5:57

    xG 0.18–0.09 (66%)attempts 4–3goals 0–0

  3. Colton – Drury – Edstrom3:47

    xG 0.10–0.11 (48%)attempts 2–5goals 0–0

  4. Stamkos – O'Reilly – Forsberg2:27

    xG 0.01–0.06 (19%)attempts 1–5goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestSkjei – Perbix15:25

    xG 0.73–0.59 (55%)attempts 14–14goals 1–2

  2. Wilsby – Trudeau8:48

    xG 0.55–0.50 (52%)attempts 7–11goals 1–1

  3. Hague – Ahcan3:11

    xG 0.01–0.00 (100%)attempts 1–1goals 0–0

Toronto Maple Leafs

Forward lines

  1. bestNylander – Roslovic – Matthews3:15

    xG 0.29–0.01 (95%)attempts 4–1goals 1–0

  2. Sissons – Paul – Cowan4:38

    xG 0.28–0.11 (71%)attempts 6–2goals 0–0

  3. Sissons – Paul – McKenna4:23

    xG 0.23–0.09 (73%)attempts 3–3goals 0–0

  4. Blueger – Duhaime – Groulx5:45

    xG 0.16–0.08 (66%)attempts 7–3goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestRielly – Raddysh16:02

    xG 0.82–0.53 (61%)attempts 21–13goals 0–1

  2. Ekman-Larsson – Stecher14:59

    xG 0.69–0.75 (48%)attempts 12–12goals 1–1

  3. Tanev – McCabe16:14

    xG 0.51–0.71 (42%)attempts 14–9goals 1–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

TOR 4.2 xGNSH 2.9 xG
01234P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

TORNSH

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

TOR's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line TOR is favoured, below it NSH. Dots are goals.

Excitement 95/100 · #3 of 52 this seasonSwing 2.03 · 9 goals in reach · 3-goal lead cutComeback index 8% (winner's lowest chance)
NSH 100%5050%50TOR 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +25 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Toronto Maple Leafs win this game 69% of the time.

TOR winsNSH wins

Simulated goal difference (TOR − NSH), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).