Skip to content
Ice Lab

Centre · #20

Brian Sutherby

Age
44
Shoots
Left
Height
188 cm
Weight
94 kg
Born
Edmonton, CAN
Draft
2000, round 1, #26 (WSH)

Career · 2009–10 to 2010–11

Games
97
Goals
7
Points
13
TOI per game
7:59
xGF% (5v5)
35.7%
Goals above expected
+1.0

Season by season

The regular-season line for each season, with the total, by team for traded players.

2009–10DAL46549+88:374910.2%03.5–
2010–11DAL51224−107:25326.3%02.535.7%
Total1 team977613−27:59818.6%06.035.7%

Form

Rolling averages smooth out single games so the trend shows.

Form, ten-game rolling

Points and individual expected goals per game (left scale), averaged over the previous ten games. Ice time is on the second chart.

Points per gameixG per gameTOI per game (minutes)
00.10.20.30.420406080
6m7m8m9m10m20406080Game

Player card

How 2009–10 to 2010–11 compares with everyone else at the position over the same seasons, and the players with the most similar profile.

Overall rating

Extra / AHL

2nd percentile among qualified forwards, blending scoring 40%, play-driving 40%, usage 20%.

  1. 1st line
  2. 2nd line
  3. 3rd line
  4. 4th line
  5. Extra / AHL

Scoring

4th line
  • Goals /600.5425th pct
  • Assists /600.478th pct
  • ixG /600.468th pct
  • Goals above expected+1.060th pct

Play-driving

Extra / AHL
  • xGF% (5v5)35.7%2nd pct
  • CF% (5v5)41.7%4th pct
  • Relative xGF%−12.91st pct
  • Penalty diff /60-0.547th pct

Usage

Extra / AHL
  • TOI per game7:593rd pct
  • PP time share1.7%13th pct
  • Offensive zone starts53.4%36th pct
  • Quality of competition23.0%7th pct

Percentiles among forwards with 200+ minutes at 5-on-5 and 20+ games. Ratings rank each column's average percentile among the same players and read it as a role on a depth chart (how).

Faceoffs

How often Sutherby wins the draw over 2009–10 to 2010–11, against whom and where, and what a win leads to. Ranked among players with 405+ draws over the same seasons.

Win rate

50.7%

37–36 · below the 405 draws of a regular

Against an average centre

51.4%

Opponents won 50.7% of their draws; an average centre would have won 49.3% against them.

Wins above average

+1

Draws won beyond what an average centre facing the same opponents would have won.

Draws per game

2.6

73 draws in all.

By dot, attacking to the right

44%16 · +0.643%14 · +2.431%13 · −0.1100%3 · –33%3 · +4.867%3 · −1.175%4 · 0.070%10 · +7.257%7 · −0.6Attacking zone →← Defending zone

Win rate at each dot; the small numbers are draws and the xG swing (×100) of winning rather than losing there.

By zone

  • Offensive zone43.3% 13–17
  • Neutral zone55.2% 16–13
  • Defensive zone57.1% 8–6

By strength

  • Even strength51.5% 34–32
  • Power play100.0% 1–0
  • Shorthanded33.3% 2–4

What a win leads to

Shot attempts in the next 20 seconds, for minus against, per 100 draws: +3 after a win, −14 after a loss. Each win was worth 1.2 expected goals per 100 draws more than a loss.

Most-faced opponents

Season by season

SeasonDrawsWin rateAgainst average
2009–104143.9%43.6%
2010–113259.4%61.4%

Finishing

Did the goals match the chances?

Goals against expected goals

Cumulative goals (solid) and individual xG (dashed) through the season. The gap is finishing: above the dashed line, the player scored more than an average shooter would from the same chances.

+1.0 goals above expected

0246820406080Game

Goals above expected, everyone at the same position with 20+ games

−20−100+10+20+30+40