Skip to content
Ice Lab

Right wing · #18

David Moss

Age
44
Shoots
Right
Height
193 cm
Weight
95 kg
Born
Livonia, USA
Draft
2001, round 7, #220 (CGY)

Career · 2009–10 to 2014–15

Games
338
Goals
44
Points
110
TOI per game
14:04
xGF% (5v5)
52.5%
Goals above expected
−21.1

Season by season

The regular-season line for each season, with the total, by team for traded players.

2009–10CGY648917−913:431336.0%412.0–
2010–11CGY58171330+913:4112713.4%713.657.9%
2011–12CGY32279−314:01822.4%07.854.1%
2012–13PHX4551520+315:33826.1%28.154.8%
2013–14PHX7981422−114:391515.3%212.948.1%
2014–15ARI604812−1812:55964.2%210.851.4%
Total3 teams3384466110−1914:046716.6%1765.152.5%

Form

Rolling averages smooth out single games so the trend shows.

Form, ten-game rolling

Points and individual expected goals per game (left scale), averaged over the previous ten games. Ice time is on the second chart.

Points per gameixG per gameTOI per game (minutes)
00.20.40.60.8150100150200250300
10m12m14m16m18m50100150200250300Game

Player card

How 2009–10 to 2014–15 compares with everyone else at the position over the same seasons, and the players with the most similar profile.

Overall rating

2nd line

58th percentile among qualified forwards, blending scoring 40%, play-driving 40%, usage 20%.

  1. 1st line
  2. 2nd line
  3. 3rd line
  4. 4th line
  5. Extra / AHL

Scoring

4th line
  • Goals /600.5637th pct
  • Assists /600.8344th pct
  • ixG /600.8273rd pct
  • Goals above expected−21.11st pct

Play-driving

1st line
  • xGF% (5v5)52.5%77th pct
  • CF% (5v5)52.3%78th pct
  • Relative xGF%+4.389th pct
  • Penalty diff /600.1052nd pct

Usage

3rd line
  • TOI per game14:0452nd pct
  • PP time share13.1%43rd pct
  • Offensive zone starts42.0%17th pct
  • Quality of competition24.5%64th pct

Percentiles among forwards with 200+ minutes at 5-on-5 and 20+ games. Ratings rank each column's average percentile among the same players and read it as a role on a depth chart (how).

Faceoffs

How often Moss wins the draw over 2009–10 to 2014–15, against whom and where, and what a win leads to. Ranked among players with 1134+ draws over the same seasons.

Win rate

41.7%

301–421 · below the 1134 draws of a regular

Against an average centre

42.7%

Opponents won 51.0% of their draws; an average centre would have won 49.0% against them.

Wins above average

−53

Draws won beyond what an average centre facing the same opponents would have won.

Draws per game

4.0

722 draws in all.

By dot, attacking to the right

40%97 · +0.142%72 · +2.737%193 · +0.648%33 · +3.245%22 · +2.655%29 · +1.344%36 · +0.852%54 · −0.540%186 · +1.4Attacking zone →← Defending zone

Win rate at each dot; the small numbers are draws and the xG swing (×100) of winning rather than losing there.

By zone

  • Offensive zone38.1% 101–164
  • Neutral zone44.7% 97–120
  • Defensive zone42.9% 103–137

By strength

  • Even strength41.9% 226–314
  • Power play44.3% 27–34
  • Shorthanded38.5% 45–72

What a win leads to

Shot attempts in the next 20 seconds, for minus against, per 100 draws: +20 after a win, −8 after a loss. Each win was worth 1.0 expected goals per 100 draws more than a loss.

Most-faced opponents

Season by season

SeasonDrawsWin rateAgainst average
2009–104334.9%34.6%
2010–1136443.1%44.4%
2011–1222042.3%43.2%
2012–133129.0%30.5%
2013–145141.2%42.2%
2014–151346.2%45.0%

Finishing

Did the goals match the chances?

Goals against expected goals

Cumulative goals (solid) and individual xG (dashed) through the season. The gap is finishing: above the dashed line, the player scored more than an average shooter would from the same chances.

−21.1 goals above expected

020406050100150200250300Game

Goals above expected, everyone at the same position with 20+ games

−40−200+20+40+60+80+100+120