- Age
- 37
- Shoots
- Left
- Height
- 180 cm
- Weight
- 87 kg
- Born
- Hamilton, CAN
- Draft
- 2009, round 6, #165 (FLA)
Career · 2 seasons
- Games
- 24
- Goals
- 1
- Points
- 1
- TOI per game
- 10:46
- xGF% (5v5)
- 47.4%
- Goals above expected
- −1.3
Season by season
The regular-season line for each season, with the total, by team for traded players.
Form
Rolling averages smooth out single games so the trend shows.
Points and individual expected goals per game (left scale), averaged over the previous ten games. Ice time is on the second chart.
Player card
How 2 seasons compares with everyone else at the position over the same seasons, and the players with the most similar profile.
Overall rating
Extra / AHL
8th percentile among qualified forwards, blending scoring 40%, play-driving 40%, usage 20%.
- 1st line
- 2nd line
- 3rd line
- 4th line
- Extra / AHL
Scoring
Extra / AHL- Goals /600.236th pct
- Assists /600.000th pct
- ixG /600.5218th pct
- Goals above expected−1.338th pct
Play-driving
4th line- xGF% (5v5)47.4%30th pct
- CF% (5v5)47.1%26th pct
- Relative xGF%+1.161st pct
- Penalty diff /60-1.162nd pct
Usage
Extra / AHL- TOI per game10:4616th pct
- PP time share0.5%3rd pct
- Offensive zone starts34.0%7th pct
- Quality of competition23.6%22nd pct
Percentiles among forwards with 200+ minutes at 5-on-5 and 20+ games. Ratings rank each column's average percentile among the same players and read it as a role on a depth chart (how).
Most similar players this season
Faceoffs
How often Timmins wins the draw over 2 seasons, against whom and where, and what a win leads to. Ranked among players with 320+ draws over the same seasons.
Win rate
47.2%
76–85 · below the 320 draws of a regular
Against an average centre
47.0%
Opponents won 49.7% of their draws; an average centre would have won 50.3% against them.
Wins above average
−5
Draws won beyond what an average centre facing the same opponents would have won.
Draws per game
6.7
161 draws in all.
By dot, attacking to the right
Win rate at each dot; the small numbers are draws and the xG swing (×100) of winning rather than losing there.
By zone
- Offensive zone58.1% 25–18
- Neutral zone49.0% 25–26
- Defensive zone38.8% 26–41
By strength
- Even strength48.6% 67–71
- Power play33.3% 1–2
- Shorthanded35.3% 6–11
What a win leads to
Shot attempts in the next 20 seconds, for minus against, per 100 draws: +9 after a win, −18 after a loss. Each win was worth 1.5 expected goals per 100 draws more than a loss.
Most-faced opponents
- David Desharnais50.0% 3–3
- Nik Antropov66.7% 4–2
- Tim Sestito40.0% 2–3
- Jason Arnott60.0% 3–2
- Claude Giroux20.0% 1–4
- Logan Couture50.0% 2–2
- Blair Betts50.0% 2–2
- Henrik Zetterberg25.0% 1–3
Season by season
| Season | Draws | Win rate | Against average |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2010–11 | 130 | 46.9% | 46.6% |
| 2012–13 | 31 | 48.4% | 48.3% |
Cumulative goals (solid) and individual xG (dashed) through the season. The gap is finishing: above the dashed line, the player scored more than an average shooter would from the same chances.
−1.3 goals above expected
Goals above expected, everyone at the same position with 20+ games