- Age
- 35
- Shoots
- Right
- Height
- 188 cm
- Weight
- 89 kg
- Born
- Cadca, SVK
- Draft
- Undrafted
Career · 2015–16 to 2017–18
- Games
- 24
- Goals
- 0
- Points
- 3
- TOI per game
- 10:15
- xGF% (5v5)
- 51.6%
- Goals above expected
- −2.7
Season by season
The regular-season line for each season, with the total, by team for traded players.
Form
Rolling averages smooth out single games so the trend shows.
Points and individual expected goals per game (left scale), averaged over the previous ten games. Ice time is on the second chart.
Player card
How 2015–16 to 2017–18 compares with everyone else at the position over the same seasons, and the players with the most similar profile.
Overall rating
3rd line
43rd percentile among qualified forwards, blending scoring 40%, play-driving 40%, usage 20%.
- 1st line
- 2nd line
- 3rd line
- 4th line
- Extra / AHL
Scoring
4th line- Goals /600.001st pct
- Assists /600.7336th pct
- ixG /600.6644th pct
- Goals above expected−2.731st pct
Play-driving
1st line- xGF% (5v5)51.6%72nd pct
- CF% (5v5)52.7%85th pct
- Relative xGF%+3.789th pct
- Penalty diff /600.2468th pct
Usage
Extra / AHL- TOI per game10:1511th pct
- PP time share1.7%16th pct
- Offensive zone starts46.6%29th pct
- Quality of competition22.7%8th pct
Percentiles among forwards with 200+ minutes at 5-on-5 and 20+ games. Ratings rank each column's average percentile among the same players and read it as a role on a depth chart (how).
Most similar players this season
Faceoffs
How often Hrivik wins the draw over 2015–16 to 2017–18, against whom and where, and what a win leads to. Ranked among players with 605+ draws over the same seasons.
Win rate
40.7%
35–51 · below the 605 draws of a regular
Against an average centre
40.4%
Opponents won 49.7% of their draws; an average centre would have won 50.3% against them.
Wins above average
−8
Draws won beyond what an average centre facing the same opponents would have won.
Draws per game
5.4
86 draws in all.
By dot, attacking to the right
Win rate at each dot; the small numbers are draws and the xG swing (×100) of winning rather than losing there.
By zone
- Offensive zone46.4% 13–15
- Neutral zone38.5% 15–24
- Defensive zone36.8% 7–12
By strength
- Even strength41.2% 35–50
- Power play0.0% 0–1
What a win leads to
Shot attempts in the next 20 seconds, for minus against, per 100 draws: +17 after a win, −10 after a loss. Each win was worth 0.6 expected goals per 100 draws more than a loss.
Most-faced opponents
- Derek Grant85.7% 6–1
- Lukas Sedlak66.7% 4–2
- Patrick Cannone40.0% 2–3
- Radek Faksa66.7% 2–1
- Colton Sissons66.7% 2–1
- Matt Cullen0.0% 0–3
- Christian Dvorak33.3% 1–2
- Mikhail Grigorenko33.3% 1–2
Season by season
| Season | Draws | Win rate | Against average |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2015–16 | 5 | 60.0% | 58.0% |
| 2016–17 | 80 | 40.0% | 39.8% |
| 2017–18 | 1 | 0.0% | 2.9% |
Cumulative goals (solid) and individual xG (dashed) through the season. The gap is finishing: above the dashed line, the player scored more than an average shooter would from the same chances.
−2.7 goals above expected
Goals above expected, everyone at the same position with 20+ games