Skip to content
Ice Lab
Age
38
Shoots
Right
Height
173 cm
Weight
79 kg
Born
Milford, USA
Draft
Undrafted

Career · 2012–13 to 2015–16

Games
139
Goals
24
Points
53
TOI per game
14:36
xGF% (5v5)
49.4%
Goals above expected
+3.4

Season by season

The regular-season line for each season, with the total, by team for traded players.

2012–13EDM1000018:150–00.063.4%
2013–14EDM4141418−715:04705.7%35.747.5%
2014–15EDM367512−715:235413.0%16.147.1%
2014–15NSH4101010:35333.3%00.241.5%
2014–15PIT10022+112:05130.0%01.163.2%
2014–15ARI279716−415:415915.3%34.449.1%
2014–15All teams77171431−1014:4812913.2%411.849.6%
2015–16TOR20314012:41437.0%03.151.6%
Total5 teams139242953−1714:362429.9%720.649.4%

Form

Rolling averages smooth out single games so the trend shows.

Form, ten-game rolling

Points and individual expected goals per game (left scale), averaged over the previous ten games. Ice time is on the second chart.

Points per gameixG per gameTOI per game (minutes)
00.20.40.60.8120406080100120
10m12m14m16m18m20m20406080100120Game

Player card

How 2012–13 to 2015–16 compares with everyone else at the position over the same seasons, and the players with the most similar profile.

Overall rating

2nd line

65th percentile among qualified forwards, blending scoring 40%, play-driving 40%, usage 20%.

  1. 1st line
  2. 2nd line
  3. 3rd line
  4. 4th line
  5. Extra / AHL

Scoring

2nd line
  • Goals /600.7161st pct
  • Assists /600.8652nd pct
  • ixG /600.6138th pct
  • Goals above expected+3.480th pct

Play-driving

2nd line
  • xGF% (5v5)49.4%52nd pct
  • CF% (5v5)52.2%78th pct
  • Relative xGF%+1.571st pct
  • Penalty diff /600.3073rd pct

Usage

3rd line
  • TOI per game14:3659th pct
  • PP time share21.6%54th pct
  • Offensive zone starts62.8%71st pct
  • Quality of competition23.8%42nd pct

Percentiles among forwards with 200+ minutes at 5-on-5 and 20+ games. Ratings rank each column's average percentile among the same players and read it as a role on a depth chart (how).

Faceoffs

How often Arcobello wins the draw over 2012–13 to 2015–16, against whom and where, and what a win leads to. Ranked among players with 729+ draws over the same seasons.

Win rate

50.9%

812–783 · #72 of 182 regulars, 61st percentile

Against an average centre

50.5%

Opponents won 49.6% of their draws; an average centre would have won 50.4% against them.

Wins above average

+8

Draws won beyond what an average centre facing the same opponents would have won.

Draws per game

12.7

1,595 draws in all.

By dot, attacking to the right

48%249 · +0.453%260 · +0.653%373 · +3.054%76 · +3.549%101 · +3.044%72 · −0.963%59 · −1.753%166 · +0.847%239 · +2.5Attacking zone →← Defending zone

Win rate at each dot; the small numbers are draws and the xG swing (×100) of winning rather than losing there.

By zone

  • Offensive zone52.5% 333–301
  • Neutral zone49.9% 278–279
  • Defensive zone49.8% 201–203

By strength

  • Even strength50.6% 712–696
  • Power play60.8% 79–51
  • Shorthanded36.8% 21–36

What a win leads to

Shot attempts in the next 20 seconds, for minus against, per 100 draws: +16 after a win, −13 after a loss. Each win was worth 1.6 expected goals per 100 draws more than a loss.

Most-faced opponents

Season by season

SeasonDrawsWin rateAgainst average
2012–131030.0%27.1%
2013–1440451.0%51.3%
2014–1593950.2%49.5%
2015–1624254.5%54.1%

Finishing

Did the goals match the chances?

Goals against expected goals

Cumulative goals (solid) and individual xG (dashed) through the season. The gap is finishing: above the dashed line, the player scored more than an average shooter would from the same chances.

+3.4 goals above expected

051015202520406080100120Game

Goals above expected, everyone at the same position with 20+ games

−200+20+40+60