Skip to content
Ice Lab

Centre · #10

Roman Cervenka

Age
40
Shoots
Left
Height
180 cm
Weight
91 kg
Born
Praha, CZE
Draft
Undrafted

2012–13

Games
39
Goals
9
Points
17
TOI per game
13:08
xGF% (5v5)
45.5%
Goals above expected
+2.7

Season

The regular-season line, by team for traded players.

2012–13CGY399817−1313:085117.6%46.345.5%

Form

Rolling averages smooth out single games so the trend shows.

Form, ten-game rolling

Points and individual expected goals per game (left scale), averaged over the previous ten games. Ice time is on the second chart.

Points per gameixG per gameTOI per game (minutes)
00.10.20.30.40.50.6101520253035
11m12m13m14m15m16m101520253035Game

Player card

How this season compares with everyone else at the position, and the players with the most similar profile.

Overall rating

3rd line

39th percentile among qualified forwards, blending scoring 40%, play-driving 40%, usage 20%.

  1. 1st line
  2. 2nd line
  3. 3rd line
  4. 4th line
  5. Extra / AHL

Scoring

1st line
  • Goals /601.0583rd pct
  • Assists /600.9449th pct
  • ixG /600.7357th pct
  • Goals above expected+2.785th pct

Play-driving

Extra / AHL
  • xGF% (5v5)45.5%23rd pct
  • CF% (5v5)46.6%25th pct
  • Relative xGF%−4.426th pct
  • Penalty diff /60-0.3515th pct

Usage

3rd line
  • TOI per game13:0830th pct
  • PP time share29.4%49th pct
  • Offensive zone starts58.9%56th pct
  • Quality of competition24.7%50th pct

Percentiles among forwards with 200+ minutes at 5-on-5 and 20+ games. Ratings rank each column's average percentile among the same players and read it as a role on a depth chart (how).

Faceoffs

How often Cervenka wins the draw this season, against whom and where, and what a win leads to. Ranked among players with 117+ draws over the same seasons.

Win rate

46.4%

58–67 · #122 of 165 regulars, 26th percentile

Against an average centre

47.1%

Opponents won 50.7% of their draws; an average centre would have won 49.3% against them.

Wins above average

−4

Draws won beyond what an average centre facing the same opponents would have won.

Draws per game

4.2

125 draws in all.

By dot, attacking to the right

50%14 · +2.251%37 · +2.247%15 · +5.644%9 · +1.20%4 · –33%3 · 0.0100%2 · –52%21 · +2.435%20 · +2.1Attacking zone →← Defending zone

Win rate at each dot; the small numbers are draws and the xG swing (×100) of winning rather than losing there.

By zone

  • Offensive zone50.0% 26–26
  • Neutral zone43.8% 14–18
  • Defensive zone43.9% 18–23

By strength

  • Even strength40.9% 38–55
  • Power play66.7% 20–10
  • Shorthanded0.0% 0–2

What a win leads to

Shot attempts in the next 20 seconds, for minus against, per 100 draws: +26 after a win, −16 after a loss. Each win was worth 2.3 expected goals per 100 draws more than a loss.

Most-faced opponents

Finishing

Did the goals match the chances?

Goals against expected goals

Cumulative goals (solid) and individual xG (dashed) through the season. The gap is finishing: above the dashed line, the player scored more than an average shooter would from the same chances.

+2.7 goals above expected

02468105101520253035Game

Goals above expected, everyone at the same position with 20+ games

−10−50+5+10