Eastern Conference · Metropolitan Division
Columbus Blue Jackets
2022–23·25–48–9·59 points·8th in the Metropolitan, 16th in the Eastern
- Points
- 59#31
- Goal differential
- −116#31
- xGF% (5v5, adj.)
- 43.8%#29
- Power play
- 18.3%#26
- Penalty kill
- 75.1%#25
- GSAx
- −36.5#30
Skaters
Everyone who played for the Blue Jackets. Traded players show only their games for this team. Use Columns for advanced stats.
| 80 | 21 | 53 | 74 | −33 | 19:25 | 220 | 9.5% | 24 | 26.0 | −5.0 | 47.7% | |
| 55 | 22 | 30 | 52 | −12 | 19:07 | 184 | 12.0% | 16 | 16.7 | +5.3 | 47.1% | |
| 68 | 26 | 19 | 45 | −32 | 20:12 | 214 | 12.1% | 11 | 30.3 | −4.3 | 48.4% | |
| 77 | 11 | 33 | 44 | −14 | 16:27 | 123 | 8.9% | 9 | 13.1 | −2.1 | 41.6% | |
| 79 | 16 | 24 | 40 | −19 | 14:31 | 126 | 12.7% | 12 | 12.3 | +3.7 | 41.7% | |
| 59 | 21 | 4 | 25 | −23 | 16:11 | 131 | 16.0% | 8 | 15.9 | +5.1 | 45.1% | |
| 72 | 12 | 12 | 24 | −21 | 13:57 | 98 | 12.2% | 0 | 13.3 | −1.3 | 41.9% | |
| 46 | 5 | 19 | 24 | −12 | 18:38 | 68 | 7.4% | 9 | 3.7 | +1.3 | 45.6% | |
| 48 | 10 | 12 | 22 | −11 | 17:48 | 97 | 10.3% | 0 | 12.6 | −2.6 | 46.3% | |
| 55 | 7 | 15 | 22 | −11 | 12:07 | 95 | 7.4% | 6 | 9.6 | −2.6 | 46.5% | |
| 71 | 11 | 9 | 20 | −28 | 15:04 | 100 | 11.0% | 1 | 11.2 | −0.2 | 41.0% | |
| 66 | 5 | 10 | 15 | −20 | 11:38 | 75 | 6.7% | 0 | 8.6 | −3.6 | 44.3% | |
| 36 | 4 | 10 | 14 | −16 | 19:10 | 50 | 8.0% | 4 | 3.1 | +0.9 | 46.7% | |
| 62 | 7 | 7 | 14 | −26 | 12:08 | 67 | 10.4% | 0 | 8.3 | −1.3 | 42.3% | |
| 51 | 2 | 12 | 14 | −18 | 15:57 | 61 | 3.3% | 1 | 2.3 | −0.3 | 45.4% | |
| 30 | 4 | 9 | 13 | −6 | 13:15 | 44 | 9.1% | 2 | 3.9 | +0.1 | 44.4% | |
| 80 | 6 | 7 | 13 | −41 | 21:15 | 90 | 6.7% | 0 | 3.0 | +3.0 | 43.8% | |
| 70 | 1 | 12 | 13 | −24 | 21:18 | 102 | 1.0% | 0 | 3.2 | −2.2 | 41.4% | |
| 64 | 3 | 8 | 11 | −23 | 13:19 | 93 | 3.2% | 3 | 10.8 | −7.8 | 44.7% | |
| 33 | 3 | 8 | 11 | −9 | 18:09 | 34 | 8.8% | 6 | 1.3 | +1.7 | 45.4% | |
| 52 | 3 | 7 | 10 | −8 | 22:20 | 61 | 4.9% | 0 | 4.2 | −1.2 | 44.6% | |
| 13 | 3 | 5 | 8 | −6 | 23:36 | 41 | 7.3% | 2 | 2.3 | +0.7 | 53.2% | |
| 11 | 1 | 5 | 6 | −7 | 15:58 | 17 | 5.9% | 1 | 1.5 | −0.5 | 32.9% | |
| 14 | 1 | 5 | 6 | −2 | 15:42 | 16 | 6.3% | 1 | 0.7 | +0.3 | 41.3% | |
| 24 | 0 | 4 | 4 | −7 | 15:13 | 25 | 0.0% | 1 | 1.3 | −1.3 | 45.6% | |
| 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | −3 | 13:23 | 10 | 20.0% | 0 | 1.9 | +0.1 | 56.5% | |
| 59 | 1 | 2 | 3 | −26 | 16:58 | 58 | 1.7% | 0 | 3.2 | −2.2 | 45.6% | |
| 16 | 2 | 1 | 3 | −4 | 11:18 | 12 | 16.7% | 0 | 1.7 | +0.3 | 45.0% | |
| 12 | 0 | 2 | 2 | −4 | 12:14 | 13 | 0.0% | 0 | 1.2 | −1.2 | 37.0% | |
| 5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | −1 | 10:28 | 9 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.6 | −0.6 | 42.1% |
Goalies
Save percentage treats every shot alike; GSAx credits goalies for the difficulty of the shots they faced.
| 30 | 27 | 7 | 18 | 2 | .876 | 4.23 | 0 | −28.4 | .702 | |
| 28 | 26 | 11 | 11 | 3 | .913 | 3.17 | 0 | +8.3 | .797 | |
| 17 | 16 | 4 | 11 | 1 | .892 | 3.91 | 0 | −9.5 | .686 | |
| 16 | 10 | 2 | 6 | 3 | .877 | 4.29 | 0 | −8.0 | .618 | |
| 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | .864 | 4.57 | 0 | −2.1 | 1.000 | |
| 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | .939 | 3.05 | 0 | +3.1 | .929 |
Player cards
Pick a player to see where they rank among everyone at their position, and who they most resemble statistically.
Overall rating
Extra / AHL
19th percentile among qualified defencemen, blending scoring 30%, play-driving 50%, usage 20%.
- 1st pair
- 2nd pair
- 3rd pair
- Extra / AHL
Scoring
Extra / AHL- Goals /600.2156th pct
- Assists /600.256th pct
- ixG /600.107th pct
- Shots /603.1820th pct
Play-driving
Extra / AHL- xGF% (5v5)43.8%14th pct
- CF% (5v5)44.0%12th pct
- Relative xGF%−0.552nd pct
- xGA /60 (lower is better)2.8517th pct
Usage
1st pair- TOI per game21:1573rd pct
- PP time share2.2%41st pct
- PK time share69.0%99th pct
- Quality of competition24.7%63rd pct
Percentiles among defencemen with 200+ minutes at 5-on-5 and 20+ games. Ratings rank each column's average percentile among the same players and read it as a role on a depth chart (how).
Most similar players this season
Who plays the tough minutes?
Coaches shelter some players with offensive-zone starts and weaker opponents, and trust others with the hardest assignments. Skaters with 100+ minutes at 5-on-5.
Across: share of zone starts in the attacking end (sheltered usage to the right). Up: quality of the opponents faced. Bubble size is 5-on-5 ice time; colour is relative xGF%, blue when the team does better with the player on the ice.