Eastern Conference · Atlantic Division
Montréal Canadiens
2019–20·31–31–9·71 points·5th in the Atlantic, 12th in the Eastern
- Points
- 71#24
- Goal differential
- −12#24
- xGF% (5v5, adj.)
- 53.8%#3
- Power play
- 17.2%#23
- Penalty kill
- 80.6%#18
- GSAx
- −17.9#28
Skaters
Everyone who played for the Canadiens. Traded players show only their games for this team. Use Columns for advanced stats.
| 68 | 22 | 39 | 61 | +5 | 16:18 | 162 | 13.6% | 14 | 16.5 | +5.5 | 59.6% | |
| 71 | 13 | 34 | 47 | +18 | 18:51 | 131 | 9.9% | 4 | 15.7 | −2.7 | 59.4% | |
| 71 | 17 | 27 | 44 | −3 | 17:06 | 179 | 9.5% | 11 | 17.6 | −0.6 | 52.3% | |
| 59 | 22 | 21 | 43 | +9 | 16:55 | 226 | 9.7% | 5 | 25.1 | −3.1 | 59.5% | |
| 71 | 13 | 28 | 41 | −15 | 15:59 | 138 | 9.4% | 14 | 13.2 | −0.2 | 52.3% | |
| 71 | 11 | 29 | 40 | −10 | 23:39 | 158 | 7.0% | 11 | 9.1 | +1.9 | 56.1% | |
| 65 | 15 | 21 | 36 | +8 | 24:00 | 185 | 8.1% | 8 | 9.5 | +5.5 | 53.6% | |
| 58 | 16 | 14 | 30 | +2 | 17:14 | 155 | 10.3% | 4 | 17.4 | −1.4 | 50.6% | |
| 70 | 13 | 14 | 27 | +2 | 15:26 | 140 | 9.3% | 0 | 14.6 | −1.6 | 53.2% | |
| 58 | 9 | 13 | 22 | +1 | 13:28 | 105 | 8.6% | 4 | 12.3 | −3.3 | 53.9% | |
| 69 | 9 | 12 | 21 | +5 | 23:08 | 130 | 6.9% | 0 | 6.6 | +2.4 | 52.0% | |
| 49 | 8 | 7 | 15 | −8 | 13:37 | 86 | 9.3% | 5 | 9.9 | −1.9 | 54.3% | |
| 27 | 7 | 8 | 15 | −6 | 15:42 | 51 | 13.7% | 4 | 4.6 | +2.4 | 50.4% | |
| 63 | 4 | 10 | 14 | −2 | 12:48 | 62 | 6.5% | 0 | 7.3 | −3.3 | 47.5% | |
| 22 | 6 | 7 | 13 | +6 | 18:54 | 62 | 9.7% | 2 | 6.4 | −0.4 | 59.5% | |
| 51 | 4 | 7 | 11 | +5 | 16:00 | 57 | 7.0% | 1 | 3.1 | +0.9 | 51.8% | |
| 29 | 4 | 6 | 10 | +5 | 14:20 | 29 | 13.8% | 0 | 3.9 | +0.1 | 51.7% | |
| 36 | 6 | 2 | 8 | −11 | 13:00 | 55 | 10.9% | 2 | 5.6 | +0.4 | 45.2% | |
| 56 | 0 | 7 | 7 | −1 | 17:08 | 101 | 0.0% | 0 | 3.7 | −3.7 | 56.2% | |
| 23 | 1 | 4 | 5 | +1 | 9:16 | 15 | 6.7% | 0 | 1.5 | −0.5 | 46.2% | |
| 14 | 0 | 4 | 4 | +2 | 13:59 | 21 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.9 | −0.9 | 55.2% | |
| 20 | 1 | 2 | 3 | +1 | 17:38 | 21 | 4.8% | 0 | 1.5 | −0.5 | 53.3% | |
| 13 | 2 | 1 | 3 | +1 | 10:21 | 14 | 14.3% | 0 | 1.4 | +0.6 | 54.1% | |
| 16 | 1 | 1 | 2 | −1 | 14:26 | 13 | 7.7% | 0 | 0.5 | +0.5 | 54.1% | |
| 27 | 1 | 1 | 2 | −4 | 10:20 | 26 | 3.8% | 0 | 2.8 | −1.8 | 47.7% | |
| 15 | 1 | 1 | 2 | −9 | 11:32 | 22 | 4.5% | 0 | 1.6 | −0.6 | 39.5% | |
| 12 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 13:54 | 8 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.4 | −0.4 | 56.3% | |
| 41 | 1 | 0 | 1 | −4 | 14:21 | 45 | 2.2% | 0 | 1.4 | −0.4 | 48.0% | |
| 7 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 8:01 | 7 | 14.3% | 0 | 0.8 | +0.2 | 60.8% | |
| 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | −4 | 8:06 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.1 | −0.1 | 22.3% |
Goalies
Save percentage treats every shot alike; GSAx credits goalies for the difficulty of the shots they faced.
| 58 | 58 | 27 | 25 | 6 | .909 | 2.79 | 4 | −8.4 | .791 | |
| 6 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | .875 | 4.24 | 0 | −8.6 | .692 | |
| 6 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 0 | .888 | 3.33 | 0 | −1.0 | .692 | |
| 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | .931 | 2.52 | 0 | +0.1 | .667 |
Player cards
Pick a player to see where they rank among everyone at their position, and who they most resemble statistically.
Overall rating
Starter
61st percentile among qualified goalies, blending goaltending 75%, usage 25%.
- Starter
- Backup
- Third string / AHL
Goaltending
Backup- Save %.90945th pct
- GSAx−8.415th pct
- GSAx /60-0.1525th pct
- High-danger SV%.79173rd pct
- Medium-danger SV%.86536th pct
- Low-danger SV%.95917th pct
- Rebound control+1.1883rd pct
- GAA (lower is better)2.7945th pct
Usage
Starter- Games started5899th pct
- Shots faced /6030.6139th pct
- xG faced /602.6431st pct
Percentiles among goalies with 20+ games. Ratings rank each column's average percentile among the same players and read it as a role on a depth chart (how).
Most similar players this season
Who plays the tough minutes?
Coaches shelter some players with offensive-zone starts and weaker opponents, and trust others with the hardest assignments. Skaters with 100+ minutes at 5-on-5.
Across: share of zone starts in the attacking end (sheltered usage to the right). Up: quality of the opponents faced. Bubble size is 5-on-5 ice time; colour is relative xGF%, blue when the team does better with the player on the ice.