Western Conference · Pacific Division
Vancouver Canucks
2022–23·38–37–7·83 points·6th in the Pacific, 11th in the Western
- Points
- 83#22
- Goal differential
- −26#23
- xGF% (5v5, adj.)
- 47.0%#25
- Power play
- 22.7%#11
- Penalty kill
- 71.6%#32
- GSAx
- −41.5#32
Skaters
Everyone who played for the Canucks. Traded players show only their games for this team. Use Columns for advanced stats.
| 80 | 39 | 63 | 102 | +16 | 20:33 | 257 | 15.2% | 25 | 32.2 | +6.8 | 52.7% | |
| 81 | 32 | 50 | 82 | −7 | 20:41 | 223 | 14.3% | 30 | 24.7 | +7.3 | 46.9% | |
| 78 | 7 | 69 | 76 | +15 | 25:40 | 154 | 4.5% | 34 | 7.9 | −0.9 | 49.4% | |
| 81 | 39 | 35 | 74 | +9 | 16:15 | 143 | 27.3% | 19 | 21.3 | +17.7 | 52.3% | |
| 74 | 18 | 37 | 55 | −20 | 17:14 | 178 | 10.1% | 16 | 23.4 | −5.4 | 44.1% | |
| 49 | 31 | 23 | 54 | +3 | 20:49 | 143 | 21.7% | 18 | 20.3 | +10.7 | 47.1% | |
| 81 | 17 | 29 | 46 | −5 | 15:07 | 167 | 10.2% | 12 | 16.2 | +0.8 | 48.2% | |
| 46 | 13 | 15 | 28 | +3 | 16:55 | 91 | 14.3% | 3 | 10.0 | +3.0 | 46.8% | |
| 79 | 11 | 12 | 23 | −16 | 11:31 | 71 | 15.5% | 1 | 10.3 | +0.7 | 46.5% | |
| 54 | 2 | 20 | 22 | −24 | 20:11 | 90 | 2.2% | 4 | 3.0 | −1.0 | 44.7% | |
| 55 | 3 | 18 | 21 | +9 | 17:11 | 68 | 4.4% | 0 | 2.0 | +1.0 | 45.5% | |
| 33 | 9 | 11 | 20 | −6 | 16:59 | 63 | 14.3% | 4 | 9.1 | −0.1 | 50.0% | |
| 78 | 1 | 16 | 17 | −16 | 20:54 | 100 | 1.0% | 0 | 5.0 | −4.0 | 44.5% | |
| 63 | 11 | 6 | 17 | −9 | 11:32 | 94 | 11.7% | 5 | 9.7 | +1.3 | 44.0% | |
| 68 | 4 | 12 | 16 | −12 | 12:42 | 50 | 8.0% | 0 | 6.4 | −2.4 | 43.2% | |
| 61 | 3 | 13 | 16 | +6 | 18:32 | 75 | 4.0% | 0 | 3.5 | −0.5 | 50.2% | |
| 30 | 6 | 6 | 12 | −1 | 14:34 | 71 | 8.5% | 1 | 7.1 | −1.1 | 54.8% | |
| 25 | 3 | 6 | 9 | −4 | 12:03 | 29 | 10.3% | 0 | 2.8 | +0.2 | 44.0% | |
| 47 | 4 | 4 | 8 | −11 | 10:39 | 65 | 6.2% | 0 | 5.7 | −1.7 | 38.3% | |
| 39 | 4 | 3 | 7 | −5 | 11:50 | 41 | 9.8% | 0 | 4.4 | −0.4 | 47.4% | |
| 45 | 3 | 2 | 5 | −5 | 12:10 | 54 | 5.6% | 0 | 5.9 | −2.9 | 45.4% | |
| 14 | 1 | 4 | 5 | −9 | 13:30 | 17 | 5.9% | 1 | 2.1 | −1.1 | 38.8% | |
| 48 | 2 | 3 | 5 | −4 | 17:22 | 47 | 4.3% | 0 | 1.7 | +0.3 | 49.2% | |
| 32 | 0 | 5 | 5 | −14 | 16:06 | 29 | 0.0% | 0 | 1.2 | −1.2 | 45.2% | |
| 17 | 1 | 2 | 3 | −2 | 16:32 | 15 | 6.7% | 0 | 0.6 | +0.4 | 47.9% | |
| 11 | 1 | 2 | 3 | +3 | 12:50 | 15 | 6.7% | 0 | 2.0 | −1.0 | 50.2% | |
| 16 | 0 | 3 | 3 | +5 | 15:45 | 16 | 0.0% | 1 | 0.9 | −0.9 | 50.9% | |
| 7 | 0 | 3 | 3 | −1 | 17:28 | 4 | 0.0% | 2 | 0.2 | −0.2 | 31.4% | |
| 11 | 1 | 1 | 2 | −1 | 14:14 | 12 | 8.3% | 0 | 0.5 | +0.5 | 43.0% | |
| 16 | 1 | 1 | 2 | −3 | 10:50 | 17 | 5.9% | 2 | 2.1 | −1.1 | 42.5% |
Goalies
Save percentage treats every shot alike; GSAx credits goalies for the difficulty of the shots they faced.
| 32 | 32 | 14 | 14 | 4 | .901 | 3.16 | 1 | −6.8 | .755 | |
| 29 | 27 | 11 | 15 | 1 | .871 | 3.99 | 0 | −26.2 | .725 | |
| 20 | 18 | 10 | 6 | 2 | .882 | 3.28 | 0 | −7.6 | .730 | |
| 5 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | .908 | 2.75 | 0 | −0.9 | .800 |
Player cards
Pick a player to see where they rank among everyone at their position, and who they most resemble statistically.
Overall rating
1st pair
84th percentile among qualified defencemen, blending scoring 30%, play-driving 50%, usage 20%.
- 1st pair
- 2nd pair
- 3rd pair
- Extra / AHL
Scoring
1st pair- Goals /600.2155th pct
- Assists /602.0799th pct
- ixG /600.2467th pct
- Shots /604.6264th pct
Play-driving
2nd pair- xGF% (5v5)49.4%45th pct
- CF% (5v5)51.9%71st pct
- Relative xGF%+3.381st pct
- xGA /60 (lower is better)2.4466th pct
Usage
1st pair- TOI per game25:4099th pct
- PP time share74.7%99th pct
- PK time share28.9%43rd pct
- Quality of competition24.6%60th pct
Percentiles among defencemen with 200+ minutes at 5-on-5 and 20+ games. Ratings rank each column's average percentile among the same players and read it as a role on a depth chart (how).
Most similar players this season
Who plays the tough minutes?
Coaches shelter some players with offensive-zone starts and weaker opponents, and trust others with the hardest assignments. Skaters with 100+ minutes at 5-on-5.
Across: share of zone starts in the attacking end (sheltered usage to the right). Up: quality of the opponents faced. Bubble size is 5-on-5 ice time; colour is relative xGF%, blue when the team does better with the player on the ice.