Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Oct 29, 2011·First Niagara Center, Buffalo

Florida Panthers 3, Buffalo Sabres 2

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Florida Panthers win this game 73% of the time.

BUF winsFLA wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
FLA05113218336
BUF0816112226

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P2 6:48FLAMarcel GocAssists: Scottie Upshall, Tomas Kopecky · Backhand, 0.08 xG1–0
  2. P2 18:14BUFThomas VanekAssists: Luke Adam, Tyler Myers · Wrap-around, 0.03 xG1–1
  3. P3 12:53BUFJason PominvillePPAssists: Brad Boyes, Christian Ehrhoff · Slap, 0.08 xG1–2
  4. P3 16:02FLATomas FleischmannAssists: Tomas Kopecky, Jason Garrison · Backhand, 0.06 xG2–2
  5. P3 18:17FLAJason GarrisonPPGWGAssists: Brian Campbell, Tomas Kopecky · Slap, 0.05 xG3–2
Penalties (12)
  1. P1 10:57BUFTyler Myers: Holding2 min
  2. P1 13:05FLAJack Skille: Too many men on the ice2 min
  3. P1 15:24FLAMarco Sturm: Tripping2 min
  4. P1 19:28BUFJordan Leopold: Holding2 min
  5. P2 7:07BUFDrew Stafford: High sticking2 min
  6. P2 15:28FLAJack Skille: Too many men on the ice2 min
  7. P3 11:43FLAShawn Matthias: Hooking2 min · PPG
  8. P3 13:15FLAMarco Sturm: Boarding5 min
  9. P3 13:15FLAMarco Sturm: Game misconduct10 min
  10. P3 13:15BUFDrew Stafford: Roughing2 min
  11. P3 14:41BUFNathan Gerbe: Tripping2 min
  12. P3 14:41BUFNathan Gerbe: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

FLA00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0BUF
45% to win55% to win
← FLA attackBUF attack →
  1. P1 20:00Goc won the faceoff against Gaustad
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

FLABUF
36Shots on goal26
2.6Expected goals1.3
55Shot attempts46
26Faceoffs won31
6Power plays4
23Penalty minutes12
14Hits20
8Blocked shots7
6Giveaways6
6Takeaways3

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Florida Panthers

Forward lines

  1. bestWeiss – Fleischmann – Versteeg10:01

    xG 0.46–0.12 (80%)attempts 14–4goals 0–0

  2. Sturm – Santorelli – Skille7:38

    xG 0.24–0.20 (55%)attempts 6–7goals 0–0

  3. Kopecky – Goc – Upshall7:47

    xG 0.16–0.19 (46%)attempts 5–10goals 1–0

  4. Bradley – Kennedy – Matthias7:35

    xG 0.13–0.27 (32%)attempts 5–9goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestCampbell – Garrison13:47

    xG 0.68–0.08 (90%)attempts 16–5goals 0–0

  2. Jovanovski – Gudbranson7:09

    xG 0.18–0.22 (45%)attempts 5–10goals 0–0

  3. Weaver – Kulikov12:38

    xG 0.24–0.39 (38%)attempts 11–15goals 0–0

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. bestRoy – Ellis – Stafford2:35

    xG 0.26–0.00 (100%)attempts 8–0goals 0–0

  2. Roy – Stafford – Gerbe3:05

    xG 0.17–0.02 (91%)attempts 8–1goals 0–0

  3. Gaustad – Kaleta – Gerbe8:13

    xG 0.13–0.12 (53%)attempts 5–4goals 0–0

  4. Roy – Stafford – Leino5:08

    xG 0.10–0.12 (45%)attempts 5–6goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestEhrhoff – Sekera12:09

    xG 0.43–0.28 (61%)attempts 16–11goals 0–1

  2. Regehr – Myers10:51

    xG 0.12–0.31 (28%)attempts 6–11goals 0–0

  3. Leopold – Gragnani10:33

    xG 0.15–0.37 (29%)attempts 7–10goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

BUF 1.3 xGFLA 2.6 xG
00.511.522.5P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

BUFFLA

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

BUF's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line BUF is favoured, below it FLA. Dots are goals.

Excitement 82/100 · #186 of 1230 this seasonSwing 2.21 · 5 goals in reachComeback index 9% (winner's lowest chance)
FLA 100%5050%50BUF 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +48 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Florida Panthers win this game 73% of the time.

BUF winsFLA wins

Simulated goal difference (BUF − FLA), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).