Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Oct 18, 2016·Scotiabank Saddledome, Calgary

Buffalo Sabres 3, Calgary Flames 4 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Calgary Flames win this game 68% of the time.

CGY winsBUF wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
BUF16141902321
CGY115082615434

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 7:25BUFZemgus GirgensonsAssists: Tyler Ennis · Wrist, 0.18 xG1–0
  2. P1 16:12CGYMichael FrolikAssists: Mikael Backlund, Brett Kulak · Wrist, 0.38 xG1–1
  3. P2 11:41BUFRyan O'ReillyPPAssists: Rasmus Ristolainen, Kyle Okposo · Slap, 0.20 xG2–1
  4. P3 1:10CGYMicheal FerlandUnassisted · Backhand, 0.11 xG2–2
  5. P3 3:49BUFMarcus FolignoAssists: Brian Gionta, Johan Larsson · Wrist, 0.06 xG3–2
  6. P3 4:52CGYMatthew TkachukAssists: Matt Stajan, Mark Giordano · Wrist, 0.05 xG3–3
  7. OT 2:26CGYSean MonahanGWGAssists: Johnny Gaudreau, Mark Giordano · Wrist, 0.19 xG3–4
Penalties (13)
  1. P1 3:12BUFJosh Gorges: Interference2 min
  2. P1 18:33BUFJake McCabe: Holding2 min
  3. P2 4:24BUFJosh Gorges: Interference2 min
  4. P2 4:24BUFMarcus Foligno: High sticking2 min
  5. P2 5:27CGYMark Giordano: High sticking2 min
  6. P2 10:44CGYMatt Stajan: Interference2 min · PPG
  7. P2 12:02CGYSam Bennett: Hooking2 min
  8. P3 9:24BUFNicolas Deslauriers: Roughing2 min
  9. P3 9:24BUFNicolas Deslauriers: Roughing2 min
  10. P3 9:24CGYMatthew Tkachuk: Roughing2 min
  11. P3 10:09CGYMark Giordano: Hooking2 min
  12. P3 10:14CGYSam Bennett: High sticking2 min
  13. P3 13:05BUFJohan Larsson: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

BUF00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CGY
44% to win56% to win
← BUF attackCGY attack →
  1. P1 20:00Bennett won the faceoff against Larsson
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

BUFCGY
21Shots on goal34
2.6Expected goals3.7
39Shot attempts61
36Faceoffs won30
5Power plays6
14Penalty minutes12
10Hits16
12Blocked shots10
8Giveaways20
6Takeaways11

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. bestEnnis – Girgensons – Baptiste4:30

    xG 0.19–0.11 (64%)attempts 2–2goals 1–0

  2. Gionta – Foligno – Larsson8:55

    xG 0.22–0.25 (47%)attempts 5–10goals 1–1

  3. Moulson – Grant – Deslauriers4:18

    xG 0.01–0.05 (14%)attempts 2–3goals 0–0

  4. Moulson – Girgensons – Baptiste2:16

    xG 0.00–0.06 (0%)attempts 1–2goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestKulikov – Ristolainen2:38

    xG 0.14–0.07 (67%)attempts 3–5goals 0–0

  2. Franson – Kulikov12:32

    xG 0.45–0.44 (51%)attempts 9–7goals 2–0

  3. Gorges – Ristolainen10:06

    xG 0.07–0.56 (11%)attempts 2–12goals 0–2

Calgary Flames

Forward lines

  1. bestFrolik – Backlund – Bouma8:34

    xG 0.97–0.20 (83%)attempts 7–8goals 1–0

  2. Stajan – Chiasson – Ferland5:40

    xG 0.60–0.15 (80%)attempts 10–1goals 0–0

  3. Brouwer – Ferland – Bennett2:17

    xG 0.11–0.17 (39%)attempts 2–2goals 1–1

  4. Versteeg – Gaudreau – Monahan5:59

    xG 0.07–0.14 (33%)attempts 6–3goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestEngelland – Kulak13:19

    xG 1.48–0.11 (93%)attempts 19–9goals 2–1

  2. Giordano – Brodie14:31

    xG 0.38–0.36 (51%)attempts 14–12goals 0–0

  3. Jokipakka – Hamilton11:26

    xG 0.15–0.61 (19%)attempts 6–5goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CGY 3.7 xGBUF 2.6 xG
01234P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CGYBUF

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CGY's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CGY is favoured, below it BUF. Dots are goals.

Excitement 91/100 · #94 of 1230 this seasonSwing 2.51 · 7 goals in reachComeback index 27% (winner's lowest chance)
BUF 100%5050%50CGY 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +26 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Calgary Flames win this game 68% of the time.

CGY winsBUF wins

Simulated goal difference (CGY − BUF), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).