Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Oct 20, 2022·Scotiabank Saddledome, Calgary

Buffalo Sabres 6, Calgary Flames 3

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Buffalo Sabres win this game 71% of the time.

CGY winsBUF wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
BUF31211426632
CGY116110117343

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 4:21CGYAndrew MangiapaneAssists: Nazem Kadri, Dillon Dube · Wrist, 0.11 xG0–1
  2. P1 6:34BUFDylan CozensAssists: Jacob Bryson, Vinnie Hinostroza · Poke, 0.27 xG1–1
  3. P1 10:49BUFRasmus DahlinAssists: JJ Peterka, Vinnie Hinostroza · Wrist, 0.08 xG2–1
  4. P1 13:10BUFCasey MittelstadtSHAssists: Vinnie Hinostroza, Owen Power · Backhand, 0.18 xG3–1
  5. P2 0:46BUFAlex TuchGWGAssists: Owen Power, Jacob Bryson · Snap, 0.07 xG4–1
  6. P2 19:57CGYTrevor LewisAssists: Jonathan Huberdeau, Michael Stone · Wrist, 0.17 xG4–2
  7. P3 1:09CGYNikita ZadorovAssists: Rasmus Andersson, Tyler Toffoli · Wrist, 0.03 xG4–3
  8. P3 5:41BUFAlex TuchPPAssists: Tage Thompson, Casey Mittelstadt · Wrist, 0.15 xG5–3
  9. P3 18:35BUFAlex TuchENAssists: Rasmus Asplund, Rasmus Dahlin · Wrist, 0.59 xG6–3
Penalties (6)
  1. P1 8:20CGYBrett Ritchie: Too many men on the ice2 min
  2. P1 11:37BUFAlex Tuch: Tripping2 min
  3. P2 5:01CGYChris Tanev: Hooking2 min
  4. P2 9:51CGYNikita Zadorov: Boarding2 min
  5. P3 4:54CGYNikita Zadorov: Tripping2 min · PPG
  6. P3 15:44CGYRasmus Andersson: Interference2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

BUF00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CGY
49% to win51% to win
← BUF attackCGY attack →
  1. P1 20:00Backlund won the faceoff against Thompson
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

BUFCGY
32Shots on goal43
4.4Expected goals3.0
65Shot attempts65
32Faceoffs won25
5Power plays1
2Penalty minutes10
11Hits29
12Blocked shots12
6Giveaways4
8Takeaways6

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. bestHinostroza – Cozens – Peterka8:21

    xG 0.76–0.35 (69%)attempts 10–9goals 1–2

  2. Olofsson – Asplund – Mittelstadt8:33

    xG 0.53–0.32 (63%)attempts 12–9goals 0–0

  3. Okposo – Girgensons – Krebs9:21

    xG 0.29–0.42 (41%)attempts 8–10goals 0–0

  4. Skinner – Tuch – Thompson10:37

    xG 0.42–1.06 (29%)attempts 8–18goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestSamuelsson – Dahlin11:31

    xG 0.72–0.38 (66%)attempts 12–13goals 1–0

  2. Bryson – Dahlin3:49

    xG 0.51–0.17 (75%)attempts 8–3goals 0–1

  3. Samuelsson – Power2:45

    xG 0.32–0.00 (100%)attempts 6–0goals 1–0

Calgary Flames

Forward lines

  1. bestBacklund – Toffoli – Huberdeau2:47

    xG 0.49–0.00 (100%)attempts 6–0goals 1–0

  2. Lewis – Backlund – Coleman6:33

    xG 0.50–0.05 (92%)attempts 11–4goals 0–0

  3. Kadri – Mangiapane – Dube5:27

    xG 0.54–0.33 (62%)attempts 10–5goals 1–0

  4. Kadri – Coleman – Mangiapane3:45

    xG 0.23–0.07 (78%)attempts 10–1goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestStone – Weegar2:56

    xG 0.39–0.00 (100%)attempts 7–1goals 1–0

  2. Stone – Zadorov2:33

    xG 0.26–0.00 (100%)attempts 6–0goals 0–0

  3. Stone – Mackey7:46

    xG 0.44–0.35 (56%)attempts 12–7goals 1–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CGY 3.0 xGBUF 4.4 xG
012345P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CGYBUF

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CGY's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CGY is favoured, below it BUF. Dots are goals.

Excitement 82/100 · #295 of 1312 this seasonSwing 1.49 · 9 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 30% (winner's lowest chance)
BUF 100%5050%50CGY 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +18 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Buffalo Sabres win this game 71% of the time.

CGY winsBUF wins

Simulated goal difference (CGY − BUF), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).